Efficacy of acupuncture in refractory irritable bowel syndrome patients: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Frontiers of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1007/s11684-024-1073-7
Jun Zhao, Hui Zheng, Xin Wang, Xuefei Wang, Yunzhou Shi, Chaorong Xie, Qingfeng Tao, Da Li, Jingwen Sun, Junjian Tian, Junxia Gao, Huimin Liu, Suhua Shi, Jinxia Ni, Rongdan Xue, Hui Hu, Min Chen, Shuguang Yu, Zhigang Li
{"title":"Efficacy of acupuncture in refractory irritable bowel syndrome patients: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jun Zhao, Hui Zheng, Xin Wang, Xuefei Wang, Yunzhou Shi, Chaorong Xie, Qingfeng Tao, Da Li, Jingwen Sun, Junjian Tian, Junxia Gao, Huimin Liu, Suhua Shi, Jinxia Ni, Rongdan Xue, Hui Hu, Min Chen, Shuguang Yu, Zhigang Li","doi":"10.1007/s11684-024-1073-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have confirmed that acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) provided an additional benefit over usual care alone. Therefore, we performed a multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture versus sham acupuncture for refractory IBS in patients in the context of conventional treatments. Patients in the acupuncture and sham acupuncture groups received real or sham acupuncture treatment in 3 sessions per week for a total of 12 sessions. The primary outcome was a change in the IBS-Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) score from baseline to week 4. A total of 521 participants were screened, and 170 patients (85 patients per group) were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Baseline characteristics were comparable across the two groups. From baseline to 4 weeks, the IBS-SSS total score decreased by 140.0 (95% CI: 126.0 to 153.9) in the acupuncture group and 64.4 (95% CI: 50.4 to 78.3) in the sham acupuncture group. The between-group difference was 75.6 (95% CI: 55.8 to 95.4). Acupuncture efficacy was maintained during the 4-week follow-up period. There were no serious adverse events. In conclusion, acupuncture provided benefits when combined with treatment as usual, providing more options for the treatment of refractory IBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12558,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-024-1073-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have confirmed that acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) provided an additional benefit over usual care alone. Therefore, we performed a multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture versus sham acupuncture for refractory IBS in patients in the context of conventional treatments. Patients in the acupuncture and sham acupuncture groups received real or sham acupuncture treatment in 3 sessions per week for a total of 12 sessions. The primary outcome was a change in the IBS-Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) score from baseline to week 4. A total of 521 participants were screened, and 170 patients (85 patients per group) were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Baseline characteristics were comparable across the two groups. From baseline to 4 weeks, the IBS-SSS total score decreased by 140.0 (95% CI: 126.0 to 153.9) in the acupuncture group and 64.4 (95% CI: 50.4 to 78.3) in the sham acupuncture group. The between-group difference was 75.6 (95% CI: 55.8 to 95.4). Acupuncture efficacy was maintained during the 4-week follow-up period. There were no serious adverse events. In conclusion, acupuncture provided benefits when combined with treatment as usual, providing more options for the treatment of refractory IBS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针灸对难治性肠易激综合征患者的疗效:随机对照试验。
以往的研究证实,针灸治疗肠易激综合征(IBS)比单纯的常规治疗更有疗效。因此,我们进行了一项多中心、随机、假对照试验,以评估针灸与假针灸治疗难治性肠易激综合征患者的疗效和安全性。针灸组和假针灸组患者接受真针灸或假针灸治疗,每周 3 次,共 12 次。主要结果是肠易激综合征症状严重程度量表(IBS-SSS)评分从基线到第4周的变化。共筛选出 521 名参与者,其中 170 名患者(每组 85 名)被纳入意向治疗分析。两组患者的基线特征具有可比性。从基线到4周,针灸组的IBS-SSS总分下降了140.0(95% CI:126.0至153.9),假针灸组下降了64.4(95% CI:50.4至78.3)。组间差异为 75.6(95% CI:55.8 至 95.4)。针灸疗效在 4 周的随访期间得以保持。没有出现严重的不良反应。总之,针灸与常规治疗相结合可产生疗效,为治疗难治性肠易激综合征提供了更多选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers of Medicine
Frontiers of Medicine ONCOLOGYMEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL&-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
800
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Medicine is an international general medical journal sponsored by the Ministry of Education of China. The journal is jointly published by the Higher Education Press and Springer. Since the first issue of 2010, this journal has been indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE. Frontiers of Medicine is dedicated to publishing original research and review articles on the latest advances in clinical and basic medicine with a focus on epidemiology, traditional Chinese medicine, translational research, healthcare, public health and health policies.
期刊最新文献
Identification of susceptibility loci and relevant cell type for IgA nephropathy in Han Chinese by integrative genome-wide analysis. Epigenetic modifiers: catalytic or noncatalytic, that is the question. Intracellular checkpoints for NK cell cancer immunotherapy. PAK5-mediated PKM2 phosphorylation is critical for anaerobic glycolysis in endometriosis. Holistic Integrative Medicine Declaration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1