Dega Osteotomy for the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip, a Clinical Evaluation and an Anatomic Study based on X-ray and CT Scan.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-06-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.120304
Wahby Shaty
{"title":"Dega Osteotomy for the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip, a Clinical Evaluation and an Anatomic Study based on X-ray and CT Scan.","authors":"Wahby Shaty","doi":"10.52965/001c.120304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dega osteotomy is becoming more widely used for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>A thorough description of this procedure is needed as many of the technical aspects are not fully defined. Moreover, more follow-up series are also needed to evaluate its outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we gave a detailed anatomic description for this procedure and also presented our experience as a retrospective radiographic and case-note study. We examined the clinical and radiographic records of 44 patients (48 hips) with varying degrees of DDH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of the patients was 2 months and 7 months while the average follow up period was 41 months. Clinical and radiographic assessment including CT with 3D reconstruction to examine the anatomic characteristics of the osteotomy were undertaken. We found that concentric reduction was achieved in 93.7% with excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes. Only 3 cases needed revision of the Dega osteotomy. The re-operation rate was 12.5%. CT scan revealed that the arcuate line was crossed by the osteotomy in the majority of cases. In 20.7% of cases, a bone cut that was intended to be a Dega osteotomy was found to have been inadvertently implemented as another osteotomy variant. However, this bore no significant effect on the outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that a well-implemented Dega osteotomy is a reliable tool to cope with the acetabular changes in DDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"16 ","pages":"120304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11218868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.120304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dega osteotomy is becoming more widely used for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

Objective: A thorough description of this procedure is needed as many of the technical aspects are not fully defined. Moreover, more follow-up series are also needed to evaluate its outcomes.

Methods: In this study, we gave a detailed anatomic description for this procedure and also presented our experience as a retrospective radiographic and case-note study. We examined the clinical and radiographic records of 44 patients (48 hips) with varying degrees of DDH.

Results: The average age of the patients was 2 months and 7 months while the average follow up period was 41 months. Clinical and radiographic assessment including CT with 3D reconstruction to examine the anatomic characteristics of the osteotomy were undertaken. We found that concentric reduction was achieved in 93.7% with excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes. Only 3 cases needed revision of the Dega osteotomy. The re-operation rate was 12.5%. CT scan revealed that the arcuate line was crossed by the osteotomy in the majority of cases. In 20.7% of cases, a bone cut that was intended to be a Dega osteotomy was found to have been inadvertently implemented as another osteotomy variant. However, this bore no significant effect on the outcome.

Conclusion: We found that a well-implemented Dega osteotomy is a reliable tool to cope with the acetabular changes in DDH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗髋关节发育不良的 Dega 截骨术,基于 X 射线和 CT 扫描的临床评估和解剖研究。
背景:Dega截骨术越来越广泛地用于治疗髋关节发育不良(DDH):Dega截骨术越来越广泛地用于治疗髋关节发育不良(DDH):目标:由于许多技术方面尚未完全明确,因此需要对该手术进行全面描述。此外,还需要更多的随访系列来评估其疗效:在本研究中,我们对该手术进行了详细的解剖学描述,并以回顾性放射影像学和病例记录研究的形式介绍了我们的经验。我们检查了 44 例不同程度 DDH 患者(48 髋)的临床和影像学记录:患者的平均年龄为 2 个月和 7 个月,平均随访时间为 41 个月。我们对患者进行了临床和放射学评估,包括三维重建 CT,以检查截骨的解剖特征。我们发现,93.7%的病例实现了同心缩窄,临床和影像学效果极佳。只有 3 例患者需要对 Dega 截骨术进行翻修。再次手术率为 12.5%。CT 扫描显示,在大多数病例中,截骨术跨越了弧形线。在20.7%的病例中,本应作为Dega截骨术的切骨被发现无意中作为另一种截骨变体实施。然而,这对结果并无明显影响:我们发现,实施得当的 Dega 截骨术是应对 DDH 髋臼变化的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
期刊最新文献
Haemodynamics, side effects and safety of the combination of continuous femoral nerve block and intravenous parecoxib for pain management after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A pilot study. Practice Patterns of Physicians who Perform Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections. Lateral ligament reconstruction and additive medial ligament reconstruction in chronic ankle instability: a retrospective study. Anesthetic Management of a Patient with Renal Cell Carcinoma-Associated Venous Thrombosis and Massive Transfusion. Comparative assessment of bone cement implantation syndrome in cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty: impact in patients with and without preexisting heart disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1