Will the GDPR Restrain Health Data Access Bodies Under the European Health Data Space (EHDS)?

IF 3.3 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Computer Law & Security Review Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105993
Paul Quinn, Erika Ellyne, Cong Yao
{"title":"Will the GDPR Restrain Health Data Access Bodies Under the European Health Data Space (EHDS)?","authors":"Paul Quinn,&nbsp;Erika Ellyne,&nbsp;Cong Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The plans for a European Health Data Space (EHDS) envisage an ambitious and radical platform that will inter alia make the sharing of secondary health data easier. It will encourage the systematic sharing of health data and provide a legal framework for it to be shared by Health Data Access Bodies (HDABs) based in each of the Member States. Whilst this promises to bring about major benefits for research and innovation, it also raises serious questions given the intrinsic sensitivity of health data. Fears concerning privacy harms on the individual level and detrimental effects on the societal level have been raised. This article discusses two of the main protective pillars designed to allay such concerns. The first is that the proposal clearly outlines several contexts for which a Health Data Access Permit (HDAP) should and should not be granted. The second is that a request for an HDAP must also be compliant with the GDPR (inter alia requiring a valid legal basis and respecting data processing principles such as ‘minimization’ and ‘storage limitation’). As this article discusses, in some instances the need to have a valid legal basis under the GDPR may make it difficult to obtain a data access permit, in particular for some of the commercially orientated grounds outlined within the EHDS proposal. A further important issue concerns the ability of HDABs to analyse the compatibility permit requests under the GDPR and relevant national law at both speed and scale.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 105993"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924000608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The plans for a European Health Data Space (EHDS) envisage an ambitious and radical platform that will inter alia make the sharing of secondary health data easier. It will encourage the systematic sharing of health data and provide a legal framework for it to be shared by Health Data Access Bodies (HDABs) based in each of the Member States. Whilst this promises to bring about major benefits for research and innovation, it also raises serious questions given the intrinsic sensitivity of health data. Fears concerning privacy harms on the individual level and detrimental effects on the societal level have been raised. This article discusses two of the main protective pillars designed to allay such concerns. The first is that the proposal clearly outlines several contexts for which a Health Data Access Permit (HDAP) should and should not be granted. The second is that a request for an HDAP must also be compliant with the GDPR (inter alia requiring a valid legal basis and respecting data processing principles such as ‘minimization’ and ‘storage limitation’). As this article discusses, in some instances the need to have a valid legal basis under the GDPR may make it difficult to obtain a data access permit, in particular for some of the commercially orientated grounds outlined within the EHDS proposal. A further important issue concerns the ability of HDABs to analyse the compatibility permit requests under the GDPR and relevant national law at both speed and scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GDPR 是否会限制欧洲健康数据空间 (EHDS) 下的健康数据访问机构?
欧洲健康数据空间(EHDS)计划设想了一个雄心勃勃的激进平台,除其他外,该平台将使二级健康数据的共享更加容易。它将鼓励系统地共享健康数据,并为设在各成员国的健康数据访问机构(HDABs)共享健康数据提供法律框架。虽然这有望为研究和创新带来重大益处,但鉴于健康数据固有的敏感性,它也提出了严重的问题。人们担心个人隐私会受到损害,社会层面也会受到不利影响。本文讨论了旨在消除这些担忧的两个主要保护支柱。首先,该提案明确概述了应该和不应该获得健康数据访问许可(HDAP)的几种情况。其次,HDAP 申请还必须符合 GDPR 的规定(特别是要求有有效的法律依据,并遵守 "最小化 "和 "存储限制 "等数据处理原则)。正如本文所讨论的,在某些情况下,根据 GDPR 需要有有效的法律依据可能会导致难以获得数据访问许可,特别是对于 EHDS 建议中概述的一些商业导向的理由。另一个重要问题涉及 HDAB 根据 GDPR 和相关国家法律对兼容性许可申请进行快速和大规模分析的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.
期刊最新文献
Between progress and caution: LegalTech's promise in transforming personal credit risk management in China Facial recognition technology in law enforcement: Regulating data analysis of another kind Open or closing doors? The influence of ‘digital sovereignty’ in the EU's Cybersecurity Strategy on cybersecurity of open-source software Botnet defense under EU data protection law Automated vehicles, the ‘driver dilemma’, stopping powers, and paradigms of regulating road traffic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1