Hassan Bagher-Ebadian, Stephen L Brown, Mohammad M Ghassemi, Prabhu C Acharya, Indrin J Chetty, Benjamin Movsas, James R Ewing, Kundan Thind
{"title":"Probabilistic Nested Model Selection in Pharmacokinetic Analysis of DCE-MRI Data in Animal Model of Cerebral Tumor.","authors":"Hassan Bagher-Ebadian, Stephen L Brown, Mohammad M Ghassemi, Prabhu C Acharya, Indrin J Chetty, Benjamin Movsas, James R Ewing, Kundan Thind","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4469232/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Best current practice in the analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI is to employ a voxel-by-voxel model selection from a hierarchy of nested models. This nested model selection (NMS) assumes that the observed time-trace of contrast-agent (CA) concentration within a voxel, corresponds to a singular physiologically nested model. However, admixtures of different models may exist within a voxel's CA time-trace. This study introduces an unsupervised feature engineering technique (Kohonen-Self-Organizing-Map (K-SOM)) to estimate the voxel-wise probability of each nested model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six immune-compromised-RNU rats were implanted with human U-251N cancer cells, and DCE-MRI data were acquired from all the rat brains. The time-trace of change in the longitudinalrelaxivity <math> <mfenced><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </math> for all animals' brain voxels was calculated. DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed using NMS to estimate three model regions: Model-1: normal vasculature without leakage, Model-2: tumor tissues with leakage without back-flux to the vasculature, Model-3: tumor vessels with leakage and back-flux. Approximately two hundred thirty thousand (229,314) normalized <math><mi>Δ</mi> <msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow> </msub> </math> profiles of animals' brain voxels along with their NMS results were used to build a K-SOM (topology-size: 8×8, with competitive-learning algorithm) and probability map of each model. <i>K</i>-fold nested-cross-validation (NCV, k=10) was used to evaluate the performance of the K-SOM probabilistic-NMS (PNMS) technique against the NMS technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The K-SOM PNMS's estimation for the leaky tumor regions were strongly similar (Dice-Similarity-Coefficient, DSC=0.774 [CI: 0.731-0.823], and 0.866 [CI: 0.828-0.912] for Models 2 and 3, respectively) to their respective NMS regions. The mean-percent-differences (MPDs, NCV, k=10) for the estimated permeability parameters by the two techniques were: -28%, +18%, and +24%, for <math> <msub><mrow><mi>v</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mtext>trans</mtext></mrow> </msup> </math> , and <math> <msub><mrow><mi>v</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>e</mi></mrow> </msub> </math> , respectively. The KSOM-PNMS technique produced microvasculature parameters and NMS regions less impacted by the arterial-input-function dispersion effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study introduces an unsupervised model-averaging technique (K-SOM) to estimate the contribution of different nested-models in PK analysis and provides a faster estimate of permeability parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":94282,"journal":{"name":"Research square","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11213218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4469232/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Best current practice in the analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI is to employ a voxel-by-voxel model selection from a hierarchy of nested models. This nested model selection (NMS) assumes that the observed time-trace of contrast-agent (CA) concentration within a voxel, corresponds to a singular physiologically nested model. However, admixtures of different models may exist within a voxel's CA time-trace. This study introduces an unsupervised feature engineering technique (Kohonen-Self-Organizing-Map (K-SOM)) to estimate the voxel-wise probability of each nested model.
Methods: Sixty-six immune-compromised-RNU rats were implanted with human U-251N cancer cells, and DCE-MRI data were acquired from all the rat brains. The time-trace of change in the longitudinalrelaxivity for all animals' brain voxels was calculated. DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed using NMS to estimate three model regions: Model-1: normal vasculature without leakage, Model-2: tumor tissues with leakage without back-flux to the vasculature, Model-3: tumor vessels with leakage and back-flux. Approximately two hundred thirty thousand (229,314) normalized profiles of animals' brain voxels along with their NMS results were used to build a K-SOM (topology-size: 8×8, with competitive-learning algorithm) and probability map of each model. K-fold nested-cross-validation (NCV, k=10) was used to evaluate the performance of the K-SOM probabilistic-NMS (PNMS) technique against the NMS technique.
Results: The K-SOM PNMS's estimation for the leaky tumor regions were strongly similar (Dice-Similarity-Coefficient, DSC=0.774 [CI: 0.731-0.823], and 0.866 [CI: 0.828-0.912] for Models 2 and 3, respectively) to their respective NMS regions. The mean-percent-differences (MPDs, NCV, k=10) for the estimated permeability parameters by the two techniques were: -28%, +18%, and +24%, for , and , respectively. The KSOM-PNMS technique produced microvasculature parameters and NMS regions less impacted by the arterial-input-function dispersion effect.
Conclusion: This study introduces an unsupervised model-averaging technique (K-SOM) to estimate the contribution of different nested-models in PK analysis and provides a faster estimate of permeability parameters.