Lenvatinib radiofrequency ablation sequential therapy offers survival benefits for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma at intermediate stage and the liver reserve of Child-Pugh A category: A multicenter study.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Hepatology Research Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1111/hepr.14089
Ying Zhang, Kazushi Numata, Kento Imajo, Haruki Uojima, Akihiro Funaoka, Satoshi Komiyama, Katsuaki Ogushi, Makoto Chuma, Kuniyasu Irie, Shigehiro Kokubu, Masato Yoneda, Takashi Kobayashi, Hisashi Hidaka, Taito Fukushima, Satoshi Kobayashi, Manabu Morimoto, Tatehiro Kagawa, Nobuhiro Hattori, Tsunamasa Watanabe, Shigeru Iwase, Shin Maeda
{"title":"Lenvatinib radiofrequency ablation sequential therapy offers survival benefits for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma at intermediate stage and the liver reserve of Child-Pugh A category: A multicenter study.","authors":"Ying Zhang, Kazushi Numata, Kento Imajo, Haruki Uojima, Akihiro Funaoka, Satoshi Komiyama, Katsuaki Ogushi, Makoto Chuma, Kuniyasu Irie, Shigehiro Kokubu, Masato Yoneda, Takashi Kobayashi, Hisashi Hidaka, Taito Fukushima, Satoshi Kobayashi, Manabu Morimoto, Tatehiro Kagawa, Nobuhiro Hattori, Tsunamasa Watanabe, Shigeru Iwase, Shin Maeda","doi":"10.1111/hepr.14089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib radiofrequency ablation (RFA) sequential therapy for certain hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and nineteen patients with unresectable HCC in the intermediate stage with Child-Pugh A were retrospectively recruited in a multicenter setting. Those in the lenvatinib RFA sequential therapy group received lenvatinib initially, followed by RFA and the retreatment with lenvatinib. The study compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and adverse events (AEs) between patients undergoing sequential therapy and lenvatinib monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 25 patients on sequential therapy and 50 on monotherapy were evaluated. Independent factors influencing OS were identified as sequential therapy, modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade, and relative dose intensity (%) with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.381 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.186-0.782), 2.220 (95% CI, 1.410-3.493), and 0.982 (95% CI, 0.966-0.999), respectively. Stratified analysis based on mALBI grades confirmed the independent influence of treatment strategy across all mALBI grades for OS (HR, 0.376; 95% CI, 0.176-0.804). Furthermore, sequential therapy was identified as an independent factor of PFS (HR, 0.382; 95% CI, 0.215-0.678). Sequential therapy significantly outperformed monotherapy on survival benefits (OS: 38.27 vs. 18.96 months for sequential therapy and monotherapy, respectively, p = 0.004; PFS: 13.80 vs. 5.32 months for sequential therapy and monotherapy, respectively, p < 0.001). Sequential therapy was significantly associated with complete response by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (odds ratio, 63.089). Ten of 119 patients experienced grade 3 AEs, with no AE beyond grade 3 observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lenvatinib RFA sequential therapy might offer favorable tolerability and potential prognostic improvement compared to lenvatinib monotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12987,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.14089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib radiofrequency ablation (RFA) sequential therapy for certain hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

Methods: One hundred and nineteen patients with unresectable HCC in the intermediate stage with Child-Pugh A were retrospectively recruited in a multicenter setting. Those in the lenvatinib RFA sequential therapy group received lenvatinib initially, followed by RFA and the retreatment with lenvatinib. The study compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and adverse events (AEs) between patients undergoing sequential therapy and lenvatinib monotherapy.

Results: After propensity score matching, 25 patients on sequential therapy and 50 on monotherapy were evaluated. Independent factors influencing OS were identified as sequential therapy, modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade, and relative dose intensity (%) with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.381 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.186-0.782), 2.220 (95% CI, 1.410-3.493), and 0.982 (95% CI, 0.966-0.999), respectively. Stratified analysis based on mALBI grades confirmed the independent influence of treatment strategy across all mALBI grades for OS (HR, 0.376; 95% CI, 0.176-0.804). Furthermore, sequential therapy was identified as an independent factor of PFS (HR, 0.382; 95% CI, 0.215-0.678). Sequential therapy significantly outperformed monotherapy on survival benefits (OS: 38.27 vs. 18.96 months for sequential therapy and monotherapy, respectively, p = 0.004; PFS: 13.80 vs. 5.32 months for sequential therapy and monotherapy, respectively, p < 0.001). Sequential therapy was significantly associated with complete response by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (odds ratio, 63.089). Ten of 119 patients experienced grade 3 AEs, with no AE beyond grade 3 observed.

Conclusion: Lenvatinib RFA sequential therapy might offer favorable tolerability and potential prognostic improvement compared to lenvatinib monotherapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伦伐替尼射频消融序贯疗法为中期不可切除肝细胞癌和Child-Pugh A类肝储备患者带来生存获益:一项多中心研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估来伐替尼射频消融(RFA)序贯疗法对某些肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的疗效和安全性:在多中心背景下,回顾性招募了119例Child-Pugh A中期不可切除的HCC患者。来伐替尼RFA序贯治疗组患者首先接受来伐替尼治疗,然后接受RFA治疗和来伐替尼再治疗。研究比较了接受序贯疗法和来伐替尼单药治疗的患者的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、肿瘤反应和不良事件(AEs):经过倾向评分匹配,对25名接受序贯疗法的患者和50名接受单药疗法的患者进行了评估。影响OS的独立因素为序贯疗法、改良白蛋白-胆红素(mALBI)分级和相对剂量强度(%),其危险比(HR)分别为0.381(95%置信区间[CI],0.186-0.782)、2.220(95% CI,1.410-3.493)和0.982(95% CI,0.966-0.999)。基于mALBI分级的分层分析证实,所有mALBI分级的治疗策略对OS都有独立影响(HR,0.376;95% CI,0.176-0.804)。此外,序贯疗法被认为是影响 PFS 的一个独立因素(HR,0.382;95% CI,0.215-0.678)。序贯疗法的生存获益明显优于单药疗法(OS:序贯疗法和单药疗法分别为 38.27 个月和 18.96 个月,P = 0.004;PFS:序贯疗法和单药疗法分别为 13.80 个月和 5.32 个月,P 结论:与来伐替尼单药治疗相比,来伐替尼RFA序贯治疗可提供良好的耐受性和潜在的预后改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology Research
Hepatology Research 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
124
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hepatology Research (formerly International Hepatology Communications) is the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology, and publishes original articles, reviews and short comunications dealing with hepatology. Reviews or mini-reviews are especially welcomed from those areas within hepatology undergoing rapid changes. Short communications should contain concise definitive information.
期刊最新文献
Hepatic Mac2‐BP expression depends on liver fibrosis and inflammation due to fat accumulation in patients with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease Issue Information Elevated nuclear expression of ZHX1 correlates with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Comparison of nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution of the ZHX family in HCC cells. Efficacy of steroid therapy for improving native liver survival after pediatric acute liver failure with immune activation. Hepatitis B surface antigen glycan isomer as a new potential biomarker in patients with hepatitis B virus infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1