Resolution of Respect: Samuel J. McNaughton, 1939–2024

Douglas A. Frank, Martín Oesterheld
{"title":"Resolution of Respect: Samuel J. McNaughton, 1939–2024","authors":"Douglas A. Frank,&nbsp;Martín Oesterheld","doi":"10.1002/bes2.2136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Samuel Joseph McNaughton passed away peacefully at his home in Syracuse, NY on January 18, 2024. He is survived by Margaret McNaughton, his wife of 64 years, his two children, Sean (daughter-in-law Catherine) and Erin, and six grandchildren, Martine, Joshua, Shelby, Eli, Grace, and Esther.</p><p>Sam was born in Takoma Park, Md, but, in his own words, “fished, trapped, and hunted his way through much of his childhood in northwest Missouri.” After falling in love in high school, Sam and Margaret together attended Northwest Missouri State University (NWMSU), where Sam planned to study agriculture to continue the family business of farming. But while at NWMSU, he enrolled in a plant ecology course taught by Dr. Irene Mueller (a J. E. Weaver student) who helped Sam understand the patterns that had piqued his interest during his romps through nature. As part of the course, students read and critically discussed primary literature, which may have been Sam's initiation to curiosity-driven scientific investigation. This one course was ground-shifting for Sam, causing a pivot from agriculture to an interest in studying ecology, and probably instilled in him a deep appreciation for the importance of teaching, which he would carry throughout his academic career.</p><p>After graduating, Sam decided to work with Calvin McMillan at the University of Texas, Austin, which had one of the only climate-controlled plant growth facilities available at the time. He earned his Ph.D. in 1964 at the precocious age of 25, after which he spent 1 year as an Assistant Professor at Portland State University and 1 year as a postdoc at Stanford University, before starting his 38-year-long academic post at Syracuse University (SU) in 1966.</p><p>Sam's early scholarly work spanning his Ph.D. through the mid-1970s at SU focused on plant ecotypic variation, for which he used <i>Typha</i> as a study organism. His investigations examined the variation in production, phenotypic traits, and photosynthetic and respiratory biochemistry among populations of <i>Typha</i> throughout the midwestern and western United States. Because <i>Typha</i> overwhelmingly dominates communities, Sam's interpretations of his results spanned ecophysiological adaptation to whole community organization, a theme that would characterize his future influential studies of grassland ecosystems. His first four papers on <i>Typha</i> were published in 1965 and 1966 in <i>Science</i> (McNaughton <span>1965</span>), <i>Nature</i> (McNaughton <span>1966<i>a</i></span>, <span><i>b</i></span>), and <i>Ecological Monographs</i> (McNaughton <span>1966<i>c</i></span>) demonstrating two features of Sam's science. First, his remarkable productivity, which Larry Wolf, a longtime friend and colleague at SU, explained by Sam's ability to very quickly produce a draft of a manuscript that would require very little further work before submission. One of us (MO) was eye-witness to this while a graduate student in the McNaughton lab when Sam came into his office one weekend, which was not his habit, and wrote, with his keyboard clattering like a storm on a tin roof, an entire NSF proposal, beginning to end with references, in just 2 days. The proposal was funded. The second feature that those papers demonstrated was Sam's interest in tackling the pressing ecological problems of the time in novel and creative ways that merited publication in the very top ecological and scientific journals. We wish to underscore that each of those four papers was single-authored by a scientist in his mid-20s.</p><p>As Sam's <i>Typha</i> work continued to become more biochemical, he began to lament how much his science had become laboratory oriented. Then, in 1975, Larry Wolf, who was studying sunbirds in East Africa, invited Sam and Margaret to visit him in the Serengeti (Photo 1). Years later Margaret would sardonically admit that at the time she thought it prudent to agree to the trip so that Sam would “get it out of his system.” Fortunately for the McNaughton family, who still treasure the numerous research expeditions on which they accompanied Sam, and for grassland ecology, Sam's interest in the Serengeti was not satiated by that one visit. During the trip, Larry Wolf remembers Sam's intense interest in the relationship between movements of herds of grazers and grasslands. Upon returning to SU, Sam sequestered himself in the library for a couple of weeks while he wrote his first Serengeti proposal to NSF.</p><p>Sam's work on grassland ecology focused on the Serengeti ecosystem but also impacted broader ecological issues and theories (Photo 2). His studies revealed the multifaceted interactions between plant communities and grazing herbivores, along with the moderating effects of environmental variables such as fire, rainfall, and soil. His work drew strong conclusions on the core topics of ecology, such as ecosystem structure, function, diversity, stability, energy flow, and nutrient cycling. Sam's Serengeti research integrated extensive field observations with greenhouse and growth chamber experiments at SU, which allowed him to address questions on ecosystems, plant communities, populations, species, ecotype adaptation, and plant ecophysiological mechanisms. Similar to his <i>Typha</i> studies, this new line of research produced a remarkable series of papers in leading journals (<i>Nature</i>, <i>Science</i>, <i>Ecological Monographs</i>, <i>American Naturalist</i>), many of which were single-authored (e.g., McNaughton <span>1976</span>, <span>1977</span>, <span>1979</span>, <span>1983<i>a</i></span>, <span><i>b</i></span>, <span>1984</span>, <span>1985</span>, <span>1988</span>, <span>1990</span>).</p><p>In a series of observational and experimental studies, Sam showed how grazing herbivores selected for plants and sites with higher nutritional content and influenced nutrient cycling through their feeding activities. During the wet season in the Serengeti, grazers increased their diet quality by following a “green wave” of highly nutritious forage. Animals often created short and dense “grazing lawns” that maintained species composition and improved foraging efficiency by increasing the biomass and nutrients that they obtained per bite. He found that mutualistic plant–herbivore interactions would often increase plant productivity by compensatory growth, a controversial principal at first. He concluded that grazing, together with climate, fire, and soil heterogeneity, shaped the spatial heterogeneity of grasslands and savannas (Photo 3).</p><p>Sam performed a wide range of genetic and ecophysiological studies that shed light on how different plant species within a community have varied tolerances and adaptations to grazing. Prostrate growth form, fast regrowth, defensive compounds, unpalatable tissues, silica absorption, nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, and allocation all were shown by Sam's experiments to vary widely based on the coevolution between herbivores and the plants they eat. These adaptations not only influenced species survival but also the overall composition and functional diversity of plant communities. His studies on grassland ecology and plant ecophysiology allowed him to actively engage in the debate on the relationship between diversity and stability of ecosystems (McNaughton <span>1977</span>).</p><p>Sam's findings offered invaluable insights into the management and conservation of grassland ecosystems, and he frequently made them explicit in diverse contexts. Recognizing the importance of rainfall, fire, and soil properties in mediating the effects of herbivory highlighted the need for management practices to consider local environmental conditions and ecosystem dynamics. Additionally, understanding the adaptive strategies of plant communities to grazing pressures informed how conservation strategies can preserve biodiversity and ecosystem function. Over his career, Sam published about 125 papers, six of which have been cited over 1,000 times. In recognition of his major contributions to understanding terrestrial ecology, Sam was awarded the ESA Eminent Ecologist Award in 2004 (Photo 4).</p><p>Throughout the many years that Sam worked in the Serengeti, his wife, Margaret, often accompanied him in the field. Margaret also took charge of the laboratory, directing the analyses of the many thousands of plant and soil samples shipped to SU and coordinating the lab work of students and postdocs. In that way, Sam's research enterprise was a team effort between husband and wife.</p><p>Despite his groundbreaking research, Sam always considered that his most important contribution would be through his teaching, perhaps as a consequence of the enormous impact that Dr. Mueller's ecology class had on him while an undergraduate at NWMSU. After arriving at SU within a few years of one another, Sam and Larry Wolf began meeting regularly to discuss their research interests. They soon realized the large knowledge gap between plant and animal ecology, with the former focusing on physiology and community dynamics and the latter on population processes. As a consequence of those discussions, they decided to offer a course that integrated the two disciplines by pairing, as much as possible, plant- and animal-oriented lectures along common themes, instead of splitting the topics up into two independent units, which was common at the time. This collaboration led to them publishing a textbook, <i>General Ecology</i>, in 1973 (McNaughton and Wolf <span>1973</span>) that was based on their class lectures. Sam and Larry subsequently developed a field ecology course that integrated animal and plant topics in a similar fashion as their lecture course. They taught those two courses together for many years. When Sam was awarded a William R. Kenan Jr. Professorship in 1992, he could have stopped teaching, which would have been the impulse for many academics. Instead, Sam used the opportunity to develop a new Conservation Biology course, which he taught until he retired in 2004.</p><p>Roughly 25 graduate students and postdocs were advised by Sam. He was an enormously humble mentor, as eager to learn from his mentees as his mentees were from him. He was also a patient advisor, allowing his students the necessary time to labor with difficult problems. One of us (DF), while struggling to complete his dissertation, remembers Sam handing him a <i>Bioscience</i> commentary about how advisors should provide students sufficient time to resolve novel scientific problems. It was a message of understanding and support that was greatly appreciated. Working with his graduate students, post docs, and many other colleagues outside of his lab allowed Sam to collaborate on projects in grasslands in Africa, North and South America, and Asia, and on global patterns of herbivory.</p><p>There are standard parameters used to measure the scientific impact of a researcher such as number of publications, citations, awards, etc., and Sam certainly excelled in all of those. Another measure is the impact that a scientist has on how we think and talk about a topic. By this latter measure, Sam's impact has been enormous. At scientific meetings throughout the world, during the formal talks and the informal discourse in hallways between talks, among ecologists, agronomists, and range managers, in college courses and thesis defenses, during debates at research stations, and while “kicking the dirt” in grasslands and pastures in Pampas, Puna, Mongolia, the Great Plains, and tropical and subtropical savannas, the talk is about compensatory growth, grazing lawns, green waves, grazing ecotypes, and the many other topics championed by Sam. Now THAT is true impact!</p>","PeriodicalId":93418,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America","volume":"105 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bes2.2136","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bes2.2136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Samuel Joseph McNaughton passed away peacefully at his home in Syracuse, NY on January 18, 2024. He is survived by Margaret McNaughton, his wife of 64 years, his two children, Sean (daughter-in-law Catherine) and Erin, and six grandchildren, Martine, Joshua, Shelby, Eli, Grace, and Esther.

Sam was born in Takoma Park, Md, but, in his own words, “fished, trapped, and hunted his way through much of his childhood in northwest Missouri.” After falling in love in high school, Sam and Margaret together attended Northwest Missouri State University (NWMSU), where Sam planned to study agriculture to continue the family business of farming. But while at NWMSU, he enrolled in a plant ecology course taught by Dr. Irene Mueller (a J. E. Weaver student) who helped Sam understand the patterns that had piqued his interest during his romps through nature. As part of the course, students read and critically discussed primary literature, which may have been Sam's initiation to curiosity-driven scientific investigation. This one course was ground-shifting for Sam, causing a pivot from agriculture to an interest in studying ecology, and probably instilled in him a deep appreciation for the importance of teaching, which he would carry throughout his academic career.

After graduating, Sam decided to work with Calvin McMillan at the University of Texas, Austin, which had one of the only climate-controlled plant growth facilities available at the time. He earned his Ph.D. in 1964 at the precocious age of 25, after which he spent 1 year as an Assistant Professor at Portland State University and 1 year as a postdoc at Stanford University, before starting his 38-year-long academic post at Syracuse University (SU) in 1966.

Sam's early scholarly work spanning his Ph.D. through the mid-1970s at SU focused on plant ecotypic variation, for which he used Typha as a study organism. His investigations examined the variation in production, phenotypic traits, and photosynthetic and respiratory biochemistry among populations of Typha throughout the midwestern and western United States. Because Typha overwhelmingly dominates communities, Sam's interpretations of his results spanned ecophysiological adaptation to whole community organization, a theme that would characterize his future influential studies of grassland ecosystems. His first four papers on Typha were published in 1965 and 1966 in Science (McNaughton 1965), Nature (McNaughton 1966a, b), and Ecological Monographs (McNaughton 1966c) demonstrating two features of Sam's science. First, his remarkable productivity, which Larry Wolf, a longtime friend and colleague at SU, explained by Sam's ability to very quickly produce a draft of a manuscript that would require very little further work before submission. One of us (MO) was eye-witness to this while a graduate student in the McNaughton lab when Sam came into his office one weekend, which was not his habit, and wrote, with his keyboard clattering like a storm on a tin roof, an entire NSF proposal, beginning to end with references, in just 2 days. The proposal was funded. The second feature that those papers demonstrated was Sam's interest in tackling the pressing ecological problems of the time in novel and creative ways that merited publication in the very top ecological and scientific journals. We wish to underscore that each of those four papers was single-authored by a scientist in his mid-20s.

As Sam's Typha work continued to become more biochemical, he began to lament how much his science had become laboratory oriented. Then, in 1975, Larry Wolf, who was studying sunbirds in East Africa, invited Sam and Margaret to visit him in the Serengeti (Photo 1). Years later Margaret would sardonically admit that at the time she thought it prudent to agree to the trip so that Sam would “get it out of his system.” Fortunately for the McNaughton family, who still treasure the numerous research expeditions on which they accompanied Sam, and for grassland ecology, Sam's interest in the Serengeti was not satiated by that one visit. During the trip, Larry Wolf remembers Sam's intense interest in the relationship between movements of herds of grazers and grasslands. Upon returning to SU, Sam sequestered himself in the library for a couple of weeks while he wrote his first Serengeti proposal to NSF.

Sam's work on grassland ecology focused on the Serengeti ecosystem but also impacted broader ecological issues and theories (Photo 2). His studies revealed the multifaceted interactions between plant communities and grazing herbivores, along with the moderating effects of environmental variables such as fire, rainfall, and soil. His work drew strong conclusions on the core topics of ecology, such as ecosystem structure, function, diversity, stability, energy flow, and nutrient cycling. Sam's Serengeti research integrated extensive field observations with greenhouse and growth chamber experiments at SU, which allowed him to address questions on ecosystems, plant communities, populations, species, ecotype adaptation, and plant ecophysiological mechanisms. Similar to his Typha studies, this new line of research produced a remarkable series of papers in leading journals (Nature, Science, Ecological Monographs, American Naturalist), many of which were single-authored (e.g., McNaughton 1976, 1977, 1979, 1983a, b, 1984, 1985, 1988, 1990).

In a series of observational and experimental studies, Sam showed how grazing herbivores selected for plants and sites with higher nutritional content and influenced nutrient cycling through their feeding activities. During the wet season in the Serengeti, grazers increased their diet quality by following a “green wave” of highly nutritious forage. Animals often created short and dense “grazing lawns” that maintained species composition and improved foraging efficiency by increasing the biomass and nutrients that they obtained per bite. He found that mutualistic plant–herbivore interactions would often increase plant productivity by compensatory growth, a controversial principal at first. He concluded that grazing, together with climate, fire, and soil heterogeneity, shaped the spatial heterogeneity of grasslands and savannas (Photo 3).

Sam performed a wide range of genetic and ecophysiological studies that shed light on how different plant species within a community have varied tolerances and adaptations to grazing. Prostrate growth form, fast regrowth, defensive compounds, unpalatable tissues, silica absorption, nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, and allocation all were shown by Sam's experiments to vary widely based on the coevolution between herbivores and the plants they eat. These adaptations not only influenced species survival but also the overall composition and functional diversity of plant communities. His studies on grassland ecology and plant ecophysiology allowed him to actively engage in the debate on the relationship between diversity and stability of ecosystems (McNaughton 1977).

Sam's findings offered invaluable insights into the management and conservation of grassland ecosystems, and he frequently made them explicit in diverse contexts. Recognizing the importance of rainfall, fire, and soil properties in mediating the effects of herbivory highlighted the need for management practices to consider local environmental conditions and ecosystem dynamics. Additionally, understanding the adaptive strategies of plant communities to grazing pressures informed how conservation strategies can preserve biodiversity and ecosystem function. Over his career, Sam published about 125 papers, six of which have been cited over 1,000 times. In recognition of his major contributions to understanding terrestrial ecology, Sam was awarded the ESA Eminent Ecologist Award in 2004 (Photo 4).

Throughout the many years that Sam worked in the Serengeti, his wife, Margaret, often accompanied him in the field. Margaret also took charge of the laboratory, directing the analyses of the many thousands of plant and soil samples shipped to SU and coordinating the lab work of students and postdocs. In that way, Sam's research enterprise was a team effort between husband and wife.

Despite his groundbreaking research, Sam always considered that his most important contribution would be through his teaching, perhaps as a consequence of the enormous impact that Dr. Mueller's ecology class had on him while an undergraduate at NWMSU. After arriving at SU within a few years of one another, Sam and Larry Wolf began meeting regularly to discuss their research interests. They soon realized the large knowledge gap between plant and animal ecology, with the former focusing on physiology and community dynamics and the latter on population processes. As a consequence of those discussions, they decided to offer a course that integrated the two disciplines by pairing, as much as possible, plant- and animal-oriented lectures along common themes, instead of splitting the topics up into two independent units, which was common at the time. This collaboration led to them publishing a textbook, General Ecology, in 1973 (McNaughton and Wolf 1973) that was based on their class lectures. Sam and Larry subsequently developed a field ecology course that integrated animal and plant topics in a similar fashion as their lecture course. They taught those two courses together for many years. When Sam was awarded a William R. Kenan Jr. Professorship in 1992, he could have stopped teaching, which would have been the impulse for many academics. Instead, Sam used the opportunity to develop a new Conservation Biology course, which he taught until he retired in 2004.

Roughly 25 graduate students and postdocs were advised by Sam. He was an enormously humble mentor, as eager to learn from his mentees as his mentees were from him. He was also a patient advisor, allowing his students the necessary time to labor with difficult problems. One of us (DF), while struggling to complete his dissertation, remembers Sam handing him a Bioscience commentary about how advisors should provide students sufficient time to resolve novel scientific problems. It was a message of understanding and support that was greatly appreciated. Working with his graduate students, post docs, and many other colleagues outside of his lab allowed Sam to collaborate on projects in grasslands in Africa, North and South America, and Asia, and on global patterns of herbivory.

There are standard parameters used to measure the scientific impact of a researcher such as number of publications, citations, awards, etc., and Sam certainly excelled in all of those. Another measure is the impact that a scientist has on how we think and talk about a topic. By this latter measure, Sam's impact has been enormous. At scientific meetings throughout the world, during the formal talks and the informal discourse in hallways between talks, among ecologists, agronomists, and range managers, in college courses and thesis defenses, during debates at research stations, and while “kicking the dirt” in grasslands and pastures in Pampas, Puna, Mongolia, the Great Plains, and tropical and subtropical savannas, the talk is about compensatory growth, grazing lawns, green waves, grazing ecotypes, and the many other topics championed by Sam. Now THAT is true impact!

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
致敬决议塞缪尔-麦克诺顿(Samuel J. McNaughton),1939-2024 年
萨姆的塞伦盖蒂研究将大量的实地观察与苏大的温室和生长室实验相结合,使他能够解决生态系统、植物群落、种群、物种、生态型适应以及植物生态生理机制等方面的问题。在一系列观察和实验研究中,萨姆展示了食草动物如何选择营养成分较高的植物和地点,并通过它们的取食活动影响营养循环。在塞伦盖蒂的雨季,食草动物通过追随高营养饲料的 "绿色浪潮 "来提高食物质量。动物经常创造出短而密集的 "草坪",以保持物种组成,并通过增加每一口获得的生物量和养分来提高觅食效率。他发现,植物与食草动物之间的相互影响往往会通过补偿性生长提高植物的生产力,这在一开始是有争议的。他的结论是,放牧与气候、火灾和土壤异质性共同塑造了草原和热带稀树草原的空间异质性(照片 3)。萨姆进行了广泛的遗传学和生态生理学研究,揭示了群落中不同植物物种对放牧的不同耐受性和适应性。山姆的实验表明,匍匐生长形式、快速再生、防御性化合物、难食组织、硅吸收、氮和磷吸收以及分配等,都因食草动物和它们所吃的植物之间的共同进化而大不相同。这些适应性不仅影响物种的生存,还影响植物群落的整体组成和功能多样性。萨姆对草原生态学和植物生态生理学的研究使他能够积极参与关于生态系统多样性和稳定性之间关系的讨论(麦克诺顿,1977 年)。萨姆的研究成果为草原生态系统的管理和保护提供了宝贵的见解,他经常在不同场合明确阐述这些见解。认识到降雨、火灾和土壤特性对草食动物影响的重要性,突出了管理实践需要考虑当地环境条件和生态系统动态。此外,通过了解植物群落对放牧压力的适应策略,他还了解到保护策略如何才能保护生物多样性和生态系统功能。在他的职业生涯中,萨姆发表了约 125 篇论文,其中六篇论文被引用超过 1000 次。为了表彰萨姆在了解陆地生态学方面做出的重大贡献,2004 年,萨姆被授予欧空局杰出生态学家奖(照片 4)。在萨姆在塞伦盖蒂工作的许多年里,他的妻子玛格丽特经常陪伴他在野外工作。玛格丽特还负责实验室的工作,指导分析运往苏格兰大学的数千份植物和土壤样本,并协调学生和博士后的实验室工作。尽管山姆的研究具有开创性,但他始终认为自己最重要的贡献是在教学方面,这也许是穆勒博士的生态学课对他在西北农林科技大学读本科时产生巨大影响的结果。萨姆和拉里-沃尔夫相隔几年就来到了苏大,他们开始定期会面,讨论各自的研究兴趣。他们很快就意识到植物生态学和动物生态学之间存在巨大的知识鸿沟,前者侧重于生理学和群落动力学,后者则侧重于种群过程。讨论的结果是,他们决定开设一门整合这两个学科的课程,尽可能将面向植物和动物的讲座按照共同的主题进行配对,而不是像当时常见的那样将主题分成两个独立的单元。通过这次合作,他们于 1973 年出版了一本教科书《普通生态学》(McNaughton 和 Wolf,1973 年),这本教科书就是以他们的课堂讲义为基础编写的。随后,萨姆和拉里又开发了一门野外生态学课程,以类似于他们讲授课程的方式整合了动物和植物主题。他们一起教授这两门课程多年。1992 年,萨姆被授予小威廉-凯南(William R. Kenan Jr.1992 年,当山姆被授予小威廉-R-凯南教授职位时,他本可以停止教学,这也是许多学者的冲动。但山姆却利用这个机会开发了一门新的保护生物学课程,并一直教授到 2004 年退休。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover From Prototype to Reality: Moving Beyond the Technology Hype in Ecological Research Urban Scavengers: Human Activities Underpin Sandy Beach Scavenging Dynamics Review of COS 173-Education Research and Assessment: Pathways for Engaging Students in Socioecological Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1