Development, validity, and reliability assessment of the Canadian Food Literacy Measure.

Alicia E Martin, Angela Wallace, Raphaëlle Jacob, Marciane Any, Amar Laila, Kimberley Hernandez, Maude Perreault, Joy M Hutchinson, Adam Sadowski, Amina Saher, Veronique Dorais, Sharon I Kirkpatrick, Jess Haines
{"title":"Development, validity, and reliability assessment of the Canadian Food Literacy Measure.","authors":"Alicia E Martin, Angela Wallace, Raphaëlle Jacob, Marciane Any, Amar Laila, Kimberley Hernandez, Maude Perreault, Joy M Hutchinson, Adam Sadowski, Amina Saher, Veronique Dorais, Sharon I Kirkpatrick, Jess Haines","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2024-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Food literacy is a growing area of interest given its potential to support healthy and sustainable diets. Most existing food literacy measures focus on nutrition and food skills but fail to address food systems and socio-environmental aspects of food literacy. Further, measures developed and tested in the Canadian context are lacking. The objective of this project was to develop and test the validity and reliability of a brief self-administered measure, in French and English, designed to assess multiple dimensions of food literacy among adults living in Canada. The 23-item Canadian Food Literacy Measure was developed through an iterative process that included assessment of face and content validity through expert review (<i>n</i> = 20) and cognitive interviews (<i>n</i> = 20) and construct validity and reliability, i.e., internal consistency through an online survey (<i>n</i> = 154). The results indicate that the measure is well understood by both English- and French-speaking adults. The measure's construct validity is demonstrated by the observed differences in total scores in hypothesized directions by gender (<i>p</i> = 0.003), age (<i>p</i> = 0.007), education level (<i>p</i> = 0.002), health literacy (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and smoking status (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and the significant positive correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.29; <i>p</i> = 0.002) between total scores and fruit and vegetable intake. The measure also has high internal consistency with a Cronbach's coefficient alpha of 0.80. This measure can be used in surveillance studies to provide insight into the food literacy of adults living in Canada and in epidemiologic research that aims to explore how food literacy is associated with a variety of health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93878,"journal":{"name":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food literacy is a growing area of interest given its potential to support healthy and sustainable diets. Most existing food literacy measures focus on nutrition and food skills but fail to address food systems and socio-environmental aspects of food literacy. Further, measures developed and tested in the Canadian context are lacking. The objective of this project was to develop and test the validity and reliability of a brief self-administered measure, in French and English, designed to assess multiple dimensions of food literacy among adults living in Canada. The 23-item Canadian Food Literacy Measure was developed through an iterative process that included assessment of face and content validity through expert review (n = 20) and cognitive interviews (n = 20) and construct validity and reliability, i.e., internal consistency through an online survey (n = 154). The results indicate that the measure is well understood by both English- and French-speaking adults. The measure's construct validity is demonstrated by the observed differences in total scores in hypothesized directions by gender (p = 0.003), age (p = 0.007), education level (p = 0.002), health literacy (p < 0.001) and smoking status (p = 0.001), and the significant positive correlation (r = 0.29; p = 0.002) between total scores and fruit and vegetable intake. The measure also has high internal consistency with a Cronbach's coefficient alpha of 0.80. This measure can be used in surveillance studies to provide insight into the food literacy of adults living in Canada and in epidemiologic research that aims to explore how food literacy is associated with a variety of health outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大食品知识测量法》的开发、有效性和可靠性评估。
鉴于食物素养在支持健康和可持续饮食方面的潜力,食物素养是一个日益受到关注的领域。大多数现有的食物素养衡量标准都侧重于营养和食物技能,但没有涉及食物素养的食物系统和社会环境方面。此外,还缺乏在加拿大背景下开发和测试的措施。本项目的目标是开发和测试一种简短的自填式测量方法的有效性和可靠性,该方法有法语和英语两种语言,旨在评估加拿大成年人的多方面食物素养。加拿大食物素养测量法》共有 23 个项目,在开发过程中经历了一个反复的过程,包括通过专家评审(20 人)和认知访谈(20 人)评估表面和内容的有效性,以及通过在线调查(154 人)评估结构的有效性和可靠性,即内部一致性。结果表明,英语和法语成年人都能很好地理解该测量方法。根据性别(p=0.003)、年龄(p=0.007)、教育程度(p=0.002)、健康素养(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eating Traditional Foods Enhances Diet Quality Among First Nations in Canada: An Analysis Using the Healthy Eating Food Index-2019 (HEFI-2019) and the Canadian Healthy Eating Index 2007 (C-HEI 2007). Retinol-binding protein 4 is a potential biomarker of changes in lean mass in postmenopausal women. A narrative review of velocity-based training best practice: The importance of contraction intent vs. movement speed. A reduced carbohydrate diet improves glycemic regulation in hyperglycemic older people in a retirement home: The SAGE study. Feet-heating and Calf-heating have Opposing Effects on Glucose Tolerance and Heart Rate Variability: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1