Olufemi Erinoso , Olatokunbo Osibogun , Wei Li , Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan
{"title":"Longitudinal examination of ENDS characteristics, flavors, and nicotine content for cigarette cessation: Findings from PATH waves 5–6","authors":"Olufemi Erinoso , Olatokunbo Osibogun , Wei Li , Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A subpopulation of adults who smoke cigarettes use electronic nicotine device systems (ENDS) for cigarette cessation. This study examined the relationship between ENDS flavors, device types, and nicotine concentration with past month cigarette abstinence among adults using ENDS for cigarette cessation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study (waves 5 and 6) to identify adults who self-reported using ENDS to quit cigarettes at baseline (wave 5) and investigated their cigarette abstinence at follow-up (wave 6) [n = 1252]. Measures assessed include ENDS features (flavors, device types, nicotine concentration) at baseline and past-month abstinence from cigarette smoking at follow-up. Weighted descriptive analysis was used, and multivariable logistic regression models examined ENDS features associated with past-month cigarette abstinence, adjusting for demographic factors and tobacco dependence at baseline.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most participants used disposable devices (37.2 %; 95 % CI:33.2–41.5), followed by refillable tanks (30.2 %; 95 % CI:26.2–34.5). Additionally, fruit (41.3 %; 95 % CI:37.3–45.5), followed by menthol (19.1 %; 95 % CI:16.2–22.4), and tobacco (18.5 %; 95 % CI:15.5–22.1) were the most common flavors. The most common nicotine concentration used was 1–6 mg/ml (38.8 %; 95 % CI:34.6–43.2). Furthermore, in the adjusted model, daily ENDS users at baseline had 86 % (95 % CI:1.08–3.18) higher odds of past month cigarette abstinence at follow-up, than individuals who indicated ‘not at all’ to the current use of ENDS at baseline. There were no significant differences by preferred flavors, device type and nicotine concentrations (p-values > 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Daily ENDS users had higher odds of quitting cigarettes compared to those who stopped using ENDS. However, the type of device, flavoring, and nicotine concentration used by ENDS users were not associated with past-month cigarette abstinence at follow-up two years later.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324001461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
A subpopulation of adults who smoke cigarettes use electronic nicotine device systems (ENDS) for cigarette cessation. This study examined the relationship between ENDS flavors, device types, and nicotine concentration with past month cigarette abstinence among adults using ENDS for cigarette cessation.
Methods
We used the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study (waves 5 and 6) to identify adults who self-reported using ENDS to quit cigarettes at baseline (wave 5) and investigated their cigarette abstinence at follow-up (wave 6) [n = 1252]. Measures assessed include ENDS features (flavors, device types, nicotine concentration) at baseline and past-month abstinence from cigarette smoking at follow-up. Weighted descriptive analysis was used, and multivariable logistic regression models examined ENDS features associated with past-month cigarette abstinence, adjusting for demographic factors and tobacco dependence at baseline.
Results
Most participants used disposable devices (37.2 %; 95 % CI:33.2–41.5), followed by refillable tanks (30.2 %; 95 % CI:26.2–34.5). Additionally, fruit (41.3 %; 95 % CI:37.3–45.5), followed by menthol (19.1 %; 95 % CI:16.2–22.4), and tobacco (18.5 %; 95 % CI:15.5–22.1) were the most common flavors. The most common nicotine concentration used was 1–6 mg/ml (38.8 %; 95 % CI:34.6–43.2). Furthermore, in the adjusted model, daily ENDS users at baseline had 86 % (95 % CI:1.08–3.18) higher odds of past month cigarette abstinence at follow-up, than individuals who indicated ‘not at all’ to the current use of ENDS at baseline. There were no significant differences by preferred flavors, device type and nicotine concentrations (p-values > 0.05).
Conclusions
Daily ENDS users had higher odds of quitting cigarettes compared to those who stopped using ENDS. However, the type of device, flavoring, and nicotine concentration used by ENDS users were not associated with past-month cigarette abstinence at follow-up two years later.
期刊介绍:
Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.
Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.