The process of developing and piloting a tool in the Maldives and Zimbabwe for assessing disability inclusion in health systems performance

Hannah Kuper , Phyllis Heydt , Shaffa Hameed , Tracey Smythe , Tapiwanashe Kujinga
{"title":"The process of developing and piloting a tool in the Maldives and Zimbabwe for assessing disability inclusion in health systems performance","authors":"Hannah Kuper ,&nbsp;Phyllis Heydt ,&nbsp;Shaffa Hameed ,&nbsp;Tracey Smythe ,&nbsp;Tapiwanashe Kujinga","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2024.100014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are 1.3 billion people with disabilities globally. On average, they experience greater healthcare needs and more barriers accessing healthcare. Yet, health systems have failed to adequately include people with disabilities. The purpose of this study was to develop and pilot-test a tool for assessing disability inclusion in health system performance. We presented the “Missing Billion” disability-inclusive health system framework, which includes 4 system-level components and 5 service delivery components, and outputs and outcomes. We developed a tool, consisting of 48 indicators related to the framework components. We consulted international experts, who considered the framework and indicator set to be logical and comprehensive. The tool was pilot-tested in the Maldives (2020) and Zimbabwe (2021), working with local researchers to collect relevant data through document review and key informant interviews. The pilot data demonstrated that collecting data on the indicators was feasible. The tool highlighted areas where the health systems were performing well in terms of disability inclusion (e.g. governance) and other areas where there were large gaps (e.g. leadership) or lack of data (e.g. accessibility, outputs and outcomes). The indicators were updated and refined. We established a process for undertaking the assessment, highlighting the importance of leadership and ownership by the Ministry of Health, to facilitate data collection and implementation of recommendations. In conclusion, this new tool for assessing disability inclusion in health systems performance can help to identify key issues and guide and monitor action.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100014"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949856224000072/pdfft?md5=1f1a30c36cb46067adc58920c31ade04&pid=1-s2.0-S2949856224000072-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM - Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949856224000072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are 1.3 billion people with disabilities globally. On average, they experience greater healthcare needs and more barriers accessing healthcare. Yet, health systems have failed to adequately include people with disabilities. The purpose of this study was to develop and pilot-test a tool for assessing disability inclusion in health system performance. We presented the “Missing Billion” disability-inclusive health system framework, which includes 4 system-level components and 5 service delivery components, and outputs and outcomes. We developed a tool, consisting of 48 indicators related to the framework components. We consulted international experts, who considered the framework and indicator set to be logical and comprehensive. The tool was pilot-tested in the Maldives (2020) and Zimbabwe (2021), working with local researchers to collect relevant data through document review and key informant interviews. The pilot data demonstrated that collecting data on the indicators was feasible. The tool highlighted areas where the health systems were performing well in terms of disability inclusion (e.g. governance) and other areas where there were large gaps (e.g. leadership) or lack of data (e.g. accessibility, outputs and outcomes). The indicators were updated and refined. We established a process for undertaking the assessment, highlighting the importance of leadership and ownership by the Ministry of Health, to facilitate data collection and implementation of recommendations. In conclusion, this new tool for assessing disability inclusion in health systems performance can help to identify key issues and guide and monitor action.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在马尔代夫和津巴布韦开发和试用评估残疾问题纳入卫生系统绩效的工具的过程
全球有 13 亿残疾人。平均而言,他们的医疗保健需求更大,获得医疗保健的障碍更多。然而,医疗系统却未能充分纳入残疾人。本研究的目的是开发并试点测试一种工具,用于评估医疗系统绩效中的残疾包容性。我们提出了 "缺失的十亿"(Missing Billion)残障包容性医疗系统框架,其中包括 4 个系统级组件和 5 个服务提供组件,以及产出和成果。我们开发了一个工具,由与框架组成部分相关的 48 个指标组成。我们咨询了国际专家,他们认为该框架和指标集既合理又全面。该工具在马尔代夫(2020 年)和津巴布韦(2021 年)进行了试点测试,与当地研究人员合作,通过文件审查和关键信息提供者访谈收集相关数据。试点数据表明,收集指标数据是可行的。该工具强调了卫生系统在残疾包容方面表现良好的领域(如治理)和存在巨大差距的其他领域(如领导力)或缺乏数据的领域(如可及性、产出和成果)。对指标进行了更新和完善。我们制定了开展评估的程序,强调了卫生部领导力和自主权的重要性,以促进数据收集和建议实施。总之,这一新工具可用于评估残疾问题纳入卫生系统的绩效,有助于确定关键问题并指导和监督行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards a common understanding of gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation for health programs and interventions: Evidence from a scoping review Theoretical foundations and mechanisms of health systems responsiveness: a realist synthesis Factors influencing healthcare facility selection in an urban setting in Lao PDR: Findings from a qualitative study Understanding the complex knowledge economy toward antimicrobial stewardship in West Bengal, India Brazilian healthcare bureaucracies and the production of antimicrobial resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1