Analysis of Intraocular Lens Packaging Weight and Waste.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of cataract and refractive surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001514
Andrew Keyser, David F Chang, Cassandra Thiel, John Hovanesian
{"title":"Analysis of Intraocular Lens Packaging Weight and Waste.","authors":"Andrew Keyser, David F Chang, Cassandra Thiel, John Hovanesian","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze waste from intraocular lens (IOL) packaging across a variety of brands.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective weight and composition analysis of all elements of unopened packages of IOLs sold in the US-both preloaded and non-preloaded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Samples were collected from multiple IOL companies in 2023. The primary endpoint for comparison was the total weight of each IOL package, because this generally correlates with the carbon footprint. The percentage of total weight contributed by paper, plastic, Tyvek®, foil, sterile saline solution (fluid), metal, or glossy paper material was also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The non-preloaded IOL package weights ranged from 29 g (Zeiss Lucia) to 80 g (RxSIGHT LAL). Most of the weight was attributable to paper, including the box and instructions for use (IFU) pamphlet. The latter was generally the largest component within the box. The weights of preloaded IOL packages were generally higher than those of their non-preloaded counterparts and ranged from 67 g (Hoya iSert) to 116 g (Rayner RayOne Spheric).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Meaningful differences in the IOL packaging weight and waste were noted across different models and manufacturers. Electronic IFU linked to QR codes could replace the need for an IFU pamphlet within every box, significantly reducing the box's size, weight, and carbon footprint. Pairing preloaded IOL cartridges with autoclavable injectors could reduce associated waste. Because of the enormous global volume of IOL implantation, these waste-reducing strategies should be prioritized by IOL manufacturers.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze waste from intraocular lens (IOL) packaging across a variety of brands.

Setting: Private clinical practice.

Design: Prospective weight and composition analysis of all elements of unopened packages of IOLs sold in the US-both preloaded and non-preloaded.

Methods: Samples were collected from multiple IOL companies in 2023. The primary endpoint for comparison was the total weight of each IOL package, because this generally correlates with the carbon footprint. The percentage of total weight contributed by paper, plastic, Tyvek®, foil, sterile saline solution (fluid), metal, or glossy paper material was also calculated.

Results: The non-preloaded IOL package weights ranged from 29 g (Zeiss Lucia) to 80 g (RxSIGHT LAL). Most of the weight was attributable to paper, including the box and instructions for use (IFU) pamphlet. The latter was generally the largest component within the box. The weights of preloaded IOL packages were generally higher than those of their non-preloaded counterparts and ranged from 67 g (Hoya iSert) to 116 g (Rayner RayOne Spheric).

Conclusions: Meaningful differences in the IOL packaging weight and waste were noted across different models and manufacturers. Electronic IFU linked to QR codes could replace the need for an IFU pamphlet within every box, significantly reducing the box's size, weight, and carbon footprint. Pairing preloaded IOL cartridges with autoclavable injectors could reduce associated waste. Because of the enormous global volume of IOL implantation, these waste-reducing strategies should be prioritized by IOL manufacturers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼内透镜包装重量和废物分析。
目的:分析各种品牌眼内晶体(IOL)包装产生的废弃物:私人临床实践:设计:对在美国销售的未开封人工晶体包装(包括预装和非预装)的所有成分进行前瞻性重量和成分分析:方法:2023 年从多家人工晶体公司收集样本。比较的主要终点是每个人工晶体包装的总重量,因为这通常与碳足迹相关。此外,还计算了纸、塑料、特卫强®、箔、无菌生理盐水(液体)、金属或光面纸材料占总重量的百分比:结果:非预载人工晶体包装重量从29克(蔡司Lucia)到80克(RxSIGHT LAL)不等。大部分重量来自纸张,包括包装盒和使用说明 (IFU) 小册子。后者通常是包装盒中最大的组成部分。预装人工晶体包装的重量普遍高于未预装的同类产品,从 67 克(Hoya iSert)到 116 克(Rayner RayOne Spheric)不等:结论:不同型号和制造商的人工晶体包装在重量和浪费方面存在明显差异。与 QR 码相连的电子 IFU 可以取代每个包装盒内的 IFU 小册子,从而大大减少包装盒的尺寸、重量和碳足迹。将预装人工晶体盒与可高温高压灭菌的注射器配对使用,可减少相关浪费。由于全球人工晶体植入数量巨大,人工晶体制造商应优先考虑这些减少浪费的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
期刊最新文献
Ocular Shape of Cataract with Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Case-Control Study. Intraocular Lens Rotational Stability after Cataract Surgery with and without Primary Posterior Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorrhexis. Risk of Zonular Dialysis in Fellow-Eye Cataract Surgeries: A Multicenter Comparative Study. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in patients with endothelial dystrophy without edema. Analysis of the ESCRS calculator's prediction accuracy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1