Real-world clinical and economic outcomes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer enrolled in a clinical trial following comprehensive genomic profiling via liquid biopsy.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.7.660
Julie A Wiedower, Shaun P Forbes, L Jill Tsai, Jiemin Liao, Luis E Raez
{"title":"Real-world clinical and economic outcomes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer enrolled in a clinical trial following comprehensive genomic profiling via liquid biopsy.","authors":"Julie A Wiedower, Shaun P Forbes, L Jill Tsai, Jiemin Liao, Luis E Raez","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.7.660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oncology clinical trial enrollment is strongly recommended for patients with cancer who are not eligible for established and approved therapies. Many trials are specific to biomarker-targeted therapies, which are typically managed as specialty pharmacy services. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of advanced cancers has been shown to detect biomarkers, guide targeted treatment, improve outcomes, and result in the clinical trial enrollment of patients, which is modeled to offset pharmacy costs experienced by US payers, yet payer policy coverage remains inconsistent. A common concern limiting coverage of CGP by payers is the potential of identifying biomarkers beyond guideline-recommended treatments, which creates a perception that insurance companies are being positioned to \"pay for research.\" However, these biomarkers can increase clinical trial eligibility, and specialty pharmacy management may have an interest in maximizing the clinical trial enrollment of members.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate if clinical trial enrollment following liquid biopsy CGP for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is clinically and/or economically impactful from a payer claims perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical and economic outcomes were studied using a real-world clinical genomic database (including payer claims data) from patients with NSCLC who enrolled in clinical trials immediately following liquid biopsy CGP (using Guardant360) and matched NSCLC patient controls also tested with liquid biopsy CGP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Real-world overall survival was significantly (log-rank <i>P</i> < 0.0001) better for patients enrolled in clinical trials with similar costs of care, albeit with more outpatient encounters among those enrolled compared with matched controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results, together with previous analyses, suggest that, in addition to the clinical benefits associated with targeted therapies directed by CGP and other testing approaches, payers and specialty pharmacy managers may consider clinical trial direction and enrollment as a clinical and economic benefit of liquid biopsy CGP and adopt this into coverage decision frameworks and formularies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"30 7","pages":"660-671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11220364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.7.660","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oncology clinical trial enrollment is strongly recommended for patients with cancer who are not eligible for established and approved therapies. Many trials are specific to biomarker-targeted therapies, which are typically managed as specialty pharmacy services. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of advanced cancers has been shown to detect biomarkers, guide targeted treatment, improve outcomes, and result in the clinical trial enrollment of patients, which is modeled to offset pharmacy costs experienced by US payers, yet payer policy coverage remains inconsistent. A common concern limiting coverage of CGP by payers is the potential of identifying biomarkers beyond guideline-recommended treatments, which creates a perception that insurance companies are being positioned to "pay for research." However, these biomarkers can increase clinical trial eligibility, and specialty pharmacy management may have an interest in maximizing the clinical trial enrollment of members.

Objective: To investigate if clinical trial enrollment following liquid biopsy CGP for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is clinically and/or economically impactful from a payer claims perspective.

Methods: Clinical and economic outcomes were studied using a real-world clinical genomic database (including payer claims data) from patients with NSCLC who enrolled in clinical trials immediately following liquid biopsy CGP (using Guardant360) and matched NSCLC patient controls also tested with liquid biopsy CGP.

Results: Real-world overall survival was significantly (log-rank P < 0.0001) better for patients enrolled in clinical trials with similar costs of care, albeit with more outpatient encounters among those enrolled compared with matched controls.

Conclusions: The results, together with previous analyses, suggest that, in addition to the clinical benefits associated with targeted therapies directed by CGP and other testing approaches, payers and specialty pharmacy managers may consider clinical trial direction and enrollment as a clinical and economic benefit of liquid biopsy CGP and adopt this into coverage decision frameworks and formularies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期非小细胞肺癌患者在通过液体活检进行全面基因组分析后加入临床试验的实际临床和经济效果。
背景:我们强烈建议那些不符合接受已获批准的成熟疗法的癌症患者参加肿瘤临床试验。许多试验专门针对生物标志物靶向疗法,通常作为专科药房服务进行管理。晚期癌症的全面基因组剖析(CGP)已被证明可检测生物标记物、指导靶向治疗、改善预后并使患者接受临床试验,其模型可抵消美国支付方的药房成本,但支付方的政策覆盖范围仍不一致。限制支付方覆盖 CGP 的一个常见问题是,除了指南推荐的治疗方法外,还可能识别生物标记物,这让人觉得保险公司被定位为 "为研究付费"。然而,这些生物标志物可以提高临床试验资格,而专科药房管理部门可能希望最大限度地提高会员的临床试验注册率:目的:从支付方理赔的角度研究非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)液体活检 CGP 后临床试验注册是否会产生临床和/或经济影响:使用真实世界的临床基因组数据库(包括支付方索赔数据)研究了NSCLC患者的临床和经济结果,这些患者在液体活检CGP(使用Guardant360)后立即参加了临床试验,而匹配的NSCLC患者对照组也进行了液体活检CGP测试:尽管与匹配对照组相比,参加临床试验的患者门诊就诊次数更多,但他们的实际总生存率明显更高(对数秩P<0.0001),且护理成本相似:这些结果以及之前的分析表明,除了与CGP和其他检测方法指导的靶向治疗相关的临床益处外,付款人和专科药房经理还可以将临床试验的指导和入组视为液体活检CGP的一项临床和经济益处,并将其纳入承保决策框架和处方集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness of caplacizumab in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in the United States. Impact of social determinants of health on esketamine nasal spray initiation among patients with treatment-resistant depression in the United States. Pharmacoequity measurement framework: A tool to reduce health disparities. Estimating the economic impact of blister-packaging on medication adherence and health care costs for a Medicare Advantage health plan. Impact of next-generation sequencing vs polymerase chain reaction testing on payer costs and clinical outcomes throughout the treatment journeys of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1