Utility and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TMC): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Lung India Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_606_23
Pranay Sai Chandragiri, Anshula Tayal, Saurabh Mittal, Neha Kawatra Madan, Pawan Tiwari, Vijay Hadda, Anant Mohan, Karan Madan
{"title":"Utility and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TMC): A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Pranay Sai Chandragiri, Anshula Tayal, Saurabh Mittal, Neha Kawatra Madan, Pawan Tiwari, Vijay Hadda, Anant Mohan, Karan Madan","doi":"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_606_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modalities to improve tissue acquisition during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) have been investigated. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TMC) is a modality to obtain larger histological samples by inserting a cryoprobe into the mediastinal lesion. We aimed to study the diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-TMC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search of the PubMed and Embase databases to extract the relevant studies. We then performed a meta-analysis to calculate the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TMC and compare it with EBUS-TBNA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following a systematic search, we identified 14 relevant studies (869 patients undergoing EBUS-TMC and EBUS-TBNA). We then performed a meta-analysis of the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TMC and EBUS-TBNA from studies wherein both procedures were performed. The pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TMC was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89%-95%). The pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA was 81% (95% CI, 77%-85%). The risk difference in yield was 11% (95% CI, 6%-15%, I2 = 0%) when EBUS-TMC and EBUS-TBNA were compared. The only complication reported commonly with EBUS-TMC was minor bleeding. The complication rate was comparable with EBUS-TBNA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EBUS-TMC provides a greater diagnostic yield with a similar risk of adverse events compared to EBUS-TBNA. Future studies are required to clearly establish which patients are most likely to benefit from this modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":47462,"journal":{"name":"Lung India","volume":"41 4","pages":"288-298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_606_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Modalities to improve tissue acquisition during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) have been investigated. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TMC) is a modality to obtain larger histological samples by inserting a cryoprobe into the mediastinal lesion. We aimed to study the diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-TMC.

Methods: We performed a systematic search of the PubMed and Embase databases to extract the relevant studies. We then performed a meta-analysis to calculate the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TMC and compare it with EBUS-TBNA.

Results: Following a systematic search, we identified 14 relevant studies (869 patients undergoing EBUS-TMC and EBUS-TBNA). We then performed a meta-analysis of the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TMC and EBUS-TBNA from studies wherein both procedures were performed. The pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TMC was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89%-95%). The pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA was 81% (95% CI, 77%-85%). The risk difference in yield was 11% (95% CI, 6%-15%, I2 = 0%) when EBUS-TMC and EBUS-TBNA were compared. The only complication reported commonly with EBUS-TMC was minor bleeding. The complication rate was comparable with EBUS-TBNA.

Conclusion: EBUS-TMC provides a greater diagnostic yield with a similar risk of adverse events compared to EBUS-TBNA. Future studies are required to clearly establish which patients are most likely to benefit from this modality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支气管内超声引导下经支气管纵隔冷冻活组织检查(EBUS-TMC)的实用性和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:人们一直在研究如何改进支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸术(EBUS-TBNA)的组织采集方式。支气管内超声引导下经支气管纵隔冷冻活检(EBUS-TMC)是一种通过将冷冻探针插入纵隔病变部位获取较大组织样本的方法。我们的目的是研究 EBUS-TMC 的诊断率和安全性:我们对 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库进行了系统检索,以提取相关研究。然后进行荟萃分析,计算 EBUS-TMC 的诊断率,并与 EBUS-TBNA 进行比较:经过系统检索,我们确定了 14 项相关研究(869 名患者接受了 EBUS-TMC 和 EBUS-TBNA)。然后,我们对进行了两种手术的研究中 EBUS-TMC 和 EBUS-TBNA 的诊断率进行了荟萃分析。EBUS-TMC 的汇总诊断率为 92%(95% 置信区间 [CI],89%-95%)。EBUS-TBNA 的汇总诊断率为 81%(95% 置信区间 [CI],77%-85%)。比较 EBUS-TMC 和 EBUS-TBNA 时,诊断率的风险差异为 11% (95% CI, 6%-15%, I2 = 0%)。EBUS-TMC 常见的唯一并发症是轻微出血。结论:EBUS-TMC和EBUS-TBNA的并发症发生率相当:结论:与 EBUS-TBNA 相比,EBUS-TMC 可提供更高的诊断率,但发生不良事件的风险相似。未来的研究需要明确确定哪些患者最有可能从这种方式中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lung India
Lung India RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Stoned" airways: Bilateral airway foreign body (pebble) aspiration following a road traffic accident. An uncommon cause of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure managed with endoscopic ultrasound. Bronchial anthracofibrosis beyond bronchial involvement causing pulmonary artery stenosis. Bronchodilator reversibility and eosinophilic biomarkers in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Case series of Y shaped self-expanding metallic stents (Y-SEMS) for central airway obstruction - Experience of deployment with 'Single Guide Wire' technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1