Publication Barriers of Oral Abstracts Presented at the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons: 2015-2019

Calvin J. Rushing DPM, FACFAS , Kristen L. Paege
{"title":"Publication Barriers of Oral Abstracts Presented at the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons: 2015-2019","authors":"Calvin J. Rushing DPM, FACFAS ,&nbsp;Kristen L. Paege","doi":"10.1016/j.fastrc.2024.100405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The journal publication rate for oral abstracts presented at the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS) is currently the highest reported for any national foot and ankle society, to date (80.7%). Conversion rates for abstracts presented at national society meetings has long served as an indirect proxy for the quality of the content presented. However, it is unclear why some abstracts ultimately fail to achieve publication. The purpose of the present study was to assess the publication barriers of oral abstracts from ACFAS: 2015–2019. Unpublished oral abstracts were procured from a database. A questionnaire was distributed to presenting authors to determine the current status of the abstract, as well as the reasons for the failure to achieve journal publication. Of the 22 oral abstracts that failed to achieve publication, 10 questionnaires were completed. At the time of the survey, none of the abstracts had been submitted for publication. An insufficient amount of time (30%), responsibility tasked to a co-author (30%), low perceived likelihood of acceptance (30%), and low perceived priority (10%), were citied by authors. The present study broadens our understanding regarding the barriers to the conversion of oral abstracts from ACFAS. Projects led by trainees accounted for 2/3′s of the unpublished abstracts; in some cases, the same author accounted for more than 1 unpublished abstract over subsequent years. The onus is on directors to ensure their trainees receive adequate research mentorship and disseminate clinically meaningful findings presented at ACFAS to a broader audience by journal publication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73047,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000454/pdfft?md5=f16ed50a8ea24ae0a8a520662a58f4a8&pid=1-s2.0-S2667396724000454-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The journal publication rate for oral abstracts presented at the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS) is currently the highest reported for any national foot and ankle society, to date (80.7%). Conversion rates for abstracts presented at national society meetings has long served as an indirect proxy for the quality of the content presented. However, it is unclear why some abstracts ultimately fail to achieve publication. The purpose of the present study was to assess the publication barriers of oral abstracts from ACFAS: 2015–2019. Unpublished oral abstracts were procured from a database. A questionnaire was distributed to presenting authors to determine the current status of the abstract, as well as the reasons for the failure to achieve journal publication. Of the 22 oral abstracts that failed to achieve publication, 10 questionnaires were completed. At the time of the survey, none of the abstracts had been submitted for publication. An insufficient amount of time (30%), responsibility tasked to a co-author (30%), low perceived likelihood of acceptance (30%), and low perceived priority (10%), were citied by authors. The present study broadens our understanding regarding the barriers to the conversion of oral abstracts from ACFAS. Projects led by trainees accounted for 2/3′s of the unpublished abstracts; in some cases, the same author accounted for more than 1 unpublished abstract over subsequent years. The onus is on directors to ensure their trainees receive adequate research mentorship and disseminate clinically meaningful findings presented at ACFAS to a broader audience by journal publication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国足踝外科医生学会口头摘要的发表障碍:2015-2019 年
在美国足踝外科医生学会 (ACFAS) 上提交的口头摘要的期刊发表率是迄今为止所有全国性足踝学会中最高的(80.7%)。长期以来,在全国性学会会议上提交的摘要的转化率一直是所提交内容质量的间接代表。然而,目前还不清楚为什么有些摘要最终未能发表。本研究的目的是评估《ACFAS:2015-2019》中口头摘要的发表障碍。研究人员从数据库中获取了未发表的口头摘要。研究人员向摘要作者发放了调查问卷,以了解摘要的现状以及未能在期刊上发表的原因。在 22 份未能发表的口头摘要中,有 10 份完成了问卷调查。截至调查时,这些摘要均未投稿发表。作者们提到的原因包括:时间不够(30%)、共同作者的责任(30%)、接受的可能性较低(30%)以及优先级较低(10%)。本研究拓宽了我们对从 ACFAS 转化口头摘要的障碍的认识。由受训人员领导的项目占未发表摘要的三分之二;在某些情况下,同一作者在随后几年中发表了不止一篇未发表摘要。主任们有责任确保他们的受训人员得到充分的研究指导,并通过在期刊上发表论文的方式向更广泛的受众传播在ACFAS上发表的有临床意义的研究成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)
Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.) Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Podiatry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
75 days
期刊最新文献
Interpositional arthroplasty of the fourth and fifth tarsometatarsal joint with an autologous gastrocnemius aponeurosis graft: A surgical technique guide and case series Achilles hero or heel? A systematic review of popliteal nerve block for achilles repair Adenocarcinoma of the lung with metastasis to the foot: A case report MRI findings one year post-radio frequency ablation for chronic Achilles tendonosis: A case report Anatomic lateral ankle reconstruction with tendon allograft after failed brostrom. A case series and surgical technique guide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1