Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: Interpregnancy Interval and Route of Subsequent Delivery.

Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001551
Alexandra C Nutaitis, Meng Yao, Lisa C Hickman, Swapna Kollikonda, Katie A Propst
{"title":"Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: Interpregnancy Interval and Route of Subsequent Delivery.","authors":"Alexandra C Nutaitis, Meng Yao, Lisa C Hickman, Swapna Kollikonda, Katie A Propst","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Knowledge on the interpregnancy interval (IPI) among women with an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is both limited and not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to describe the IPI among women with OASI and to compare women with OASI based on the route of subsequent obstetric delivery and OASI recurrence.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective single-cohort study of women who had an OASI between 2013 and 2015 at a tertiary academic medical center. Demographics, obstetric delivery data, postpartum sequelae, and subsequent pregnancy delivery data from 2013 to 2021 were collected. The IPI was defined as the time from date of first vaginal delivery to date of conception of the subsequent pregnancy. Women without a subsequent pregnancy were censored at the date of last contact. The IPI was evaluated using a survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier estimator).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 287 women experienced an OASI, and subsequent pregnancy occurred for 178 (62.0%) women. The median IPI was 26.4 months (95% confidence interval: 23.7-29.9) for women with a prior OASI. Of the 97 women who did not have a subsequent pregnancy documented during the study, the median follow-up was 64.0 months (interquartile range: 5.7-80.0). Subsequent delivery route data were available for 171 women; of those, 127 (74.3%) experienced a subsequent vaginal delivery and 44 (25.7%) experienced a cesarean delivery. Of the 127 women who experienced a subsequent vaginal delivery, 3 (2.4%) experienced a recurrent OASI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IPI among women with OASI is similar to the IPI for all women in Ohio and in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Knowledge on the interpregnancy interval (IPI) among women with an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is both limited and not well understood.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe the IPI among women with OASI and to compare women with OASI based on the route of subsequent obstetric delivery and OASI recurrence.

Study design: This was a retrospective single-cohort study of women who had an OASI between 2013 and 2015 at a tertiary academic medical center. Demographics, obstetric delivery data, postpartum sequelae, and subsequent pregnancy delivery data from 2013 to 2021 were collected. The IPI was defined as the time from date of first vaginal delivery to date of conception of the subsequent pregnancy. Women without a subsequent pregnancy were censored at the date of last contact. The IPI was evaluated using a survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier estimator).

Results: A total of 287 women experienced an OASI, and subsequent pregnancy occurred for 178 (62.0%) women. The median IPI was 26.4 months (95% confidence interval: 23.7-29.9) for women with a prior OASI. Of the 97 women who did not have a subsequent pregnancy documented during the study, the median follow-up was 64.0 months (interquartile range: 5.7-80.0). Subsequent delivery route data were available for 171 women; of those, 127 (74.3%) experienced a subsequent vaginal delivery and 44 (25.7%) experienced a cesarean delivery. Of the 127 women who experienced a subsequent vaginal delivery, 3 (2.4%) experienced a recurrent OASI.

Conclusion: The IPI among women with OASI is similar to the IPI for all women in Ohio and in the United States.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
产科肛门括约肌损伤:妊娠间隔和后续分娩途径。
重要性:有关产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)产妇的产程间隔(IPI)的知识非常有限,而且人们对其了解不多:本研究的目的是描述产科肛门括约肌损伤妇女的IPI,并根据产后分娩途径和产科肛门括约肌损伤复发情况对产科肛门括约肌损伤妇女进行比较:这是一项回顾性单队列研究,研究对象是2013年至2015年期间在一家三级学术医疗中心发生过OASI的女性。研究收集了2013年至2021年期间的人口统计学、产科分娩数据、产后后遗症和后续妊娠分娩数据。IPI的定义是从首次阴道分娩日期到再次怀孕受孕日期的时间。没有再次怀孕的妇女在最后一次接触之日即被剔除。IPI 采用生存分析法(卡普兰-梅耶估计法)进行评估:结果:共有 287 名妇女经历了 OASI,其中 178 名妇女(62.0%)随后怀孕。曾有过 OASI 的妇女的 IPI 中位数为 26.4 个月(95% 置信区间:23.7-29.9)。在研究期间未记录后续妊娠的 97 名妇女中,中位随访时间为 64.0 个月(四分位间范围:5.7-80.0)。有 171 名妇女的后续分娩途径数据,其中 127 人(74.3%)经历了阴道分娩,44 人(25.7%)经历了剖宫产。在这 127 名再次经历阴道分娩的产妇中,有 3 人(2.4%)再次发生 OASI:结论:患有 OASI 的妇女的 IPI 与俄亥俄州和美国所有妇女的 IPI 相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1