Spatio-Temporal Variations of Habitat Quality Under 8 SSP-RCP Scenarios in China

IF 3.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences Pub Date : 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1029/2024JG008030
Yuke Feng, Shiyan Zhai, Genxin Song, Hongquan Song, Guanpeng Dong, Xintong Jiang, Changchang Dong, H. B. T. P. Jayathilaka
{"title":"Spatio-Temporal Variations of Habitat Quality Under 8 SSP-RCP Scenarios in China","authors":"Yuke Feng,&nbsp;Shiyan Zhai,&nbsp;Genxin Song,&nbsp;Hongquan Song,&nbsp;Guanpeng Dong,&nbsp;Xintong Jiang,&nbsp;Changchang Dong,&nbsp;H. B. T. P. Jayathilaka","doi":"10.1029/2024JG008030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Habitat quality is a key expression of ecosystem ability and the basis for effective species conservation and regional ecological environment improvement. However, most studies have focused on assessing habitat quality over historical periods, ignoring the influence of coupled future development paths and climate change. The present study addresses this issue by developing a spatial-temporal variation analysis framework for assessing habitat quality in China, which integrates the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) model with eight Earth system coupled scenarios (SSP-RCP). The results showed that from 2020 to 2100, and under five scenarios (SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, SSP4-6.0, SSP5-3.4, and SSP5-8.5), habitat quality was generally stable and high, while under three scenarios (SSP1-1.9, SSP1-2.6, and SSP4-3.4), it decreased. The SSP2-4.5 scenario was significantly better than the SSP4-3.4 scenario. In all scenarios, the influences of different development patterns on China's ecologically fragile areas were obvious and serious. In 2030 and 2060, the spatial distribution patterns of habitat degradation and habitat quality had similar characteristics. High habitat degradation values were mostly distributed east of the Heihe-Tengchong Line, while low values were mainly distributed in the arid zone. The mean habitat degradation ranged between 0.0226 and 0.0302, and the degradation degree was relatively light. The habitat quality index mean was 0.5120–0.5376, indicating that the overall habitat quality was at the medium level. This study provides a potential ecological protection baseline for China based on habitat protection and provides an important reference for China's sustainable development.</p>","PeriodicalId":16003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JG008030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Habitat quality is a key expression of ecosystem ability and the basis for effective species conservation and regional ecological environment improvement. However, most studies have focused on assessing habitat quality over historical periods, ignoring the influence of coupled future development paths and climate change. The present study addresses this issue by developing a spatial-temporal variation analysis framework for assessing habitat quality in China, which integrates the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) model with eight Earth system coupled scenarios (SSP-RCP). The results showed that from 2020 to 2100, and under five scenarios (SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, SSP4-6.0, SSP5-3.4, and SSP5-8.5), habitat quality was generally stable and high, while under three scenarios (SSP1-1.9, SSP1-2.6, and SSP4-3.4), it decreased. The SSP2-4.5 scenario was significantly better than the SSP4-3.4 scenario. In all scenarios, the influences of different development patterns on China's ecologically fragile areas were obvious and serious. In 2030 and 2060, the spatial distribution patterns of habitat degradation and habitat quality had similar characteristics. High habitat degradation values were mostly distributed east of the Heihe-Tengchong Line, while low values were mainly distributed in the arid zone. The mean habitat degradation ranged between 0.0226 and 0.0302, and the degradation degree was relatively light. The habitat quality index mean was 0.5120–0.5376, indicating that the overall habitat quality was at the medium level. This study provides a potential ecological protection baseline for China based on habitat protection and provides an important reference for China's sustainable development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
8 种 SSP-RCP 情景下中国生境质量的时空变化
生境质量是生态系统能力的重要体现,也是有效保护物种和改善区域生态环境的基础。然而,大多数研究都侧重于评估历史时期的栖息地质量,忽视了未来发展路径和气候变化的耦合影响。本研究针对这一问题,建立了中国栖息地质量评估的时空变化分析框架,将生态系统服务与权衡综合评价(InVEST)模型与八种地球系统耦合情景(SSP-RCP)相结合。结果表明,从 2020 年到 2100 年,在五种情景(SSP2-4.5、SSP3-7.0、SSP4-6.0、SSP5-3.4 和 SSP5-8.5)下,栖息地质量总体稳定且较高,而在三种情景(SSP1-1.9、SSP1-2.6 和 SSP4-3.4)下,栖息地质量有所下降。SSP2-4.5 方案明显优于 SSP4-3.4 方案。在所有情景中,不同发展模式对中国生态脆弱地区的影响都是明显而严重的。2030 年和 2060 年,生境退化和生境质量的空间分布格局具有相似的特征。高生境退化值主要分布在黑河-腾冲线以东,低生境退化值主要分布在干旱区。栖息地退化平均值在 0.0226 至 0.0302 之间,退化程度较轻。生境质量指数平均值为 0.5120-0.5376,表明生境质量总体处于中等水平。本研究提供了基于栖息地保护的中国潜在生态保护基线,为中国的可持续发展提供了重要参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: JGR-Biogeosciences focuses on biogeosciences of the Earth system in the past, present, and future and the extension of this research to planetary studies. The emerging field of biogeosciences spans the intellectual interface between biology and the geosciences and attempts to understand the functions of the Earth system across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Studies in biogeosciences may use multiple lines of evidence drawn from diverse fields to gain a holistic understanding of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems and extreme environments. Specific topics within the scope of the section include process-based theoretical, experimental, and field studies of biogeochemistry, biogeophysics, atmosphere-, land-, and ocean-ecosystem interactions, biomineralization, life in extreme environments, astrobiology, microbial processes, geomicrobiology, and evolutionary geobiology
期刊最新文献
Limited Organic Carbon Burial by the Rusty Carbon Sink in Swedish Fjord Sediments Assessment of Landscape-Scale Fluxes of Carbon Dioxide and Methane in Subtropical Coastal Wetlands of South Florida The Role of Nutrient and Energy Limitation on Microbial Decomposition of Deep Podzolized Carbon: A Priming Experiment Divergent Responses of Organic Carbon to Sedimentary Environment Transformation in a River-Dominated Marginal Sea A Global Evaluation of Radar-Derived Digital Elevation Models: SRTM, NASADEM, and GLO-30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1