Yawei Cao, Xiaofeng Zhu, Jin Shang, Jinlong Zheng, Xiangyang Tian, Qiu Han, Jun Shen
{"title":"Correlation between lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 and poststroke mild cognitive impairment.","authors":"Yawei Cao, Xiaofeng Zhu, Jin Shang, Jinlong Zheng, Xiangyang Tian, Qiu Han, Jun Shen","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2024.2370410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the correlation between serum lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) and poststroke mild cognitive impairment (PSMCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients included in the study were divided into PSMCI (68 cases) and cognitively normal (CN) (218 cases) groups and followed up for six months. Demographic and clinical data were collected. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether Lp-PLA2 is an independent risk factor for PSMCI. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between Lp-PLA2 levels and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic threshold value of Lp-PLA2 for PSMCI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum Lp-PLA2 levels were significantly higher in the PSMCI group than in the CN group. The logistic regression analysis showed that Lp-PLA2 was an independent risk factor for PSMCI (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.03-1.07). Spearman's correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between the Lp-PLA2 levels and MoCA scores (R = -0.49). The area under the ROC curve for Lp-PLA2 was 0.849, and the threshold value for PSMCI occurrence was 236.8 ng/ml.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated serum Lp-PLA2 is an independent risk factor for PSMCI and may serve as a potential biomarker for PSMCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"541-547"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2024.2370410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between serum lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) and poststroke mild cognitive impairment (PSMCI).
Methods: The patients included in the study were divided into PSMCI (68 cases) and cognitively normal (CN) (218 cases) groups and followed up for six months. Demographic and clinical data were collected. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether Lp-PLA2 is an independent risk factor for PSMCI. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between Lp-PLA2 levels and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic threshold value of Lp-PLA2 for PSMCI.
Results: Serum Lp-PLA2 levels were significantly higher in the PSMCI group than in the CN group. The logistic regression analysis showed that Lp-PLA2 was an independent risk factor for PSMCI (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.03-1.07). Spearman's correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between the Lp-PLA2 levels and MoCA scores (R = -0.49). The area under the ROC curve for Lp-PLA2 was 0.849, and the threshold value for PSMCI occurrence was 236.8 ng/ml.
Conclusions: Elevated serum Lp-PLA2 is an independent risk factor for PSMCI and may serve as a potential biomarker for PSMCI.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting.
Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy.
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.