Preliminary Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of the "No-Punch" Decompression Techniques for Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurospine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-30 DOI:10.14245/ns.2448376.188
Jwo-Luen Pao
{"title":"Preliminary Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of the \"No-Punch\" Decompression Techniques for Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery.","authors":"Jwo-Luen Pao","doi":"10.14245/ns.2448376.188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To avoid the most offending surgical instrument for dural tears, we develop a \"no-punch\" decompression technique for unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled 68 consecutive patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis segments. The treatment results were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for low back and leg pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiological outcomes were evaluated using the preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 36 male and 32 female patients who received 109 segments of decompression, with an average age of 68.7 (37-90 years). The average operation time was 52.2 minutes. The average hospital stay was 3.1 days. There were no dural tears but 3 minor surgical complications, all treated conservatively. The VAS for low back and leg pain improved from 4.6 and 7.0 to 0.8 and 1.2. The JOA score improved from 16.2 to 26.8, with an improvement rate of 82.0%. The ODI improved from 50.1 to 18.7. All these improvements were statistically significant. The cross-sectional dural area improved from 61.1 to 151.3 mm2, with an average increase of 90.2 mm2 and 205.3%. 87.1% of the ipsilateral facet joints and 84.7% of the contralateral facet joints were preserved. In 61% of the decompressed segments, the ipsilateral facet joints were preserved better than the contralateral facet joints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The UBE \"no-punch\" decompression technique effectively avoids the dural tears. It provides effective neural decompression, excellent facet joint preservation, and good treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":"21 2","pages":"732-741"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurospine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448376.188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To avoid the most offending surgical instrument for dural tears, we develop a "no-punch" decompression technique for unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) spine surgery.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 68 consecutive patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis segments. The treatment results were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for low back and leg pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiological outcomes were evaluated using the preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Results: This study included 36 male and 32 female patients who received 109 segments of decompression, with an average age of 68.7 (37-90 years). The average operation time was 52.2 minutes. The average hospital stay was 3.1 days. There were no dural tears but 3 minor surgical complications, all treated conservatively. The VAS for low back and leg pain improved from 4.6 and 7.0 to 0.8 and 1.2. The JOA score improved from 16.2 to 26.8, with an improvement rate of 82.0%. The ODI improved from 50.1 to 18.7. All these improvements were statistically significant. The cross-sectional dural area improved from 61.1 to 151.3 mm2, with an average increase of 90.2 mm2 and 205.3%. 87.1% of the ipsilateral facet joints and 84.7% of the contralateral facet joints were preserved. In 61% of the decompressed segments, the ipsilateral facet joints were preserved better than the contralateral facet joints.

Conclusion: The UBE "no-punch" decompression technique effectively avoids the dural tears. It provides effective neural decompression, excellent facet joint preservation, and good treatment outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单侧双侧内窥镜脊柱手术中 "不打孔 "减压技术的初步临床和放射学效果。
目的为了避免使用最容易造成硬脊膜撕裂的手术器械,我们在单侧双侧内窥镜(UBE)脊柱手术中开发了一种 "不打孔 "减压技术:这项回顾性研究连续收治了 68 名退行性腰椎管狭窄症患者。治疗结果采用腰腿痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和奥斯韦特里残疾指数(ODI)进行评估。通过术前和术后磁共振成像对放射学结果进行评估:这项研究包括 36 名男性和 32 名女性患者,他们接受了 109 节段的减压手术,平均年龄为 68.7 岁(37-90 岁)。平均手术时间为 52.2 分钟。平均住院时间为 3.1 天。手术中没有出现硬脑膜撕裂,但出现了 3 例轻微的手术并发症,均以保守治疗为主。腰痛和腿痛的 VAS 分值分别从 4.6 和 7.0 降至 0.8 和 1.2。JOA 评分从 16.2 分提高到 26.8 分,提高率为 82.0%。ODI 从 50.1 分提高到 18.7 分。所有这些改善都具有显著的统计学意义。硬膜横截面积从 61.1 平方毫米改善到 151.3 平方毫米,平均增加 90.2 平方毫米,改善率为 205.3%。87.1%的同侧面关节和84.7%的对侧面关节得到保留。在61%的减压节段中,同侧面关节的保存情况优于对侧面关节:结论:UBE "不打孔 "减压技术可有效避免硬脊膜撕裂。结论:UBE "不打孔 "减压技术可有效避免硬脊膜撕裂,提供有效的神经减压、出色的面关节保留和良好的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurospine
Neurospine Multiple-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
18.80%
发文量
93
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Self-Developed Mobility Augmented Reality System Versus Conventional X-rays for Spine Positioning in Intraspinal Tumor Surgery: A Case-Control Study. An Experimental Model for Fluid Dynamics and Pressures During Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy. Application of the "Klotski Technique" in Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament With En Bloc Type Dura Ossification. Artificial Intelligence Detection of Cervical Spine Fractures Using Convolutional Neural Network Models. Biomechanical Study of Atlanto-occipital Instability in Type II Basilar Invagination: A Finite Element Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1