Development and Psychometric Test of the Inpatients Experiences Measurement Scale (IEMS).

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2024-06-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S457746
Young-Ran Kweon, Keum-Seong Jang, Myeong Back, Mikyoung Lee
{"title":"Development and Psychometric Test of the Inpatients Experiences Measurement Scale (IEMS).","authors":"Young-Ran Kweon, Keum-Seong Jang, Myeong Back, Mikyoung Lee","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S457746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In South Korea, hospitalized patients' experiences significantly impact satisfaction and treatment outcomes. This study developed and evaluated the Inpatients Experience Measurement Scale (IEMS) for its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Participants from three hospitals were recruited using convenience sampling. Scale item generation involved patient interviews and a Delphi survey with experts. Psychometric testing used Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with 150 participants and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with 151 participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 301 patients participated, resulting in a 20-item scale across four factors: \"Care Quality and Information Provision\", \"Patient Safety and Dietary Services\", \"Facility and Comfort Infrastructure\", and \"Comprehensive Patient Support Services\". Rated on a 5-point Likert scale, the scale showed a high Content Validity Index (CVI) over 0.80. EFA explained 61.43% of the variance. The four-factor model was validated using CFA with favorable fit indices. The IEMS demonstrated strong convergent validity, supported by high composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE) values. Significant correlations with the Patient Satisfaction Scale reinforced its convergent validity. Discriminant validity was confirmed, and all reliability measures exceeded the minimum threshold of 0.80.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IEMS effectively captures inpatients' experiences, demonstrating robust reliability and validity. This scale is a valuable tool for assessing patient experiences, facilitating enhancements in patient care and satisfaction within hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"18 ","pages":"1359-1372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S457746","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In South Korea, hospitalized patients' experiences significantly impact satisfaction and treatment outcomes. This study developed and evaluated the Inpatients Experience Measurement Scale (IEMS) for its psychometric properties.

Patients and methods: Participants from three hospitals were recruited using convenience sampling. Scale item generation involved patient interviews and a Delphi survey with experts. Psychometric testing used Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with 150 participants and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with 151 participants.

Results: A total of 301 patients participated, resulting in a 20-item scale across four factors: "Care Quality and Information Provision", "Patient Safety and Dietary Services", "Facility and Comfort Infrastructure", and "Comprehensive Patient Support Services". Rated on a 5-point Likert scale, the scale showed a high Content Validity Index (CVI) over 0.80. EFA explained 61.43% of the variance. The four-factor model was validated using CFA with favorable fit indices. The IEMS demonstrated strong convergent validity, supported by high composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE) values. Significant correlations with the Patient Satisfaction Scale reinforced its convergent validity. Discriminant validity was confirmed, and all reliability measures exceeded the minimum threshold of 0.80.

Conclusion: The IEMS effectively captures inpatients' experiences, demonstrating robust reliability and validity. This scale is a valuable tool for assessing patient experiences, facilitating enhancements in patient care and satisfaction within hospital settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院病人经历测量量表(IEMS)的开发和心理测试。
目的:在韩国,住院病人的经历对满意度和治疗效果有很大影响。本研究开发并评估了住院病人体验测量量表(IEMS)的心理测量特性:采用便利抽样法从三家医院招募参与者。量表项目的生成包括患者访谈和专家德尔菲调查。心理测量测试采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和确证性因子分析(CFA),前者有 150 名参与者,后者有 151 名参与者:结果:共有 301 名患者参与了测试,测试结果为 20 个项目的量表,包含四个因子:结果:共有 301 名患者参与了问卷调查,共产生了 20 个项目的量表,包括四个因子:"护理质量和信息提供"、"患者安全和饮食服务"、"设施和舒适度基础设施 "以及 "全面的患者支持服务"。该量表采用 5 点李克特量表,内容效度指数(CVI)超过 0.80。EFA 解释了 61.43% 的方差。四因素模型通过 CFA 验证,拟合指数良好。综合信度(CR)和平均方差提取(AVE)值较高,证明 IEMS 具有较强的收敛效度。与患者满意度量表的显著相关性加强了其收敛效度。判别效度也得到了证实,所有信度测量值均超过了 0.80 的最低临界值:结论:IEMS 能有效捕捉住院患者的体验,具有很高的信度和效度。该量表是评估患者体验的重要工具,有助于提高医院的患者护理水平和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Adherence to Health Behaviors Research: Reflections on Current Methods and Future Directions [Letter]. Public Perceptions of Surgeon Attire in Saudi Arabia. Associations of Social Psychological Factors and OHRQoL in Periodontitis Patients: A Structural Equation Modeling Study. Comparing Patient Satisfaction with Automated Drug Dispensing System and Traditional Drug Dispensing System: A Cross-Sectional Study. Development and Testing of a Multi-Component Intervention to Improve Medication Literacy in Glaucoma Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1