Toward a tool for evaluating corpus-based word lists for use in english language teaching contexts

Sarah Alzeer , Paul Thompson
{"title":"Toward a tool for evaluating corpus-based word lists for use in english language teaching contexts","authors":"Sarah Alzeer ,&nbsp;Paul Thompson","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the proliferation of large corpora and the availability of sophisticated corpus-analysis tools, the number of corpus-based word lists targeting different types of vocabulary has rapidly increased during the last 20 years. This wide variety of lists has caused problems for practitioners, for whom it is not always easy to decide which list is most useful for their purpose and context. Given the paucity of systematic guidance on how to evaluate word lists, this study aimed to construct an evaluation tool that is based on Nation's (2016) framework of critiquing word lists, but is reformulated for a different purpose and for different target users, in order to increase the applicability of information derived from corpus analysis (the word lists). Constructed based on a thorough literature review, and informed by practitioners’ views and uses of word lists, along with consultations with ELT practitioners and word list experts, the tool targets ELT practitioners such as teachers, curriculum and assessment coordinators, and materials developers involved in directing vocabulary acquisition. The tool caters to practitioners with different levels of expertise and knowledge—especially those who are unfamiliar with the intricacies of developing corpus-based word lists. This paper documents the development of the initial version of the evaluation tool, as well as its first iteration, drawing upon the insights of both word list experts and practitioners in ELT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799124000157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the proliferation of large corpora and the availability of sophisticated corpus-analysis tools, the number of corpus-based word lists targeting different types of vocabulary has rapidly increased during the last 20 years. This wide variety of lists has caused problems for practitioners, for whom it is not always easy to decide which list is most useful for their purpose and context. Given the paucity of systematic guidance on how to evaluate word lists, this study aimed to construct an evaluation tool that is based on Nation's (2016) framework of critiquing word lists, but is reformulated for a different purpose and for different target users, in order to increase the applicability of information derived from corpus analysis (the word lists). Constructed based on a thorough literature review, and informed by practitioners’ views and uses of word lists, along with consultations with ELT practitioners and word list experts, the tool targets ELT practitioners such as teachers, curriculum and assessment coordinators, and materials developers involved in directing vocabulary acquisition. The tool caters to practitioners with different levels of expertise and knowledge—especially those who are unfamiliar with the intricacies of developing corpus-based word lists. This paper documents the development of the initial version of the evaluation tool, as well as its first iteration, drawing upon the insights of both word list experts and practitioners in ELT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发一种工具,用于评估英语教学中使用的基于语料库的词表
随着大型语料库的激增和复杂的语料库分析工具的出现,过去 20 年间,针对不同类型词汇的基于语料库的词表数量迅速增加。这些种类繁多的词表给从业人员带来了很多问题,他们不容易决定哪一个词表最适合他们的目的和语境。鉴于在如何评估词表方面缺乏系统性指导,本研究旨在构建一个评估工具,该工具以 Nation(2016 年)的词表评判框架为基础,但针对不同目的和不同目标用户重新制定,以提高从语料库分析(词表)中获得的信息的适用性。该工具的构建基于全面的文献综述,并参考了从业人员对单词表的看法和使用情况,还咨询了英语语言教学从业人员和单词表专家。该工具适用于具有不同专业水平和知识的从业人员,特别是那些不熟悉开发基于语料库的单词表的复杂性的人员。本文记录了该评估工具最初版本的开发过程,以及它的第一次迭代,并借鉴了词表专家和英语语言教学从业人员的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Corpus Linguistics
Applied Corpus Linguistics Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
期刊最新文献
Breach of pacta sunt servanda: A corpus-assisted analysis of newspaper discourse on the AUKUS agreement Identifying ChatGPT-generated texts in EFL students’ writing: Through comparative analysis of linguistic fingerprints English podcasts for schoolchildren and their vocabulary demands Capturing chronological variation in L2 speech through lexical measurements and regression analysis Investigating spoken classroom interactions in linguistically heterogeneous learning groups – An interdisciplinary approach to process video-based data in second language acquisition classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1