General practitioner and patient perspectives on intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis: Treatment duration and obstacles to adherence, findings from a recent survey

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY World Allergy Organization Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100925
Désirée E.S. Larenas-Linnemann MD , Pornanan Domthong MD , Renata C. Di Francesco MD, PhD , Ruperto González-Pérez MD, PhD , Manish Verma MD
{"title":"General practitioner and patient perspectives on intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis: Treatment duration and obstacles to adherence, findings from a recent survey","authors":"Désirée E.S. Larenas-Linnemann MD ,&nbsp;Pornanan Domthong MD ,&nbsp;Renata C. Di Francesco MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ruperto González-Pérez MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Manish Verma MD","doi":"10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>Currently, there are no guideline recommendations for the duration of intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR). We aimed to catalogue real-world AR-INCS prescription patterns.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This multicenter, non-interventional, cross-sectional study used online general practitioner (GP) and patient surveys from 4 countries. Eligible GPs had 3–35 years of practical experience, regularly prescribed INCSs for AR treatment, and had managed ≥5 patients with AR per month according to Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines in the previous year. Eligible patients with AR were non-pregnant females or males, aged 18–65 years, previous AR-INCS users (≥12 months), and receiving GP-prescribed AR therapy. Survey participants were from countries with 15–50% AR prevalence and mostly prescription-only INCS use of ≥100 million units annually (Brazil, Mexico, Spain, Thailand). GP surveys and GP-completed patient record forms (PRFs) gathered AR-care and INCS-use data over 10 months; each GP completed patient record forms (PRFs) for 3 patients with AR under their care. The patient survey reflected actual AR-INCS experience, treatment duration, and adherence factors from patient perspectives. The target sample size was 75 GPs, 75 patients, and ≥30 respondents per country.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 900 GP-PRFs, the mean GP-recommended AR-INCS durations reported were 8.4 (Brazil), 8.3 (Mexico), 5.4 (Spain), and 6.4 (Thailand) weeks. From 300 patient surveys, mean reported INCS recommended durations were 6.4 (Brazil), 5.1 (Mexico), 4.0 (Spain), and 4.9 (Thailand) weeks; reported actual use durations were 6.2, 4.8, 3.6, and 6.4 weeks, respectively. The most frequent GP-PRF-reported factors influencing AR-INCS treatment duration were symptom severity (76–85%), symptom recurrence (49–73%), and existing comorbidities (33–57%). The most frequent GP-PRF-reported obstacles to adherence included forgetting to take medication regularly (54–100%), subsiding symptoms (42–91%), and being unable to continue activities (33–51%). Subsiding symptoms (36–53%) and reaching the prescription duration end (20–51%) were most frequent obstacles reported by the patient survey. Patients from all surveyed countries indicated that they visited the GP, a different physician, or a pharmacy for assistance with symptom recurrence; some patients also self-medicated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Real-world AR-INCS prescription durations vary between countries and actual use tends to be shorter than prescribed. Understanding underlying factors may support appropriate AR-INCS use. The study was not powered to statistically compare intercountry differences; hence, comparisons have not been drawn, and the small sample may not reflect a complete picture of clinical practice and patients with AR in each country.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54295,"journal":{"name":"World Allergy Organization Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455124000565/pdfft?md5=065a6090a7c0857a434f54d6aa9a1000&pid=1-s2.0-S1939455124000565-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Allergy Organization Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455124000565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Currently, there are no guideline recommendations for the duration of intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR). We aimed to catalogue real-world AR-INCS prescription patterns.

Materials and methods

This multicenter, non-interventional, cross-sectional study used online general practitioner (GP) and patient surveys from 4 countries. Eligible GPs had 3–35 years of practical experience, regularly prescribed INCSs for AR treatment, and had managed ≥5 patients with AR per month according to Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines in the previous year. Eligible patients with AR were non-pregnant females or males, aged 18–65 years, previous AR-INCS users (≥12 months), and receiving GP-prescribed AR therapy. Survey participants were from countries with 15–50% AR prevalence and mostly prescription-only INCS use of ≥100 million units annually (Brazil, Mexico, Spain, Thailand). GP surveys and GP-completed patient record forms (PRFs) gathered AR-care and INCS-use data over 10 months; each GP completed patient record forms (PRFs) for 3 patients with AR under their care. The patient survey reflected actual AR-INCS experience, treatment duration, and adherence factors from patient perspectives. The target sample size was 75 GPs, 75 patients, and ≥30 respondents per country.

Results

From 900 GP-PRFs, the mean GP-recommended AR-INCS durations reported were 8.4 (Brazil), 8.3 (Mexico), 5.4 (Spain), and 6.4 (Thailand) weeks. From 300 patient surveys, mean reported INCS recommended durations were 6.4 (Brazil), 5.1 (Mexico), 4.0 (Spain), and 4.9 (Thailand) weeks; reported actual use durations were 6.2, 4.8, 3.6, and 6.4 weeks, respectively. The most frequent GP-PRF-reported factors influencing AR-INCS treatment duration were symptom severity (76–85%), symptom recurrence (49–73%), and existing comorbidities (33–57%). The most frequent GP-PRF-reported obstacles to adherence included forgetting to take medication regularly (54–100%), subsiding symptoms (42–91%), and being unable to continue activities (33–51%). Subsiding symptoms (36–53%) and reaching the prescription duration end (20–51%) were most frequent obstacles reported by the patient survey. Patients from all surveyed countries indicated that they visited the GP, a different physician, or a pharmacy for assistance with symptom recurrence; some patients also self-medicated.

Conclusions

Real-world AR-INCS prescription durations vary between countries and actual use tends to be shorter than prescribed. Understanding underlying factors may support appropriate AR-INCS use. The study was not powered to statistically compare intercountry differences; hence, comparisons have not been drawn, and the small sample may not reflect a complete picture of clinical practice and patients with AR in each country.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科医生和患者对鼻内皮质类固醇治疗过敏性鼻炎的看法:最近一项调查的结果:治疗持续时间和坚持治疗的障碍
背景和目的目前,过敏性鼻炎(AR)鼻内皮质类固醇(INCS)治疗的持续时间尚无指南建议。材料和方法这项多中心、非干预、横断面研究使用了来自 4 个国家的在线全科医生(GP)和患者调查。符合条件的全科医生具有 3-35 年的实际工作经验,定期开具 INCS 用于 AR 治疗,并且在过去一年中根据过敏性鼻炎及其对哮喘的影响(ARIA)指南每月管理的 AR 患者≥5 人。符合条件的 AR 患者为非怀孕女性或男性,年龄在 18-65 岁之间,曾使用过 AR-INCS(≥12 个月),并正在接受全科医生开具的 AR 治疗处方。调查参与者来自 AR 患病率为 15%-50% 的国家,这些国家大多仅凭处方使用 INCS,年使用量≥1 亿单位(巴西、墨西哥、西班牙、泰国)。全科医生调查和全科医生填写的患者记录表(PRF)收集了 10 个月内 AR 护理和 INCS 使用数据;每位全科医生填写了其护理的 3 位 AR 患者的患者记录表(PRF)。患者调查从患者角度反映了 AR-INCS 的实际体验、治疗持续时间和依从性因素。结果从 900 份全科医生病历表中,全科医生推荐的 AR-INCS 平均疗程分别为 8.4 周(巴西)、8.3 周(墨西哥)、5.4 周(西班牙)和 6.4 周(泰国)。在 300 份患者调查中,报告的 INCS 推荐持续时间平均值分别为 6.4 周(巴西)、5.1 周(墨西哥)、4.0 周(西班牙)和 4.9 周(泰国);报告的实际使用持续时间分别为 6.2 周、4.8 周、3.6 周和 6.4 周。GP-PRF 最常报告的影响 AR-INCS 治疗持续时间的因素是症状严重程度(76-85%)、症状复发(49-73%)和现有合并症(33-57%)。GP-PRF 报告的最常见的坚持治疗障碍包括忘记按时服药(54%-100%)、症状减轻(42%-91%)和无法继续活动(33%-51%)。症状缓解(36-53%)和达到处方期限(20-51%)是患者调查报告中最常见的障碍。所有接受调查国家的患者都表示,如果症状复发,他们会去全科医生、其他医生或药房寻求帮助;一些患者还会自行用药。了解潜在的因素有助于适当使用抗逆转录病毒药物。这项研究没有对国家间的差异进行统计比较,因此无法得出比较结果,而且样本较少可能无法反映各国临床实践和 AR 患者的全貌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Allergy Organization Journal
World Allergy Organization Journal Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The official pubication of the World Allergy Organization, the World Allergy Organization Journal (WAOjournal) publishes original mechanistic, translational, and clinical research on the topics of allergy, asthma, anaphylaxis, and clincial immunology, as well as reviews, guidelines, and position papers that contribute to the improvement of patient care. WAOjournal publishes research on the growth of allergy prevalence within the scope of single countries, country comparisons, and practical global issues and regulations, or threats to the allergy specialty. The Journal invites the submissions of all authors interested in publishing on current global problems in allergy, asthma, anaphylaxis, and immunology. Of particular interest are the immunological consequences of climate change and the subsequent systematic transformations in food habits and their consequences for the allergy/immunology discipline.
期刊最新文献
Time to ACT-UP: Update on precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) Eosinophilic esophagitis and inhalant antigens: Pointing out the roles of allergic rhinitis, immunotherapy and biologic treatment Inverse association between the molecular spreading of IgE to grass pollen and the IgE response to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus among children with seasonal allergic rhinitis Integrated machine learning and bioinformatic analysis of mitochondrial-related signature in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps Epinephrine infusion as an adjuvant treatment for breakthrough reactions during desensitization to methotrexate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1