Conservative Management of Occipital Neuralgia Supported by Physical Therapy: A Review of Available Research and Mechanistic Rationale to Guide Treatment.
Daniel Deuel, Andrew Sandgren, Evan O Nelson, Michael Cropes, Albojay Deacon, Tiffany Houdek, Alaa Abd-Elsayed
{"title":"Conservative Management of Occipital Neuralgia Supported by Physical Therapy: A Review of Available Research and Mechanistic Rationale to Guide Treatment.","authors":"Daniel Deuel, Andrew Sandgren, Evan O Nelson, Michael Cropes, Albojay Deacon, Tiffany Houdek, Alaa Abd-Elsayed","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01288-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Conservative management is consistently recommended as a first line intervention for occipital neuralgia (ON); however, there is limited clinical research regarding conservative intervention for ON. This lack of research may lead to underutilization or unwarranted variability in conservative treatment. This article provides mechanism-based guidance for conservative management of ON as a component of a multimodal treatment approach, and discusses the role of the physical therapist in the care team. It also highlights opportunities for further research to refine conservative management of this condition.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Published research on conservative interventions specific to ON is limited to very low-quality evidence for the use of TENS. The contemporary shift toward precision pain management emphasizing treatment based on a patient's constellation of clinical features-a phenotype-rather than solely a diagnosis provides more personalized and specifically targeted pain treatment. This paradigm can guide treatment in cases where diagnosis-specific research is lacking and can be used to inform conservative treatment in this case. Various conservative interventions have demonstrated efficacy in treating many of the symptoms and accepted etiologies of ON. Conservative interventions provided by a physical therapist including exercise, manual therapy, posture and biomechanical training, TENS, patient education, and desensitization have mechanistic justification to treat symptoms and causes of ON. Physical therapists have adequate time and skill to provide such progressive and iterative interventions and should be included in a multimodal treatment plan for ON. Further research is required to determine appropriate dosing, sequencing, and progression of conservative treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01288-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: Conservative management is consistently recommended as a first line intervention for occipital neuralgia (ON); however, there is limited clinical research regarding conservative intervention for ON. This lack of research may lead to underutilization or unwarranted variability in conservative treatment. This article provides mechanism-based guidance for conservative management of ON as a component of a multimodal treatment approach, and discusses the role of the physical therapist in the care team. It also highlights opportunities for further research to refine conservative management of this condition.
Recent findings: Published research on conservative interventions specific to ON is limited to very low-quality evidence for the use of TENS. The contemporary shift toward precision pain management emphasizing treatment based on a patient's constellation of clinical features-a phenotype-rather than solely a diagnosis provides more personalized and specifically targeted pain treatment. This paradigm can guide treatment in cases where diagnosis-specific research is lacking and can be used to inform conservative treatment in this case. Various conservative interventions have demonstrated efficacy in treating many of the symptoms and accepted etiologies of ON. Conservative interventions provided by a physical therapist including exercise, manual therapy, posture and biomechanical training, TENS, patient education, and desensitization have mechanistic justification to treat symptoms and causes of ON. Physical therapists have adequate time and skill to provide such progressive and iterative interventions and should be included in a multimodal treatment plan for ON. Further research is required to determine appropriate dosing, sequencing, and progression of conservative treatments.
综述目的:保守治疗一直被推荐为治疗枕神经痛(ON)的一线干预措施;然而,有关枕神经痛保守治疗的临床研究却十分有限。研究的缺乏可能会导致保守治疗的利用不足或不必要的变异。本文为保守治疗ON提供了基于机制的指导,将其作为多模式治疗方法的一部分,并讨论了理疗师在护理团队中的作用。文章还强调了进一步研究的机会,以完善对该病症的保守治疗:已发表的针对 ON 的保守干预研究仅限于使用 TENS 的低质量证据。当代疼痛治疗向精准化转变,强调根据患者的一系列临床特征(表型)进行治疗,而不仅仅是诊断,这提供了更加个性化和有针对性的疼痛治疗。这种模式可以在缺乏特定诊断研究的情况下指导治疗,并可用于指导本病例的保守治疗。各种保守干预已证明对治疗 ON 的许多症状和公认病因具有疗效。理疗师提供的保守干预措施包括运动、手法治疗、姿势和生物力学训练、TENS、患者教育和脱敏疗法,这些措施在治疗ON的症状和病因方面具有机理上的合理性。物理治疗师有足够的时间和技能来提供这种渐进和反复的干预措施,因此应将其纳入ON的多模式治疗计划中。要确定保守治疗的适当剂量、顺序和进展,还需要进一步的研究。
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pain and headache. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of pain and headache.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anesthetic techniques in pain management, cluster headache, neuropathic pain, and migraine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.