Exploring the evolutionary trajectory and functional landscape of cannabinoid receptors: A comprehensive bioinformatic analysis

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY Computational Biology and Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108138
Marushka Soobben, Yasien Sayed, Ikechukwu Achilonu
{"title":"Exploring the evolutionary trajectory and functional landscape of cannabinoid receptors: A comprehensive bioinformatic analysis","authors":"Marushka Soobben,&nbsp;Yasien Sayed,&nbsp;Ikechukwu Achilonu","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The bioinformatic analysis of cannabinoid receptors (CBRs) CB<sub>1</sub> and CB<sub>2</sub> reveals a detailed picture of their structure, evolution, and physiological significance within the endocannabinoid system (ECS). The study highlights the evolutionary conservation of these receptors evidenced by sequence alignments across diverse species including humans, amphibians, and fish. Both CBRs share a structural hallmark of seven transmembrane (TM) helices, characteristic of class A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are critical for their signalling functions. The study reports a similarity of 44.58 % between both CBR sequences, which suggests that while their evolutionary paths and physiological roles may differ, there is considerable conservation in their structures. Pathway databases like KEGG, Reactome, and WikiPathways were employed to determine the involvement of the receptors in various signalling pathways. The pathway analyses integrated within this study offer a detailed view of the CBRs interactions within a complex network of cannabinoid-related signalling pathways. High-resolution crystal structures (PDB ID: 5U09 for CB<sub>1</sub> and 5ZTY for CB<sub>2</sub>) provided accurate structural information, showing the binding pocket volume and surface area of the receptors, essential for ligand interaction. The comparison between these receptors' natural sequences and their engineered pseudo-CBRs (p-CBRs) showed a high degree of sequence identity, confirming the validity of using p-CBRs in receptor-ligand interaction studies. This comprehensive analysis enhances the understanding of the structural and functional dynamics of cannabinoid receptors, highlighting their physiological roles and their potential as therapeutic targets within the ECS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10616,"journal":{"name":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476927124001269/pdfft?md5=ff8efed5599d827924f950f3802fd593&pid=1-s2.0-S1476927124001269-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476927124001269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The bioinformatic analysis of cannabinoid receptors (CBRs) CB1 and CB2 reveals a detailed picture of their structure, evolution, and physiological significance within the endocannabinoid system (ECS). The study highlights the evolutionary conservation of these receptors evidenced by sequence alignments across diverse species including humans, amphibians, and fish. Both CBRs share a structural hallmark of seven transmembrane (TM) helices, characteristic of class A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are critical for their signalling functions. The study reports a similarity of 44.58 % between both CBR sequences, which suggests that while their evolutionary paths and physiological roles may differ, there is considerable conservation in their structures. Pathway databases like KEGG, Reactome, and WikiPathways were employed to determine the involvement of the receptors in various signalling pathways. The pathway analyses integrated within this study offer a detailed view of the CBRs interactions within a complex network of cannabinoid-related signalling pathways. High-resolution crystal structures (PDB ID: 5U09 for CB1 and 5ZTY for CB2) provided accurate structural information, showing the binding pocket volume and surface area of the receptors, essential for ligand interaction. The comparison between these receptors' natural sequences and their engineered pseudo-CBRs (p-CBRs) showed a high degree of sequence identity, confirming the validity of using p-CBRs in receptor-ligand interaction studies. This comprehensive analysis enhances the understanding of the structural and functional dynamics of cannabinoid receptors, highlighting their physiological roles and their potential as therapeutic targets within the ECS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索大麻素受体的进化轨迹和功能格局:全面的生物信息学分析。
对大麻素受体(CBRs)CB1 和 CB2 的生物信息学分析详细揭示了它们在内源性大麻素系统(ECS)中的结构、进化和生理意义。该研究强调了这些受体的进化保护,包括人类、两栖动物和鱼类等不同物种的序列比对证明了这一点。这两种 CBR 都具有 A 类 G 蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)所特有的七个跨膜(TM)螺旋的结构特征,这对它们的信号功能至关重要。研究报告显示,这两种 CBR 序列的相似度为 44.58%,这表明虽然它们的进化路径和生理作用可能不同,但它们的结构有相当大的一致性。研究人员利用 KEGG、Reactome 和 WikiPathways 等通路数据库来确定受体参与各种信号通路的情况。本研究整合的通路分析提供了大麻素相关信号通路复杂网络中 CBRs 相互作用的详细视图。高分辨率晶体结构(CB1 的 PDB ID:5U09 和 CB2 的 PDB ID:5ZTY)提供了准确的结构信息,显示了配体相互作用所必需的受体结合袋体积和表面积。这些受体的天然序列与其工程化的假CBRs(p-CBRs)之间的比较显示了高度的序列同一性,证实了在受体与配体相互作用研究中使用p-CBRs的有效性。这项全面的分析加深了人们对大麻素受体结构和功能动态的了解,突出了它们的生理作用以及作为 ECS 治疗靶点的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computational Biology and Chemistry
Computational Biology and Chemistry 生物-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
142
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Computational Biology and Chemistry publishes original research papers and review articles in all areas of computational life sciences. High quality research contributions with a major computational component in the areas of nucleic acid and protein sequence research, molecular evolution, molecular genetics (functional genomics and proteomics), theory and practice of either biology-specific or chemical-biology-specific modeling, and structural biology of nucleic acids and proteins are particularly welcome. Exceptionally high quality research work in bioinformatics, systems biology, ecology, computational pharmacology, metabolism, biomedical engineering, epidemiology, and statistical genetics will also be considered. Given their inherent uncertainty, protein modeling and molecular docking studies should be thoroughly validated. In the absence of experimental results for validation, the use of molecular dynamics simulations along with detailed free energy calculations, for example, should be used as complementary techniques to support the major conclusions. Submissions of premature modeling exercises without additional biological insights will not be considered. Review articles will generally be commissioned by the editors and should not be submitted to the journal without explicit invitation. However prospective authors are welcome to send a brief (one to three pages) synopsis, which will be evaluated by the editors.
期刊最新文献
ILYCROsite: Identification of lysine crotonylation sites based on FCM-GRNN undersampling technique A comprehensive bioinformatic analysis of the role of TGF-β1-stimulated activating transcription factor 3 by non-coding RNAs during breast cancer progression Unveiling therapeutic biomarkers and druggable targets in ALS: An integrative microarray analysis, molecular docking, and structural dynamic studies Accurately identifying positive and negative regulation of apoptosis using fusion features and machine learning methods Molecular descriptors and in silico studies of 4-((5-(decylthio)-4-methyl-4n-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl)morpholine as a potential drug for the treatment of fungal pathologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1