L N Liu, Q Yang, L P Liu, H F Jiang, S X Zhang, C Gao, B Jin
{"title":"[Ultrasonic convex array probe applied to increase success rate of external cephalic version without anesthesia].","authors":"L N Liu, Q Yang, L P Liu, H F Jiang, S X Zhang, C Gao, B Jin","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20231226-00280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the feasibility of using ultrasonic convex array probe compressing abdominal wall to increase success rate of external cephalic version (ECV) without anesthesia in full-term and near-term pregnancy. <b>Methods:</b> Totally 190 singleton and non-cephalic presentation pregnant women in 36-39<sup>+4</sup> weeks of gestation performed ECV from April 2019 to August 2023 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were analyzed. According to whether use the ultrasound probe compressing fetal breech or not, the pregnant women were divided into two groups: 81 cases in the probe-compressing group (including primipara 61 cases and multipara 20 cases) and 109 cases in the non-probe-compressing group(including primipara 72 cases and multipara 37 cases). Clinical data, ECV related factors and complications were analyzed and compared between the two groups. <b>Results:</b> (1) The overall success rate of ECV was 64.2% (122/190). There was no significant difference in the success rate of ECV between probe-compressing group and non-probe-compressing group [69.1% (56/81) vs 60.6% (66/109), <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=1.490, <i>P</i>=0.222]. The total vaginal delivery rate after successful ECV was 81.1% (99/122), while 71.1% (54/76) in primipara and 97.8% (45/46) in multipara, respectively. (2) Compare to the non-probe-compressing group, the success rate of ECV in primipara was significantly higher in the probe-compressing group [45.8% (33/72) vs 70.5% (43/61)], but the gestational age was shorter and the height was higher in the probe-compressing group (all <i>P</i><0.05). The success rate of ECV of multipara in the probe-compressing group (65.0%, 13/20) was lower than that in the non-probe-compressing group (89.2%, 33/37), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). (3) Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that abdominal wall compressed by ultrasound probe (<i>OR</i>=2.601, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.113-6.075; <i>P</i>=0.027) and amniotic fluid index (AFI; <i>OR</i>=1.010, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.001-1.020; <i>P</i>=0.028) were positive factors for the successful rate of ECV in primipara pregnant women. (4) The main complication of ECV was transient fetal heart rate reduction (8.9%,17/190), the incidence in the probe-compressing group was significantly higher than that in the non-probe-compressing group [14.8% (12/81) vs 4.6% (5/109); <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=5.967, <i>P</i>=0.015]. No statistical differences were found in rates of complications between the ECV successful and unsuccessful pregnant women, and between probe-compressing and non-probe-compressing groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). No adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes related to ECV were observed. <b>Conclusions:</b> The ultrasonic convex array probe compressing could significantly improve the success rate of ECV in primipara without increasing the incidence of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. The success rate of ECV in primipara is influenced by AFI and operation mode.</p>","PeriodicalId":10050,"journal":{"name":"中华妇产科杂志","volume":"59 6","pages":"427-433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华妇产科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20231226-00280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore the feasibility of using ultrasonic convex array probe compressing abdominal wall to increase success rate of external cephalic version (ECV) without anesthesia in full-term and near-term pregnancy. Methods: Totally 190 singleton and non-cephalic presentation pregnant women in 36-39+4 weeks of gestation performed ECV from April 2019 to August 2023 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were analyzed. According to whether use the ultrasound probe compressing fetal breech or not, the pregnant women were divided into two groups: 81 cases in the probe-compressing group (including primipara 61 cases and multipara 20 cases) and 109 cases in the non-probe-compressing group(including primipara 72 cases and multipara 37 cases). Clinical data, ECV related factors and complications were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: (1) The overall success rate of ECV was 64.2% (122/190). There was no significant difference in the success rate of ECV between probe-compressing group and non-probe-compressing group [69.1% (56/81) vs 60.6% (66/109), χ2=1.490, P=0.222]. The total vaginal delivery rate after successful ECV was 81.1% (99/122), while 71.1% (54/76) in primipara and 97.8% (45/46) in multipara, respectively. (2) Compare to the non-probe-compressing group, the success rate of ECV in primipara was significantly higher in the probe-compressing group [45.8% (33/72) vs 70.5% (43/61)], but the gestational age was shorter and the height was higher in the probe-compressing group (all P<0.05). The success rate of ECV of multipara in the probe-compressing group (65.0%, 13/20) was lower than that in the non-probe-compressing group (89.2%, 33/37), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). (3) Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that abdominal wall compressed by ultrasound probe (OR=2.601, 95%CI: 1.113-6.075; P=0.027) and amniotic fluid index (AFI; OR=1.010, 95%CI: 1.001-1.020; P=0.028) were positive factors for the successful rate of ECV in primipara pregnant women. (4) The main complication of ECV was transient fetal heart rate reduction (8.9%,17/190), the incidence in the probe-compressing group was significantly higher than that in the non-probe-compressing group [14.8% (12/81) vs 4.6% (5/109); χ2=5.967, P=0.015]. No statistical differences were found in rates of complications between the ECV successful and unsuccessful pregnant women, and between probe-compressing and non-probe-compressing groups (all P>0.05). No adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes related to ECV were observed. Conclusions: The ultrasonic convex array probe compressing could significantly improve the success rate of ECV in primipara without increasing the incidence of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. The success rate of ECV in primipara is influenced by AFI and operation mode.
目的探讨在足月和近足月妊娠中使用超声凸阵探头压迫腹壁以提高无麻醉头臀外侧位术(ECV)成功率的可行性。方法分析南京医科大学第一附属医院2019年4月-2023年8月期间为190例孕36-39+4周的单胎、非头位孕妇实施ECV的情况。根据是否使用超声探头压迫胎臀,将孕妇分为两组:探头压迫组81例(其中初产妇61例,多产妇20例),非探头压迫组109例(其中初产妇72例,多产妇37例)。对两组的临床数据、ECV相关因素和并发症进行了分析和比较。结果:(1)ECV 的总成功率为 64.2%(122/190)。探头压迫组和非探头压迫组的 ECV 成功率无明显差异[69.1% (56/81) vs 60.6% (66/109),χ2=1.490,P=0.222]。ECV成功后的总阴道分娩率为81.1%(99/122),初产妇为71.1%(54/76),多产妇为97.8%(45/46)。(2)与非探针压迫组相比,探针压迫组初产妇的ECV成功率明显更高[45.8% (33/72) vs 70.5% (43/61)],但探针压迫组的胎龄更短,身高更高(PP均>0.05)。(3)多变量逻辑回归分析显示,超声探头压迫腹壁(OR=2.601,95%CI:1.113-6.075;P=0.027)和羊水指数(AFI;OR=1.010,95%CI:1.001-1.020;P=0.028)是影响初产妇ECV成功率的积极因素。(4)胎心监护的主要并发症是一过性胎心率下降(8.9%,17/190),探头压迫组的发生率明显高于非探头压迫组[14.8%(12/81) vs 4.6%(5/109);χ2=5.967,P=0.015]。ECV成功和不成功孕妇的并发症发生率,以及探头压迫组和非探头压迫组的并发症发生率均无统计学差异(均P>0.05)。未观察到与ECV相关的不良孕产妇和新生儿结局。结论超声凸阵探头压迫可显著提高初产妇心导管插入术的成功率,且不会增加产妇和胎儿不良结局的发生率。初产妇心导管的成功率受AFI和操作模式的影响。