Which aerobic exercise is more effective in Parkinson's patients? Cycle ergometer versus body weight-supported treadmill.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-05-17 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.5606/tftrd.2024.11991
Merve Yalçın Tavşan, Gökay Taylan, Maryam Zare, Hande Özdemir, Filiz Tuna, Necdet Süt, Sibel Güler, Muhammet Gürdoğan, Derya Demirbağ Kabayel
{"title":"Which aerobic exercise is more effective in Parkinson's patients? Cycle ergometer versus body weight-supported treadmill.","authors":"Merve Yalçın Tavşan, Gökay Taylan, Maryam Zare, Hande Özdemir, Filiz Tuna, Necdet Süt, Sibel Güler, Muhammet Gürdoğan, Derya Demirbağ Kabayel","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2024.11991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the effects of aerobic exercise applied with bodyweight-supported treadmill (BWSTT) or cycle ergometer (CE) in Parkinson's patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In the prospective single-blind study, 38 Parkinson's patients with Hoehn-Yahr Stage 1-3 were randomized into the CE and BWSTT groups between May 2019 and March 2020. Evaluations before and after six weeks of treatment included a six-min walking test with a software device as the primary outcome and functional balance tests (Tinetti balance and gait test, one-leg stance balance test) as secondary outcomes. Both groups received 40 min of aerobic exercise three days per week with conventional rehabilitation and various methods. CE and BWSTT groups were created. The aerobic exercise program was designed based on treatment recommendations for Parkinson's patients of the American College of Sports Medicine (CE test, with the Karvonen formula, 40-60% reserve). Posttreatment and pretreatment evaluations were compared within and between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The six-week aerobic exercise program was completed by 16 participants (9 males, 7 females; mean age: 65.9±8.1; range, 47 to 78 years) in the CE group and 15 participants (9 males, 6 females; mean age: 62.5±7.5; range, 49 to 79 years) in the BWSTT group. The demographic characteristics of the patients were similar. Primary and secondary outcomes were significantly different after treatment than before treatment in both groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed that both methods are effective and not superior to each other. Aerobic exercise programs led by experienced clinicians can benefit patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11209324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.11991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the effects of aerobic exercise applied with bodyweight-supported treadmill (BWSTT) or cycle ergometer (CE) in Parkinson's patients.

Patients and methods: In the prospective single-blind study, 38 Parkinson's patients with Hoehn-Yahr Stage 1-3 were randomized into the CE and BWSTT groups between May 2019 and March 2020. Evaluations before and after six weeks of treatment included a six-min walking test with a software device as the primary outcome and functional balance tests (Tinetti balance and gait test, one-leg stance balance test) as secondary outcomes. Both groups received 40 min of aerobic exercise three days per week with conventional rehabilitation and various methods. CE and BWSTT groups were created. The aerobic exercise program was designed based on treatment recommendations for Parkinson's patients of the American College of Sports Medicine (CE test, with the Karvonen formula, 40-60% reserve). Posttreatment and pretreatment evaluations were compared within and between groups.

Results: The six-week aerobic exercise program was completed by 16 participants (9 males, 7 females; mean age: 65.9±8.1; range, 47 to 78 years) in the CE group and 15 participants (9 males, 6 females; mean age: 62.5±7.5; range, 49 to 79 years) in the BWSTT group. The demographic characteristics of the patients were similar. Primary and secondary outcomes were significantly different after treatment than before treatment in both groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in outcomes.

Conclusion: The results showed that both methods are effective and not superior to each other. Aerobic exercise programs led by experienced clinicians can benefit patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪种有氧运动对帕金森病患者更有效?自行车测力计与体重支撑跑步机。
研究目的研究旨在评估帕金森病患者使用体重支撑跑步机(BWSTT)或自行车测力计(CE)进行有氧运动的效果:在这项前瞻性单盲研究中,38名Hoehn-Yahr 1-3期帕金森患者在2019年5月至2020年3月期间被随机分为CE组和BWSTT组。治疗前后六周的评估包括作为主要结果的软件设备六分钟步行测试和作为次要结果的功能平衡测试(Tinetti 平衡和步态测试、单腿站立平衡测试)。两组患者均接受每周三天、每次 40 分钟的有氧运动,并采用传统康复训练和各种方法。分为 CE 组和 BWSTT 组。有氧运动项目是根据美国运动医学学会对帕金森病人的治疗建议设计的(CE 测试,采用卡沃宁公式,40-60% 储备)。在组内和组间比较了治疗后和治疗前的评估结果:CE组和BWSTT组分别有16人(9男7女;平均年龄:65.9±8.1;年龄范围:47至78岁)和15人(9男6女;平均年龄:62.5±7.5;年龄范围:49至79岁)完成了为期六周的有氧运动计划。患者的人口统计学特征相似。两组患者治疗后的主要和次要结果与治疗前相比均有显著差异。两组间的结果无明显差异:结果表明,两种方法都有效,但并无优劣之分。由经验丰富的临床医生领导的有氧运动计划可使患者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive analysis of publication of physical medicine and rehabilitation theses in Türkiye between years 2010 and 2020: Academic productivity and related factors. Effect of platelet-rich plasma injections versus placebo on pain and quality of life in patients with hip osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Local ozone injection compared to local glucocorticoid injection in carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Which aerobic exercise is more effective in Parkinson's patients? Cycle ergometer versus body weight-supported treadmill. Adherence to complete decongestive therapy in patients with postmastectomy lymphedema and related factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1