Maximizing Insights from Longitudinal Epigenetic Age Data: Simulations, Applications, and Practical Guidance.

Anna Großbach, Matthew J Suderman, Anke Hüls, Alexandre A Lussier, Andrew D A C Smith, Esther Walton, Erin C Dunn, Andrew J Simpkin
{"title":"Maximizing Insights from Longitudinal Epigenetic Age Data: Simulations, Applications, and Practical Guidance.","authors":"Anna Großbach, Matthew J Suderman, Anke Hüls, Alexandre A Lussier, Andrew D A C Smith, Esther Walton, Erin C Dunn, Andrew J Simpkin","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4482915/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epigenetic Age (EA) is an age estimate, developed using DNA methylation (DNAm) states of selected CpG sites across the genome. Although EA and chronological age are highly correlated, EA may not increase uniformly with time. Departures, known as epigenetic age acceleration (EAA), are common and have been linked to various traits and future disease risk. Limited by available data, most studies investigating these relationships have been cross-sectional - using a single EA measurement. However, the recent growth in longitudinal DNAm studies has led to analyses of associations with EA over time. These studies differ in (i) their choice of model; (ii) the primary outcome (EA vs. EAA); and (iii) in their use of chronological age or age-independent time variables to account for the temporal dynamic. We evaluated the robustness of each approach using simulations and tested our results in two real-world examples, using biological sex and birthweight as predictors of longitudinal EA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our simulations showed most accurate effect sizes in a linear mixed model or generalized estimating equation, using chronological age as the time variable. The use of EA versus EAA as an outcome did not strongly impact estimates. Applying the optimal model in real-world data uncovered an accelerated EA rate in males and an advanced EA that decelerates over time in children with higher birthweight.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results can serve as a guide for forthcoming longitudinal EA studies, aiding in methodological decisions that may determine whether an association is accurately estimated, overestimated, or potentially overlooked.</p>","PeriodicalId":94282,"journal":{"name":"Research square","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11213208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4482915/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Epigenetic Age (EA) is an age estimate, developed using DNA methylation (DNAm) states of selected CpG sites across the genome. Although EA and chronological age are highly correlated, EA may not increase uniformly with time. Departures, known as epigenetic age acceleration (EAA), are common and have been linked to various traits and future disease risk. Limited by available data, most studies investigating these relationships have been cross-sectional - using a single EA measurement. However, the recent growth in longitudinal DNAm studies has led to analyses of associations with EA over time. These studies differ in (i) their choice of model; (ii) the primary outcome (EA vs. EAA); and (iii) in their use of chronological age or age-independent time variables to account for the temporal dynamic. We evaluated the robustness of each approach using simulations and tested our results in two real-world examples, using biological sex and birthweight as predictors of longitudinal EA.

Results: Our simulations showed most accurate effect sizes in a linear mixed model or generalized estimating equation, using chronological age as the time variable. The use of EA versus EAA as an outcome did not strongly impact estimates. Applying the optimal model in real-world data uncovered an accelerated EA rate in males and an advanced EA that decelerates over time in children with higher birthweight.

Conclusion: Our results can serve as a guide for forthcoming longitudinal EA studies, aiding in methodological decisions that may determine whether an association is accurately estimated, overestimated, or potentially overlooked.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从纵向表观遗传年龄数据中获得最大启示:模拟、应用和实践指导。
背景表观遗传年龄(Epigenetic Age,EA)是一种年龄估计方法,它是利用基因组中选定 CpG 位点的 DNA 甲基化(DNAm)状态得出的。虽然表观遗传年龄与实际年龄高度相关,但表观遗传年龄可能不会随时间均匀增长。被称为表观遗传年龄加速(EAA)的偏离现象很常见,并与各种特征和未来疾病风险有关。受可用数据的限制,大多数调查这些关系的研究都是横断面研究--使用单一的 EA 测量。然而,随着最近 DNAm 纵向研究的增加,对 EA 随时间变化的相关性进行了分析。这些研究在以下方面存在差异:(i) 模型选择;(ii) 主要结果(EA 与 EAA);(iii) 使用年代年龄或与年龄无关的时间变量来解释时间动态。我们通过模拟评估了每种方法的稳健性,并在两个真实世界的例子中测试了我们的结果,这两个例子使用生物学性别和出生体重作为纵向 EA 的预测因子。结果 我们的模拟结果表明,以年代年龄作为时间变量的线性混合模型或广义估计方程的效应大小最为准确。使用 EA 还是 EAA 作为结果对估计值影响不大。在真实世界数据中应用最佳模型发现,男性的 EA 速度加快,出生体重越大的儿童 EA 越高,速度越慢。结论 我们的研究结果可为即将开展的EA纵向研究提供指导,有助于在方法学上做出决定,从而确定某种关联是被准确估计、高估还是可能被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long non-coding RNA Malat1 fine-tunes bone homeostasis and repair by orchestrating cellular crosstalk and the β-catenin-OPG/Jagged1 pathway. Dietary lipid is largely deposited in skin and rapidly affects insulating properties. Novel Machine Learning of DNA Methylation Patterns to Diagnose Complex Disease: Identification of Cerebral Palsy with Concurrent Epilepsy. The context-dependent epigenetic and organogenesis programs determine 3D vs. 2D cellular fitness of MYC-driven murine liver cancer cells. GZMK+CD8+ T cells Target A Specific Acinar Cell Type in Sjögren's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1