Is it possible to objectively determine morning stiffness in rheumatoid arthritis?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-01-04 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.5606/tftrd.2024.12219
Gönen Mengi, Hüseyin Aydoğmuş, Özden Özyemişçi Taşkıran, Feride Göğüş, Mehmet Beyazova
{"title":"Is it possible to objectively determine morning stiffness in rheumatoid arthritis?","authors":"Gönen Mengi, Hüseyin Aydoğmuş, Özden Özyemişçi Taşkıran, Feride Göğüş, Mehmet Beyazova","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2024.12219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to objectively and quantitatively exhibit morning stiffness by using electrophysiological methods.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The prospective, controlled study was conducted with 52 participants between February 2013 and February 2014. Of the participants, 26 were recruited among RA patients (3 males, 23 females; mean age: 55.9±11.2 years; range, 24 to 74 years) followed at the rheumatology clinic, and 26 were healthy subjects (4 males, 22 females; mean age: 54.9±8.3 years; range, 41 to 70 years) for the control group. Duration and severity of morning stiffness were recorded for all participants. Activity of disease and functional status were evaluated by the Disease Activity Score 28 and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), respectively. Electrophysiological reaction times, severity of pain (Visual Analog Scale), HAQ, and grip strength were measured for each participant twice in 24 h in the morning (08:00-09:00 am) and afternoon (03:00-05:00 pm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the RA group, motor reaction and response times and severity of pain values were significantly lower in the afternoon compared to the morning (p=0.030, p=0.031, and p=0.002, respectively), and hand grip strengths were significantly higher in the afternoon (p=0.007). In the control group, no change was observed between morning and afternoon measurements in the strength and reaction time variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our hypothesis that stiffness would slow down the movements in the morning in RA was supported by the prolonged motor and response times in the morning compared to the afternoon. However, in the control group (no morning stiffness), there was no difference in reaction time variables between the morning and afternoon, objectively demonstrating the concept of morning stiffness in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"70 2","pages":"180-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11209333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.12219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to objectively and quantitatively exhibit morning stiffness by using electrophysiological methods.

Patients and methods: The prospective, controlled study was conducted with 52 participants between February 2013 and February 2014. Of the participants, 26 were recruited among RA patients (3 males, 23 females; mean age: 55.9±11.2 years; range, 24 to 74 years) followed at the rheumatology clinic, and 26 were healthy subjects (4 males, 22 females; mean age: 54.9±8.3 years; range, 41 to 70 years) for the control group. Duration and severity of morning stiffness were recorded for all participants. Activity of disease and functional status were evaluated by the Disease Activity Score 28 and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), respectively. Electrophysiological reaction times, severity of pain (Visual Analog Scale), HAQ, and grip strength were measured for each participant twice in 24 h in the morning (08:00-09:00 am) and afternoon (03:00-05:00 pm).

Results: In the RA group, motor reaction and response times and severity of pain values were significantly lower in the afternoon compared to the morning (p=0.030, p=0.031, and p=0.002, respectively), and hand grip strengths were significantly higher in the afternoon (p=0.007). In the control group, no change was observed between morning and afternoon measurements in the strength and reaction time variables.

Conclusion: Our hypothesis that stiffness would slow down the movements in the morning in RA was supported by the prolonged motor and response times in the morning compared to the afternoon. However, in the control group (no morning stiffness), there was no difference in reaction time variables between the morning and afternoon, objectively demonstrating the concept of morning stiffness in this study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
能否客观地判断类风湿性关节炎的晨僵现象?
研究目的本研究旨在通过电生理学方法客观、定量地展示晨僵:这项前瞻性对照研究在 2013 年 2 月至 2014 年 2 月期间进行,共有 52 名参与者。其中,26 名参与者是在风湿病诊所接受随访的 RA 患者(3 名男性,23 名女性;平均年龄:55.9±11.2 岁;年龄范围:24 至 74 岁),26 名参与者是对照组的健康受试者(4 名男性,22 名女性;平均年龄:54.9±8.3 岁;年龄范围:41 至 70 岁)。所有参与者的晨僵持续时间和严重程度均有记录。疾病活动度和功能状态分别通过疾病活动度评分 28 和健康评估问卷(HAQ)进行评估。在 24 小时内,分别在上午(08:00-09:00)和下午(03:00-05:00)两次测量每位参与者的电生理反应时间、疼痛严重程度(视觉模拟量表)、HAQ 和握力:在 RA 组中,下午的运动反应和响应时间以及疼痛严重程度值与上午相比显著降低(分别为 p=0.030、p=0.031 和 p=0.002),而下午的手握力显著提高(p=0.007)。在对照组中,上午和下午测量的力量和反应时间变量没有变化:结论:与下午相比,上午的运动和反应时间延长,这证明了我们的假设,即僵硬会减慢 RA 患者上午的运动速度。然而,在对照组(无晨僵)中,上午和下午的反应时间变量没有差异,客观地证明了本研究中晨僵的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).
期刊最新文献
Robot-assisted gait training in stroke. Short-term effectiveness of epidermis dermis fascia kinesiotaping technique in myofascial pain syndrome on upper trapezius: A multi-center, double-blind, randomized clinical study. Comparison of the effect of separate and simultaneous application of Tecar therapy and low-level laser therapy on the neurological symptoms of type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy of lower limbs. Effect of low-frequency repetitive magnetic transcranial stimulation in hemichorea-hemiballismus with ipsilateral basal ganglia hemorrhage: A case report. Effectiveness of static, dynamic and combined dry needling techniques in the management of myofascial pain syndrome: A three-group study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1