Biocellulose-based hydrogel dressing as a strategy for the management of chronic arterial wounds.

IF 1.3 Acta cirurgica brasileira Pub Date : 2024-07-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/acb392924
Carolina Magro Barreiros de Moraes, Arthur Mestriner Bassanelli, Lenize da Silva Rodrigues, Hernane da Silva Barud, Marina de Lima Fontes, Pedro Luiz Toledo de Arruda Lourenção, Meire Cristina Novelli E Castro, Matheus Bertanha
{"title":"Biocellulose-based hydrogel dressing as a strategy for the management of chronic arterial wounds.","authors":"Carolina Magro Barreiros de Moraes, Arthur Mestriner Bassanelli, Lenize da Silva Rodrigues, Hernane da Silva Barud, Marina de Lima Fontes, Pedro Luiz Toledo de Arruda Lourenção, Meire Cristina Novelli E Castro, Matheus Bertanha","doi":"10.1590/acb392924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate using a biocellulose-based hydrogel as an adjuvant in the healing process of arterial ulcers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective single group quasi-experimental study was carried out with chronic lower limb arterial ulcer patients. These patients received biocellulose-based hydrogel dressings and outpatient guidance on dressing and periodic reassessments. The primary outcomes were the ulcer-healing rate and product safety, which were assessed by ulcer area measured in photographic records of pre-treatment and posttreatment after 7, 30, and 60 days. Secondary outcomes were related to clinical assessment by the quality-of-life scores (SF-36 and EQ-5D) and pain, evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen participants were included, and one of them was excluded. Six patients (37%) had complete wound healing, and all patients had a significant reduction in the ulcer area during follow-up (233.6mm2 versus 2.7mm2) and reduction on the score PUSH 3.0 (p < 0.0001). The analysis of the SF-36 and EQ-5D questionnaires showed a statistically significant improvement in almost all parameters analyzed and with a reduction of pain assessed by the VAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The biocellulose-based hydrogel was safe and showed a good perspective to promoting the necessary conditions to facilitate partial or complete healing of chronic arterial ulcers within a 60-day follow-up. Quality of life and pain were positively affected by the treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93850,"journal":{"name":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","volume":"39 ","pages":"e392924"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb392924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate using a biocellulose-based hydrogel as an adjuvant in the healing process of arterial ulcers.

Methods: A prospective single group quasi-experimental study was carried out with chronic lower limb arterial ulcer patients. These patients received biocellulose-based hydrogel dressings and outpatient guidance on dressing and periodic reassessments. The primary outcomes were the ulcer-healing rate and product safety, which were assessed by ulcer area measured in photographic records of pre-treatment and posttreatment after 7, 30, and 60 days. Secondary outcomes were related to clinical assessment by the quality-of-life scores (SF-36 and EQ-5D) and pain, evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results: Seventeen participants were included, and one of them was excluded. Six patients (37%) had complete wound healing, and all patients had a significant reduction in the ulcer area during follow-up (233.6mm2 versus 2.7mm2) and reduction on the score PUSH 3.0 (p < 0.0001). The analysis of the SF-36 and EQ-5D questionnaires showed a statistically significant improvement in almost all parameters analyzed and with a reduction of pain assessed by the VAS.

Conclusions: The biocellulose-based hydrogel was safe and showed a good perspective to promoting the necessary conditions to facilitate partial or complete healing of chronic arterial ulcers within a 60-day follow-up. Quality of life and pain were positively affected by the treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将生物纤维素水凝胶敷料作为治疗慢性动脉伤口的一种策略。
目的:评估以生物纤维素为基础的水凝胶在动脉溃疡愈合过程中的辅助作用:方法:对慢性下肢动脉溃疡患者进行了一项前瞻性单组准实验研究。这些患者接受了生物纤维素水凝胶敷料、门诊敷料指导和定期复查。主要结果是溃疡愈合率和产品安全性,根据治疗前和治疗后 7 天、30 天和 60 天的照片记录测量溃疡面积来评估。次要结果与临床评估有关,采用生活质量评分(SF-36 和 EQ-5D)和疼痛,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估:结果:共纳入 17 名参与者,其中一人被排除在外。六名患者(37%)的伤口完全愈合,所有患者的溃疡面积在随访期间均显著缩小(233.6 平方毫米对 2.7 平方毫米),PUSH 3.0 评分也有所下降(P < 0.0001)。对 SF-36 和 EQ-5D 问卷的分析表明,几乎所有分析参数都有显著改善,而且 VAS 评估的疼痛也有所减轻:结论:基于生物纤维素的水凝胶是安全的,在 60 天的随访中显示出促进慢性动脉溃疡部分或完全愈合的必要条件的良好前景。治疗对生活质量和疼痛产生了积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bone health up to five years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a cross-sectional study during the COVID-19 pandemic. RETRACTION: Atractylenolide III alleviates sepsis-mediated lung injury via inhibition of FoxO1 and VNN1 protein. Academic bedside rounding in 10 As: the decalogue technique. Performance of complementary therapies in controlling inflammatory signs, symptoms, and complications after lower third molar extraction: a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles. Comparison of the effects of direct and remote ischemic post and preconditioning in the kidney of young rats: histological and laboratory evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1