Do micro-celebrities preserve social roles? Differences between secular and religious female Instagram lifestyle influencers

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Technology in Society Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102642
Tal Laor
{"title":"Do micro-celebrities preserve social roles? Differences between secular and religious female Instagram lifestyle influencers","authors":"Tal Laor","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, with the growth of social networks such as Instagram, network influencers and micro-celebrities with a mass audience of followers have begun to emerge. Corporations and companies supposedly use through these influencers to create a more direct connection with consumers through the “daily lives” of followers.</p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the differences in the activities and perceptions of secular and religious “lifestyle” network influencers and to determine whether Instagram preserves social roles. The current study is based on an integrated quantitative and qualitative research method. First, we analyzed the Instagram pages of 61 influencers (27 religious and 34 secular influencers) and then conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with twenty influencers, half of whom were secular and half were religious. The main finding regarding differences between secular and religious influencers indicates that secular influencers exploit female sexuality and stereotypes, whereas religious influencers are less exposed to and do not exploit their femininity. Through the prism of symbolic interactionism theory, this study argues that micro-celebrities may maintain the social roles that society expects them to present. The study also suggests that collaborations with corporations serve to promote consumerism and corporate interests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001908","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, with the growth of social networks such as Instagram, network influencers and micro-celebrities with a mass audience of followers have begun to emerge. Corporations and companies supposedly use through these influencers to create a more direct connection with consumers through the “daily lives” of followers.

The aim of this study was to compare the differences in the activities and perceptions of secular and religious “lifestyle” network influencers and to determine whether Instagram preserves social roles. The current study is based on an integrated quantitative and qualitative research method. First, we analyzed the Instagram pages of 61 influencers (27 religious and 34 secular influencers) and then conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with twenty influencers, half of whom were secular and half were religious. The main finding regarding differences between secular and religious influencers indicates that secular influencers exploit female sexuality and stereotypes, whereas religious influencers are less exposed to and do not exploit their femininity. Through the prism of symbolic interactionism theory, this study argues that micro-celebrities may maintain the social roles that society expects them to present. The study also suggests that collaborations with corporations serve to promote consumerism and corporate interests.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微名人会维护社会角色吗?世俗和宗教女性 Instagram 生活方式影响者之间的差异
近年来,随着 Instagram 等社交网络的发展,拥有大量粉丝的网络影响者和微名人开始出现。本研究旨在比较世俗和宗教 "生活方式 "网络影响者的活动和观念差异,并确定 Instagram 是否保留了社会角色。本研究采用定量和定性相结合的研究方法。首先,我们分析了 61 位影响者(27 位宗教影响者和 34 位世俗影响者)的 Instagram 页面,然后对 20 位影响者进行了半结构化深度访谈,其中世俗影响者和宗教影响者各占一半。关于世俗和宗教影响者之间差异的主要发现表明,世俗影响者利用了女性的性特征和刻板印象,而宗教影响者较少接触到也没有利用她们的女性特征。本研究通过符号互动主义理论的棱镜,认为微观名人可能会保持社会期望他们呈现的社会角色。本研究还认为,与企业的合作有助于促进消费主义和企业利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
期刊最新文献
Potential risk and efficiency analysis of decision-making dilemmas in connected dual-vehicle interactions at uncontrolled intersections Knowledge source switching under state interventions of latecomer regions: A case study of Shenzhen Can cluster analysis enrich the innovation resistance theory? The case of mobile payment usage in Italy Pathway towards SME competitiveness: Digital capability and digital business model innovation Forecasting the evolution of urban mobility: The influence of anthropomorphism and social responsiveness in the transition from human to automated driving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1