Digital interventions to support morality: A scoping review.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL British Journal of Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1111/bjep.12706
Chiara Scuotto, Stefano Triberti, Maria Luisa Iavarone, Pierpaolo Limone
{"title":"Digital interventions to support morality: A scoping review.","authors":"Chiara Scuotto, Stefano Triberti, Maria Luisa Iavarone, Pierpaolo Limone","doi":"10.1111/bjep.12706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Morality and moral reasoning develop over the course of life, but such development may encounter obstacles. Psycho-educational interventions could be designed to improve moral reasoning and attitude towards prosociality. In the last decades, many interventions employed digital technologies ranging from multicomponent online platforms to serious games and virtual reality, making use of interactivity and immersive properties that could make moral stimuli more engaging.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed at reviewing the literature on digital interventions to support morality and moral reasoning, carried out with subjects of all age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Two electronic databases were searched with a systematic approach, and retrieved publications were scanned by authors against inclusion criteria. Twenty-three articles were reviewed. In general, the literature describes encouraging results of digital interventions to support morality. Moreover, a huge variety of morality conceptualizations emerged across various contexts (e.g., professional, school and sports) as well as various outcome measurements (e.g., change in attitudes and change in behaviour).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effectiveness of digital interventions may relate to immersive and interactive simulations in particular, in that they allow participants not only to learn about moral rules and principles but also to actively exercise their own morality to make decisions. Future research may build on the present scoping review to analyse specific types of interventions' effectiveness with a meta-analytical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":51367,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12706","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Morality and moral reasoning develop over the course of life, but such development may encounter obstacles. Psycho-educational interventions could be designed to improve moral reasoning and attitude towards prosociality. In the last decades, many interventions employed digital technologies ranging from multicomponent online platforms to serious games and virtual reality, making use of interactivity and immersive properties that could make moral stimuli more engaging.

Aims: This study aimed at reviewing the literature on digital interventions to support morality and moral reasoning, carried out with subjects of all age groups.

Methods and results: Two electronic databases were searched with a systematic approach, and retrieved publications were scanned by authors against inclusion criteria. Twenty-three articles were reviewed. In general, the literature describes encouraging results of digital interventions to support morality. Moreover, a huge variety of morality conceptualizations emerged across various contexts (e.g., professional, school and sports) as well as various outcome measurements (e.g., change in attitudes and change in behaviour).

Conclusions: Effectiveness of digital interventions may relate to immersive and interactive simulations in particular, in that they allow participants not only to learn about moral rules and principles but also to actively exercise their own morality to make decisions. Future research may build on the present scoping review to analyse specific types of interventions' effectiveness with a meta-analytical approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持道德的数字化干预措施:范围审查。
背景:道德和道德推理在人的一生中会不断发展,但这种发展可能会遇到障碍。可以设计心理教育干预措施来提高道德推理能力和亲社会态度。在过去的几十年里,许多干预措施都采用了数字技术,从多组件在线平台到严肃游戏和虚拟现实,利用互动性和身临其境的特性,使道德刺激更加吸引人:采用系统方法检索了两个电子数据库,作者根据纳入标准对检索到的出版物进行了扫描。共审查了 23 篇文章。总体而言,文献介绍了支持道德的数字干预措施所取得的令人鼓舞的成果。此外,在不同的环境(如职业、学校和体育)以及不同的结果测量(如态度和行为的改变)中,出现了大量不同的道德概念:结论:数字干预的有效性可能与身临其境的交互式模拟特别相关,因为它们不仅能让参与者学习道德规则和原则,还能让他们积极运用自己的道德观做出决定。未来的研究可以在本范围审查的基础上,采用元分析方法分析特定类型干预措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Educational Psychology publishes original psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels including: - cognition - learning - motivation - literacy - numeracy and language - behaviour - social-emotional development - developmental difficulties linked to educational psychology or the psychology of education
期刊最新文献
The effects of special educational needs and socioeconomic status on teachers' and parents' judgements of pupils' cognitive abilities. Feeling better now? Being defended diminishes daily mood problems and self-blame in victims of bullying. Learning from errors and failure in educational contexts: New insights and future directions for research and practice. A machine-learning model of academic resilience in the times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence drawn from 79 countries/economies in the PISA 2022 mathematics study. Attitudes towards statistics and statistical performance: A mediation model of statistics anxiety and academic procrastination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1