Field longevity of methyl eugenol and cue-lure plugs and associated insecticidal strips: captures of Bactrocera dorsalis and Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii.

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Environmental Entomology Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1093/ee/nvae064
Todd E Shelly, Thomas J Fezza, Rodolfo Mesa Martin
{"title":"Field longevity of methyl eugenol and cue-lure plugs and associated insecticidal strips: captures of Bactrocera dorsalis and Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii.","authors":"Todd E Shelly, Thomas J Fezza, Rodolfo Mesa Martin","doi":"10.1093/ee/nvae064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Certain species of true fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) cause tremendous damage to commercially important fruits and vegetables, and many countries operate continuous trapping programs which rely on male-specific lures such as trimedlure (TML), methyl eugenol (ME), and cue-lure (CL). Traditionally, these attractants have been applied as liquids to cotton wicks inside traps, although this results in high evaporative loss of the lure. Slow-release, polymeric plugs have been widely adopted for TML, but such devices are not widely used for ME or CL. Recent data, however, suggest that ME and CL plugs may be attractive for as long as 12 wk in the field. The present study investigates whether ME and CL plugs weathered for 18 or 24 wk are effective in capturing males of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett), respectively. For B. dorsalis, 6 g ME plugs were as effective as the control treatment (fresh liquid on a wick) after 12 wk of weathering but not after 18 or 24 wk. For Z. cucurbitae, 3 g CL plugs were as effective as the control treatment (fresh CL plugs) after 12 and 18 wk of weathering but not after 24 wk. The residual content and release rate of the 2 lures were also measured over time, but, with the exception of the residual content of ME, we did not find a direct correlation between these parameters and numbers of flies captured.</p>","PeriodicalId":11751,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Entomology","volume":" ","pages":"782-788"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvae064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Certain species of true fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) cause tremendous damage to commercially important fruits and vegetables, and many countries operate continuous trapping programs which rely on male-specific lures such as trimedlure (TML), methyl eugenol (ME), and cue-lure (CL). Traditionally, these attractants have been applied as liquids to cotton wicks inside traps, although this results in high evaporative loss of the lure. Slow-release, polymeric plugs have been widely adopted for TML, but such devices are not widely used for ME or CL. Recent data, however, suggest that ME and CL plugs may be attractive for as long as 12 wk in the field. The present study investigates whether ME and CL plugs weathered for 18 or 24 wk are effective in capturing males of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett), respectively. For B. dorsalis, 6 g ME plugs were as effective as the control treatment (fresh liquid on a wick) after 12 wk of weathering but not after 18 or 24 wk. For Z. cucurbitae, 3 g CL plugs were as effective as the control treatment (fresh CL plugs) after 12 and 18 wk of weathering but not after 24 wk. The residual content and release rate of the 2 lures were also measured over time, but, with the exception of the residual content of ME, we did not find a direct correlation between these parameters and numbers of flies captured.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲基丁香酚和诱导露塞及相关杀虫条的野外寿命:在夏威夷捕获的 Bactrocera dorsalis 和 Zeugodacus cucurbitae(双翅目:Tephritidae)。
某些种类的真果蝇(双翅目:Tephritidae)会对具有重要商业价值的水果和蔬菜造成巨大损失,许多国家实施的连续诱捕计划都依赖于雄蝇特异性引诱剂,如 trimedlure (TML)、甲基丁香酚 (ME) 和 cue-lure (CL)。传统上,这些引诱剂都是以液体形式涂抹在诱捕器内的棉芯上,但这会导致引诱剂的大量蒸发损失。缓释聚合塞已被广泛用于 TML,但此类装置并未广泛用于 ME 或 CL。不过,最近的数据表明,ME 和 CL 塞在野外 12 周内都可能具有吸引力。本研究调查了风化 18 或 24 周的 ME 和 CL 插条是否能分别有效捕获 Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) 和 Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett) 的雄虫。对于 B. dorsalis,6 克 ME 插条在风化 12 周后与对照处理(灯芯上的新鲜液体)一样有效,但在风化 18 或 24 周后则无效。对于葫芦蝇(Z. cucurbitae),3 克 CL 插条在风化 12 和 18 周后与对照处理(新鲜 CL 插条)一样有效,但在风化 24 周后无效。我们还测量了两种诱饵的残留物含量和释放率,但除了 ME 的残留物含量外,我们没有发现这些参数与捕获的苍蝇数量有直接关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Entomology
Environmental Entomology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
97
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Entomology is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December. The journal publishes reports on the interaction of insects with the biological, chemical, and physical aspects of their environment. In addition to research papers, Environmental Entomology publishes Reviews, interpretive articles in a Forum section, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
A review of non-microbial biological control strategies against the Asian longhorned beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Addition of ammonium acetate to torula yeast borax and its effect on captures of three species of economically important fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Testing the efficacy of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) as a inundative biological control agent in Western Nebraska. Sex-ratio distortion in a weed biological control agent, Ceratapion basicorne (Coleoptera: Brentidae), associated with a species of Rickettsia. Catching invasives with curiosity: the importance of passive biosecurity surveillance systems for invasive forest pest detection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1