Self-assessment, and not continuous training, improves basic open suturing skills.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2024.2374101
Vera Hillemans, Otmar Buyne, Ivo de Blaauw, Sanne M B I Botden, Bas H Verhoeven, Maja Joosten
{"title":"Self-assessment, and not continuous training, improves basic open suturing skills.","authors":"Vera Hillemans, Otmar Buyne, Ivo de Blaauw, Sanne M B I Botden, Bas H Verhoeven, Maja Joosten","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2374101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To develop and maintain suturing skills, clinical exposure is important. When clinical exposure cannot be guaranteed, an adequate training schedule for suturing skills is required. This study evaluates the effect of continuous training, 'reflection before practice' and self-assessment on basic open suturing skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical students performed four basic suturing tasks on a simulation set up before ('pre-test') and after their surgical rotation ('after-test'). Participants were divided in three groups; the 'clinical exposure group' (<i>n</i> = 44) had clinical exposure during their rotation only, the 'continuous training group' (<i>n</i> = 16) completed a suturing interval training during their rotation and the 'self-assessment group' (<i>n</i> = 16) also completed a suturing interval training, but with the use of reflection before practice and self-assessment. Parameters measured by a tracking system during the suturing tasks and a calculated 'composite score' were compared between groups and test-moments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly better composite score was found at the after-test compared to the pre-test for all groups for all basic suturing tasks (0.001 ≤ <i>p</i> ≤ 0.049). The self-assessment group scored better at the pre-test than the other two groups for all tasks, except for 'knot tying by hand' (0.004 ≤ <i>p</i> ≤ 0.063). However, this group did not score better at the after-test for all tasks, compared to the other two groups. This resulted in a smaller delta of time ('transcutaneous suture', <i>p</i> = 0.013), distance ('Donati suture' and 'intracutaneous suture', 0.005 ≤ <i>p</i> ≤ 0.009) or composite score (all tasks, except for knot tying by hand, 0.007 ≤ <i>p</i> ≤ 0.061) in the self-assessment group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reflection before practice and self-assessment during continuous training of basic open suturing tasks, may improve surgical skills at the start of the learning curve.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11218580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2024.2374101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To develop and maintain suturing skills, clinical exposure is important. When clinical exposure cannot be guaranteed, an adequate training schedule for suturing skills is required. This study evaluates the effect of continuous training, 'reflection before practice' and self-assessment on basic open suturing skills.

Methods: Medical students performed four basic suturing tasks on a simulation set up before ('pre-test') and after their surgical rotation ('after-test'). Participants were divided in three groups; the 'clinical exposure group' (n = 44) had clinical exposure during their rotation only, the 'continuous training group' (n = 16) completed a suturing interval training during their rotation and the 'self-assessment group' (n = 16) also completed a suturing interval training, but with the use of reflection before practice and self-assessment. Parameters measured by a tracking system during the suturing tasks and a calculated 'composite score' were compared between groups and test-moments.

Results: A significantly better composite score was found at the after-test compared to the pre-test for all groups for all basic suturing tasks (0.001 ≤ p ≤ 0.049). The self-assessment group scored better at the pre-test than the other two groups for all tasks, except for 'knot tying by hand' (0.004 ≤ p ≤ 0.063). However, this group did not score better at the after-test for all tasks, compared to the other two groups. This resulted in a smaller delta of time ('transcutaneous suture', p = 0.013), distance ('Donati suture' and 'intracutaneous suture', 0.005 ≤ p ≤ 0.009) or composite score (all tasks, except for knot tying by hand, 0.007 ≤ p ≤ 0.061) in the self-assessment group.

Conclusion: Reflection before practice and self-assessment during continuous training of basic open suturing tasks, may improve surgical skills at the start of the learning curve.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我评估而非持续培训可提高基本的开放式缝合技能。
背景:要培养和保持缝合技能,临床接触非常重要。在无法保证临床接触的情况下,需要制定适当的缝合技能培训计划。本研究评估了持续培训、"练习前反思 "和自我评估对基本开放式缝合技能的影响:方法:医科学生在外科轮转前("前测")和轮转后("后测")在模拟装置上完成四项基本缝合任务。参与者被分为三组:"临床接触组"(44 人)仅在轮转期间进行临床接触,"持续训练组"(16 人)在轮转期间完成缝合间歇训练,"自我评估组"(16 人)也完成缝合间歇训练,但在练习和自我评估前进行反思。通过跟踪系统测量的缝合任务参数和计算出的 "综合得分 "在不同组别和测试时刻进行了比较:结果:在所有基本缝合任务中,各组的后测综合得分均明显高于前测(0.001 ≤ p ≤ 0.049)。除 "手工打结"(0.004 ≤ p ≤ 0.063)外,自我评估组在所有任务的测试前得分均高于其他两组。然而,与其他两组相比,该组在所有任务的后测得分并没有更高。这导致自我评估组在时间("经皮缝合",p = 0.013)、距离("多纳蒂缝合 "和 "皮内缝合",0.005 ≤ p ≤ 0.009)或综合得分(除手工打结外的所有任务,0.007 ≤ p ≤ 0.061)方面的差距较小:结论:在基本开放式缝合任务的持续培训中,练习前的反思和自我评估可在学习曲线的起始阶段提高手术技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
期刊最新文献
Medical law; promotion of medicine curriculum: a letter to editor. Tips for developing a coaching program in medical education. High- and low-achieving international medical students' perceptions of the factors influencing their academic performance at Chinese universities. A Medical Education Research Library: key research topics and associated experts. Financial barriers and inequity in medical education in India: challenges to training a diverse and representative healthcare workforce.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1