Lack of consensus in inter-laboratory haematology results in selected laboratories in the southern and northern zones of Ghana.

Ibrahim B Halidu, Amos X Gafa, Samuel D K Blanney, Benjamin T Barimah, David Akan-Enge, Joseph Boachie, Kate A Kontor, Patrick Adu
{"title":"Lack of consensus in inter-laboratory haematology results in selected laboratories in the southern and northern zones of Ghana.","authors":"Ibrahim B Halidu, Amos X Gafa, Samuel D K Blanney, Benjamin T Barimah, David Akan-Enge, Joseph Boachie, Kate A Kontor, Patrick Adu","doi":"10.4314/gmj.v57i3.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the inter-laboratory comparability and intra-assay reproducibility of full blood count (FBC) results.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Exploratory cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three and two selected medical laboratories in the northern and southern zones, respectively.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty-nine individuals per zone; 16 type 2 diabetes mellitus, 16 with HbAS haemoglobin type and 17 normal samples.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Each sample was run eleven times through the analysers in the participating laboratories to evaluate intra-laboratory reproducibility and comparability of FBC results.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Intra-laboratory reproducibility was evaluated using %coefficient variation (%CV). Interlaboratory comparisons were assessed through t-test or One-Way ANOVA for two-sample and three-sample tests. All statistical testing was undertaken using the two-tailed assumption.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Statistically significantly different haemoglobin levels were estimated in both northern and southern zones (mean difference 0.00 g/dL to 3.75 g/dL vs 0.18 g/dL to 1.92 g/dL respectively). Also, total WBC counts significantly differed across laboratories in both northern and southern zones (mean difference 0.15 ×10<sup>9</sup>/L - 3.86 ×10<sup>9</sup>/L vs 0.02 ×10<sup>9</sup>/L to 1.39 ×10<sup>9</sup>/L respectively). Furthermore, platelet counts significantly differed across the participating laboratories in the northern and southern zones (mean difference 0.40 ×10<sup>9</sup>/L to 299.76 ×10<sup>9</sup>/L vs 5.7 ×10<sup>9</sup>/L to 76.9 ×10<sup>9</sup>/L respectively). Moreover, there was evidence of non-reproducibility of results within the respective laboratories in each zone as the respective %CV were outside the acceptable limits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intra-laboratory non-reproducibility and inter-laboratory non-comparability of FBC results highlight the need to establish a national quality assessment scheme to harmonise laboratory practices nationwide.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This study was funded by the University of Cape Coast Individual-Led Research Support Grant (RSG-INDI-CoHAS-2019-107).</p>","PeriodicalId":94319,"journal":{"name":"Ghana medical journal","volume":"57 3","pages":"210-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gmj.v57i3.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the inter-laboratory comparability and intra-assay reproducibility of full blood count (FBC) results.

Design: Exploratory cross-sectional study.

Setting: Three and two selected medical laboratories in the northern and southern zones, respectively.

Participants: Forty-nine individuals per zone; 16 type 2 diabetes mellitus, 16 with HbAS haemoglobin type and 17 normal samples.

Intervention: Each sample was run eleven times through the analysers in the participating laboratories to evaluate intra-laboratory reproducibility and comparability of FBC results.

Main outcome measure: Intra-laboratory reproducibility was evaluated using %coefficient variation (%CV). Interlaboratory comparisons were assessed through t-test or One-Way ANOVA for two-sample and three-sample tests. All statistical testing was undertaken using the two-tailed assumption.

Result: Statistically significantly different haemoglobin levels were estimated in both northern and southern zones (mean difference 0.00 g/dL to 3.75 g/dL vs 0.18 g/dL to 1.92 g/dL respectively). Also, total WBC counts significantly differed across laboratories in both northern and southern zones (mean difference 0.15 ×109/L - 3.86 ×109/L vs 0.02 ×109/L to 1.39 ×109/L respectively). Furthermore, platelet counts significantly differed across the participating laboratories in the northern and southern zones (mean difference 0.40 ×109/L to 299.76 ×109/L vs 5.7 ×109/L to 76.9 ×109/L respectively). Moreover, there was evidence of non-reproducibility of results within the respective laboratories in each zone as the respective %CV were outside the acceptable limits.

Conclusion: The intra-laboratory non-reproducibility and inter-laboratory non-comparability of FBC results highlight the need to establish a national quality assessment scheme to harmonise laboratory practices nationwide.

Funding: This study was funded by the University of Cape Coast Individual-Led Research Support Grant (RSG-INDI-CoHAS-2019-107).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳南部和北部选定实验室的血液学结果缺乏共识。
目的:评估全血细胞计数(FBC)结果的实验室间可比性和测定内重现性:评估全血细胞计数(FBC)结果的实验室间可比性和测定内可重复性:设计:探索性横断面研究:研究地点:北部和南部地区分别选定的三家和两家医学实验室:每个区 49 人;16 名 2 型糖尿病患者、16 名 HbAS 血红蛋白类型患者和 17 名正常样本:干预措施:每个样本在参与实验室的分析仪上运行 11 次,以评估 FBC 结果的实验室内重现性和可比性。实验室间的比较通过 t 检验或单向方差分析进行双样本和三样本检验。所有统计检验均采用双尾假设:结果:据统计,北部和南部地区的血红蛋白水平存在明显差异(平均差异分别为 0.00 g/dL 至 3.75 g/dL 与 0.18 g/dL 至 1.92 g/dL)。北部和南部地区各实验室的白细胞总数也存在显著差异(平均差异分别为 0.15 ×109/L - 3.86 ×109/L vs 0.02 ×109/L - 1.39 ×109/L)。此外,北部和南部地区参与实验室的血小板计数也存在显著差异(平均差异分别为 0.40 ×109/L - 299.76 ×109/L vs 5.7 ×109/L - 76.9 ×109/L)。此外,有证据表明,各区实验室内的结果不具有重现性,因为各自的%CV 都超出了可接受的范围:结论:实验室内FBC结果的不可再现性和实验室间的不可比性突出表明,有必要建立国家质量评估计划,以统一全国的实验室操作:本研究由海岸角大学个人主导研究支持拨款(RSG-INDI-CoHAS-2019-107)资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between adiponectin and insulin resistance among a cohort of obese adolescents and young adults in a tertiary institution. Epidemiology and factors influencing visual outcome in paediatric ocular trauma at a tertiary health institution in Ghana. Perceived facilitators and barriers to routine utilisation of standardised outcome measures among physiotherapists in Namibia. Green tea's impact on fertility hormones and oxidative stress markers in obese males with different gonadal statuses in Onitsha, Nigeria. Exploring the quality of life of caregivers of children with sickle cell disease in a secondary health facility in Ghana.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1