{"title":"Phonetic implementation and the interpretation of downstepping in Mainstream US English","authors":"Jill C. Thorson, Rachel Steindel Burdin","doi":"10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores downstepping in Mainstream US English using three experiments. Experiment 1 investigated if downstep was associated with accessible referents. Pairs of scenarios were constructed: one with <em>new</em> information and one with <em>accessible</em>. Two versions of the target utterances were recorded (one with high star, and one with downstepping) and presented in the <em>accessible</em> and <em>new</em> contexts. The high star contour was preferred overall, but less so in <em>accessible</em> contexts. A statistical model showed an effect of the phonetic implementation of the contour. Experiment 2 examined the phonetic realizations of the utterances in Experiment 1 using a categorical perception discrimination task. Participants showed linear perception within the downstep contours but a categorical difference between the high star and downstep contours. Experiment 3 explored the interpretations attached to downstepping. Listeners showed a categorical difference between high star and downstep contours for interpretation, hearing downstep as indicating something had happened before, and more resigned, disappointed, and less clear than high star contours. There was also variation within the downstep contours based on phonetic implementation of the contour. We show that downstep contours have distinct meanings from high star contours, and that these meanings may be mediated by their phonetic implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phonetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447024000469","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores downstepping in Mainstream US English using three experiments. Experiment 1 investigated if downstep was associated with accessible referents. Pairs of scenarios were constructed: one with new information and one with accessible. Two versions of the target utterances were recorded (one with high star, and one with downstepping) and presented in the accessible and new contexts. The high star contour was preferred overall, but less so in accessible contexts. A statistical model showed an effect of the phonetic implementation of the contour. Experiment 2 examined the phonetic realizations of the utterances in Experiment 1 using a categorical perception discrimination task. Participants showed linear perception within the downstep contours but a categorical difference between the high star and downstep contours. Experiment 3 explored the interpretations attached to downstepping. Listeners showed a categorical difference between high star and downstep contours for interpretation, hearing downstep as indicating something had happened before, and more resigned, disappointed, and less clear than high star contours. There was also variation within the downstep contours based on phonetic implementation of the contour. We show that downstep contours have distinct meanings from high star contours, and that these meanings may be mediated by their phonetic implementation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Phonetics publishes papers of an experimental or theoretical nature that deal with phonetic aspects of language and linguistic communication processes. Papers dealing with technological and/or pathological topics, or papers of an interdisciplinary nature are also suitable, provided that linguistic-phonetic principles underlie the work reported. Regular articles, review articles, and letters to the editor are published. Themed issues are also published, devoted entirely to a specific subject of interest within the field of phonetics.