A Penguin is Not a Giraffe: Categorizing Preschool Children According to Temperament

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Early Childhood Education Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1007/s10643-024-01696-8
Jana Maine, Timothy J. Huelsman, Sandra Glover Gagnon, Rose Mary Webb, Pamela Kidder-Ashley
{"title":"A Penguin is Not a Giraffe: Categorizing Preschool Children According to Temperament","authors":"Jana Maine, Timothy J. Huelsman, Sandra Glover Gagnon, Rose Mary Webb, Pamela Kidder-Ashley","doi":"10.1007/s10643-024-01696-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Temperament is a widely researched trait that significantly influences children’s lives. Still, theorists differ in their perspectives on the construct. With their nine dimensions of temperament and three “categories” of children—<i>easy</i>, <i>difficult</i>, or <i>slow to warm up</i>—Thomas and colleagues (1968) laid the foundation for future temperament research. Subsequent researchers have identified temperament profiles that are similar to but not completely consistent with Thomas and colleagues’ model. Still, most conceptualizations exist primarily for researchers and may be challenging to translate for educators who work directly with children and their caregivers. Therefore, this study had two aims. First, we used cluster analysis to corroborate and extend research that categorized children into temperament groups. We identified four groups that converge and one group that diverges from previous findings. Our second, more important purpose was to strengthen the link between research and practice by conceptualizing our results in a way that is understandable to educators and caregivers. The challenging task of capturing the nature of each cluster in one or even a few words led us to adopt a zoomorphic approach in which we assigned nonhuman animal names to each group: koalas, penguins, dogs, bobcats, and giraffes. Our findings support previous groupings of children by temperament and provide a consumer-friendly model that facilitates communication between caregivers and educators.</p>","PeriodicalId":47818,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Education Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01696-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Temperament is a widely researched trait that significantly influences children’s lives. Still, theorists differ in their perspectives on the construct. With their nine dimensions of temperament and three “categories” of children—easy, difficult, or slow to warm up—Thomas and colleagues (1968) laid the foundation for future temperament research. Subsequent researchers have identified temperament profiles that are similar to but not completely consistent with Thomas and colleagues’ model. Still, most conceptualizations exist primarily for researchers and may be challenging to translate for educators who work directly with children and their caregivers. Therefore, this study had two aims. First, we used cluster analysis to corroborate and extend research that categorized children into temperament groups. We identified four groups that converge and one group that diverges from previous findings. Our second, more important purpose was to strengthen the link between research and practice by conceptualizing our results in a way that is understandable to educators and caregivers. The challenging task of capturing the nature of each cluster in one or even a few words led us to adopt a zoomorphic approach in which we assigned nonhuman animal names to each group: koalas, penguins, dogs, bobcats, and giraffes. Our findings support previous groupings of children by temperament and provide a consumer-friendly model that facilitates communication between caregivers and educators.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企鹅不是长颈鹿:根据气质对学龄前儿童进行分类
气质是一种被广泛研究的特质,对儿童的生活有着重大影响。然而,理论家们对这一概念的看法却不尽相同。托马斯及其同事(1968 年)提出了气质的九个维度和儿童的三个 "类别"--容易热身、难以热身或热身缓慢--为日后的气质研究奠定了基础。后来的研究人员发现了与托马斯及其同事的模型相似但不完全一致的气质特征。尽管如此,大多数概念主要是为研究人员而存在的,对于直接与儿童及其看护者打交道的教育工作者来说,将其转化为概念可能具有挑战性。因此,本研究有两个目的。首先,我们使用聚类分析来证实和扩展将儿童划分为气质类型的研究。我们发现有四个组与之前的研究结果一致,一个组与之前的研究结果不同。我们的第二个、也是更重要的目的是,通过将我们的结果概念化,使教育者和看护者能够理解,从而加强研究与实践之间的联系。用一个甚至几个词来概括每个分组的性质是一项极具挑战性的任务,因此我们采用了放大法,为每个分组指定了非人类动物的名称:考拉、企鹅、狗、山猫和长颈鹿。我们的研究结果支持了以前按气质对儿童进行的分组,并提供了一个方便消费者的模型,促进了照顾者和教育者之间的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Early Childhood Education Journal
Early Childhood Education Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Early Childhood Education Journal is a professional publication of original peer-reviewed articles that reflect exemplary practices in the field of contemporary early childhood education. Articles cover the social, physical, emotional, and intellectual development of children age birth through 8, analyzing issues, trends, and practices from an educational perspective. The journal publishes feature-length articles that skillfully blend 1) theory, research, and practice, 2) descriptions of outstanding early childhood programs worldwide, and 3) quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. Early Childhood Education Journal is of interest not only to classroom teachers, child care providers, college and university faculty, and administrators, but also to other professionals in psychology, health care, family relations, and social services dedicated to the care of young children. Areas of Emphasis: International studies; Educational programs in diverse settings; Early learning across multiple domains; Projects demonstrating inter-professional collaboration; Qualitative and quantitative research and case studies; Best practices in early childhood teacher education; Theory, research, and practice relating to professional development; Family, school, and community relationships; Investigations related to curriculum and instruction; Articles that link theory and best practices; Reviews of research with well-articulated connections to the field
期刊最新文献
Empowering Young Writers: A Multimodal Case Study of Emergent Writing in Urban Preschool Classrooms Modalities and Effectiveness of Interventions Aimed at Promoting Teacher–Child Interaction to Reduce Children’s Externalizing Behavior Problems in Childcare Centers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Social Purpose and Pedagogy in the Baby Room of UK Nurseries: Exploring the What, How and Why of Working with 0–2 Year Olds Preservice Teachers’ Visions and Understandings of Classroom Documentation and Displays of Children’s Work in Elementary Schools Constructing Closeness in Educational Collaboration in Extended Hours ECEC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1