Test-Retest Reliability of Movement Displacement during a 20-s Stepping-in-Place Test in Community-Dwelling Older Adults with and without Supportive Care.
Eiji Fujita, Nobuo Takeshima, Hideto Sato, Takeshi Kohama, Masanobu Kusunoki, Yukiya Oba, William F Brechue
{"title":"Test-Retest Reliability of Movement Displacement during a 20-s Stepping-in-Place Test in Community-Dwelling Older Adults with and without Supportive Care.","authors":"Eiji Fujita, Nobuo Takeshima, Hideto Sato, Takeshi Kohama, Masanobu Kusunoki, Yukiya Oba, William F Brechue","doi":"10.1159/000539748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our recent reports have shown that movement pattern and displacement assessed with an infrared depth sensor during a 20-s stepping-in-place test (ST) correlates with measures of balance and need for assistance in older individuals. This study investigated ST test-retest reliability in community-dwelling older adults with and without supportive care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two groups were included: those not participating (HO: n = 25, 74.7 ± 5.2 years) and those participating (DSU: n = 41, 78.8 ± 5.8 years) in regular senior day services (supportive care). HO completed three ST trials, separated by 1 week, while DSU completed two ST trials during the same half-day supportive care visit. Testing was conducted with eyes open. ST measures included head movement path distance (TMD), maximum movement displacement (MMD), knee movement path length (KMD), and stepping rate (STEP). TMD×KMD-1 ratio indicated upper-body sway relative to lower-body. Test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients, ICCs) and between-trial and between group differences (ANCOVA, adjusting for age) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for age, TMD, KMD, TMD×KMD-1 were lesser and STEP was greater in HO than DUS. HO ST variables did not differ across testing days. HO ICC (1, 3) for TMD (0.911 [95% confidence interval: 0.827-0.958]), MMD (0.918 [0.814-0.961]), KMD (0.838 [0.685-0.923]), and TMD×KMD-1 (0.940 [0.884-0.872]) showed strong to very strong reliability. Similarly, DSU ST variables did not differ across same day trials and ICC (1, 2) for TMD, KMD, and TMD×KMD-1 displayed very strong reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These ST variables exhibited excellent test-retest reliability of discriminating between community-dwelling older adults with and without supportive care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12662,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"970-977"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Our recent reports have shown that movement pattern and displacement assessed with an infrared depth sensor during a 20-s stepping-in-place test (ST) correlates with measures of balance and need for assistance in older individuals. This study investigated ST test-retest reliability in community-dwelling older adults with and without supportive care.
Methods: Two groups were included: those not participating (HO: n = 25, 74.7 ± 5.2 years) and those participating (DSU: n = 41, 78.8 ± 5.8 years) in regular senior day services (supportive care). HO completed three ST trials, separated by 1 week, while DSU completed two ST trials during the same half-day supportive care visit. Testing was conducted with eyes open. ST measures included head movement path distance (TMD), maximum movement displacement (MMD), knee movement path length (KMD), and stepping rate (STEP). TMD×KMD-1 ratio indicated upper-body sway relative to lower-body. Test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients, ICCs) and between-trial and between group differences (ANCOVA, adjusting for age) were assessed.
Results: After adjusting for age, TMD, KMD, TMD×KMD-1 were lesser and STEP was greater in HO than DUS. HO ST variables did not differ across testing days. HO ICC (1, 3) for TMD (0.911 [95% confidence interval: 0.827-0.958]), MMD (0.918 [0.814-0.961]), KMD (0.838 [0.685-0.923]), and TMD×KMD-1 (0.940 [0.884-0.872]) showed strong to very strong reliability. Similarly, DSU ST variables did not differ across same day trials and ICC (1, 2) for TMD, KMD, and TMD×KMD-1 displayed very strong reliability.
Conclusion: These ST variables exhibited excellent test-retest reliability of discriminating between community-dwelling older adults with and without supportive care.
期刊介绍：
In view of the ever-increasing fraction of elderly people, understanding the mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases has become a matter of urgent necessity. ''Gerontology'', the oldest journal in the field, responds to this need by drawing topical contributions from multiple disciplines to support the fundamental goals of extending active life and enhancing its quality. The range of papers is classified into four sections. In the Clinical Section, the aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of agerelated diseases are discussed from a gerontological rather than a geriatric viewpoint. The Experimental Section contains up-to-date contributions from basic gerontological research. Papers dealing with behavioural development and related topics are placed in the Behavioural Science Section. Basic aspects of regeneration in different experimental biological systems as well as in the context of medical applications are dealt with in a special section that also contains information on technological advances for the elderly. Providing a primary source of high-quality papers covering all aspects of aging in humans and animals, ''Gerontology'' serves as an ideal information tool for all readers interested in the topic of aging from a broad perspective.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
