Examining owners’ and contractors’ motivations to participate in collaborative risk management of mega infrastructure projects

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Project Management Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102614
Yuanli Li , Pengcheng Xiang , Paul W. Chan , Jinwen Zhang
{"title":"Examining owners’ and contractors’ motivations to participate in collaborative risk management of mega infrastructure projects","authors":"Yuanli Li ,&nbsp;Pengcheng Xiang ,&nbsp;Paul W. Chan ,&nbsp;Jinwen Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the importance of motivation in driving the formation of collaborative risk management, the existing literature lacks recognition of stakeholders’ motivations to participate in the collaborative risk management of mega infrastructure projects. By combining interview data with the theoretical framework based on previous literature, this study constructs a motivation framework for stakeholders to participate in collaborative risk management of mega infrastructure projects, comprising four groups of motivations formed by glue identity logic (organizational or individual level) and interest logic (intrinsic drive or extrinsic stimulus). Motivational differences between project owners and contractors are discussed based on the case study of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge, indicating that these differences are closely related to the identity of stakeholders and project progress. This study contributes a systematic perspective to recognize the motivations behind participation in collaborative risk management of mega infrastructure projects, aligns managerial intentions with actual motivations, and uncovers new insights into collaborative risk management. It enriches the collaborative risk management theory in mega infrastructure projects and provides guidance and inspiration for practitioners in decision-making and collaborative risk management in such projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786324000565","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the importance of motivation in driving the formation of collaborative risk management, the existing literature lacks recognition of stakeholders’ motivations to participate in the collaborative risk management of mega infrastructure projects. By combining interview data with the theoretical framework based on previous literature, this study constructs a motivation framework for stakeholders to participate in collaborative risk management of mega infrastructure projects, comprising four groups of motivations formed by glue identity logic (organizational or individual level) and interest logic (intrinsic drive or extrinsic stimulus). Motivational differences between project owners and contractors are discussed based on the case study of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge, indicating that these differences are closely related to the identity of stakeholders and project progress. This study contributes a systematic perspective to recognize the motivations behind participation in collaborative risk management of mega infrastructure projects, aligns managerial intentions with actual motivations, and uncovers new insights into collaborative risk management. It enriches the collaborative risk management theory in mega infrastructure projects and provides guidance and inspiration for practitioners in decision-making and collaborative risk management in such projects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究业主和承包商参与超大型基础设施项目合作风险管理的动机
尽管动机对协同风险管理的形成具有重要推动作用,但现有文献缺乏对利益相关者参与超大型基础设施项目协同风险管理动机的认识。通过将访谈数据与基于以往文献的理论框架相结合,本研究构建了利益相关者参与超大型基础设施项目协同风险管理的动机框架,包括四组动机,分别由身份逻辑(组织或个人层面)和利益逻辑(内在驱动或外在刺激)形成。基于港珠澳大桥的案例研究,讨论了项目业主和承包商之间的动机差异,指出这些差异与利益相关者的身份和项目进展密切相关。本研究以系统的视角认识了参与特大型基础设施项目协同风险管理的动机,将管理意图与实际动机相统一,为协同风险管理提供了新的视角。它丰富了超大型基础设施项目协作风险管理理论,为从业人员在此类项目中进行决策和协作风险管理提供了指导和启发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Project Management is recognized as a premier publication in the field of project management and organization studies. Our main objective is to contribute to the advancement of project management and project organizing through the publication of groundbreaking research. We are dedicated to presenting fresh insights and new knowledge in various domains, including project management, program management, portfolio management, project-oriented organizations, project networks, and project-oriented societies. We actively encourage submissions that explore project management and organizing from the perspectives of organizational behavior, strategy, supply chain management, technology, change management, innovation, and sustainability. By publishing high-quality research articles and reviews, we strive to revolutionize the academic landscape and propel the field of project management forward. We invite researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute to our journal and be a part of the progressive development in this exciting field.
期刊最新文献
Coevolution of relationship networks and resistance behaviors for building information modeling implementation in construction projects Examining owners’ and contractors’ motivations to participate in collaborative risk management of mega infrastructure projects Misfiring and still succeeding: Seeking success in megaprojects amidst changing regulatory environments Building legitimacy in flexible work projects: A study on institutional, organizational, and individual narratives Dynamics of routine creation and transfer in strategic programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1