Reduced contrast dose for CT head studies during COVID-19-related contrast shortage: Lesson from a crisis

Abstract

Objective

Intravenous contrast injection protocol for certain CT studies at our institution was revised in June 2022 in response to the global shortage of iohexol. This included CT head studies performed for neuro-navigation (contrast dose from 90 mL to 70 mL). The quality of these studies was assessed.

Methods

Consecutive CT scans before (n = 32) and after (n = 32) contrast dose reduction were reviewed. Demographic data was obtained from the chart. Subjective observations made by two radiologists in consensus included overall study quality (Likert scale of 1 to 5) and lesion location, margins and internal characteristics that were compared with MRI findings (reference standard) using Fisher's exact test. Superior sagittal sinus attenuation, used as an objective measurement of enhancement, and lesion size were compared using Student's t-test. The institutional database was searched for any study requiring repetition or deemed non-diagnostic.

Results/Discussion

The average age (61.1 ± 12.7 years and 61.6 ± 14.9 years) and body surface area (BSA) (1.9 ± 0.3 m² and 1.9 ± 0.02 m²) was not significantly different (p > 0.05) between groups. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in objective or subjective enhancement between the two groups. There was no significant difference between CT and MRI for lesion size, location, number, margins and internal enhancement characteristics in the two groups. No study required repetition or was reported as non-diagnostic. There was no adverse comment about study quality in operative notes.

Conclusion

Reduced contrast dose neuro-navigation CT head studies are not different in quality compared to the conventional studies.