Trends in memory function and memory impairment among older adults in the USA and Europe, 1996-2018.

Mikko Myrskylä, Jo Mhairi Hale, Daniel C Schneider, Neil K Mehta
{"title":"Trends in memory function and memory impairment among older adults in the USA and Europe, 1996-2018.","authors":"Mikko Myrskylä, Jo Mhairi Hale, Daniel C Schneider, Neil K Mehta","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-country studies document varying time trends in memory function and impairment. Comparative analyses are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used self-respondent data on adults aged 50+ years in 13 countries from three surveys (USA: HRS, 1998-2018; England: ELSA, 2002-2018; 11 European countries: SHARE, 2004-2019). Memory is measured with tests of immediate and delayed word recall. Unweighted age- and gender-adjusted mixed effects regression models as well as models with adjustments for additional socio-demographic characteristics and health behaviors were examined. Heterogeneity in trends by gender, age group, and educational attainment were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age-adjusted 10-year improvement in average test score is 0.04 standard deviations (SDs) (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03, 0.05) in the USA, 0.17 SDs (95% CI: 0.15, 0.19) in England, and 0.24 SDs (95% CI: 0.23, 0.25) in SHARE countries. Trends are largely similar across gender, age groups, and educational attainment. Regional differences in trends remain after adjustment for potential mechanisms. Difference between the USA and other countries is particularly large under aged 75 years compared to over aged 75 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pace of improvement in memory function varies strongly across countries. On average, the 11 European countries studied had the fastest improvement, followed by England. The trend in the USA indicates improvement, but at a much slower pace compared to that in England and other European countries. Uncovering the causes for the cross-country heterogeneity in time trends, and in particular the reasons for the comparatively poor performance of the USA, should be both a research and public health priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":94243,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Single-country studies document varying time trends in memory function and impairment. Comparative analyses are limited.

Methods: We used self-respondent data on adults aged 50+ years in 13 countries from three surveys (USA: HRS, 1998-2018; England: ELSA, 2002-2018; 11 European countries: SHARE, 2004-2019). Memory is measured with tests of immediate and delayed word recall. Unweighted age- and gender-adjusted mixed effects regression models as well as models with adjustments for additional socio-demographic characteristics and health behaviors were examined. Heterogeneity in trends by gender, age group, and educational attainment were measured.

Results: The age-adjusted 10-year improvement in average test score is 0.04 standard deviations (SDs) (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03, 0.05) in the USA, 0.17 SDs (95% CI: 0.15, 0.19) in England, and 0.24 SDs (95% CI: 0.23, 0.25) in SHARE countries. Trends are largely similar across gender, age groups, and educational attainment. Regional differences in trends remain after adjustment for potential mechanisms. Difference between the USA and other countries is particularly large under aged 75 years compared to over aged 75 years.

Conclusions: Pace of improvement in memory function varies strongly across countries. On average, the 11 European countries studied had the fastest improvement, followed by England. The trend in the USA indicates improvement, but at a much slower pace compared to that in England and other European countries. Uncovering the causes for the cross-country heterogeneity in time trends, and in particular the reasons for the comparatively poor performance of the USA, should be both a research and public health priority.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1996-2018 年美国和欧洲老年人记忆功能和记忆障碍的趋势。
背景:单个国家的研究记录了记忆功能和记忆障碍的不同时间趋势。比较分析有限:我们使用了 13 个国家 50 岁以上成年人的自我应答数据,这些数据来自三次调查(美国:HRS,1998-2018 年;英国:ELSA,2002-2018 年;11 个欧洲国家:ELSA,2002-2018 年):ELSA,2002-2018 年;11 个欧洲国家:share,2004-2019 年)。记忆力通过即时和延迟单词回忆测试进行测量。对未加权的年龄和性别调整混合效应回归模型,以及对其他社会人口特征和健康行为进行调整的模型进行了研究。测量了不同性别、年龄组和教育程度的趋势异质性:结果:经年龄调整后,美国的 10 年平均测试分数提高了 0.04 个标准差(95% 置信区间:0.03, 0.05),英国提高了 0.17 个标准差(95% 置信区间:0.15, 0.19),SHARE 国家提高了 0.24 个标准差(95% 置信区间:0.23, 0.25)。不同性别、年龄组和教育程度的趋势基本相似。在对潜在机制进行调整后,地区间的趋势差异依然存在。美国与其他国家之间的差异尤其明显,75 岁以下人群与 75 岁以上人群相比差异更大:各国记忆功能改善的速度差异很大。平均而言,所研究的 11 个欧洲国家的记忆功能改善速度最快,其次是英国。美国的趋势表明记忆功能有所改善,但与英国和其他欧洲国家相比,速度要慢得多。研究和公共卫生领域的当务之急是找出各国时间趋势不同的原因,特别是美国表现相对较差的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extracellular Vesicle MicroRNAs as Predictive Biomarkers in Postoperative Delirium After Spine Surgery: Preliminary Study. Effect of Hearing Intervention Versus Health Education Control on Fatigue: A Secondary Analysis of the ACHIEVE Study. Overexpression of TIAM2S, a Critical Regulator for the Hippocampal-Medial Prefrontal Cortex Network, Progresses Age-Related Spatial Memory Impairment. Comparative Study of Antioxidant Activity of Dextran-Coated Iron Oxide, Gold, and Silver Nanoparticles Against Age-Induced Oxidative Stress in Erythrocytes. A Tale of 2 Experiences: Navigating End-of-Life Care With a History of Incarceration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1