Temporal changes in the risk of six-month post-COVID symptoms: a national population-based cohort study.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae174
Anne Pastorello, Laurence Meyer, Joël Coste, Camille Davisse-Paturet, Xavier de Lamballerie, Maria Melchior, Sophie Novelli, Delphine Rahib, Nathalie Bajos, Cécile Vuillermoz, Jeanna-Eve Franck, Carmelite Manto, Alexandra Rouquette, Josiane Warszawski
{"title":"Temporal changes in the risk of six-month post-COVID symptoms: a national population-based cohort study.","authors":"Anne Pastorello, Laurence Meyer, Joël Coste, Camille Davisse-Paturet, Xavier de Lamballerie, Maria Melchior, Sophie Novelli, Delphine Rahib, Nathalie Bajos, Cécile Vuillermoz, Jeanna-Eve Franck, Carmelite Manto, Alexandra Rouquette, Josiane Warszawski","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is unclear how the risk of post-COVID symptoms evolved during the pandemic, especially before the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 variants and the availability of vaccines. We used modified Poisson regressions to compare the risk of six-month post-COVID symptoms and their associated risk factors according to the period of first acute COVID: during the French first (March-May 2020) or second (September-November 2020) wave. Nonresponse weights and multiple imputation were used to handle missing data. Among participants aged 15 years or older in a national population-based cohort, the risk of post-COVID symptoms was 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.9%-15.3%) in March-May 2020, vs 7.0% (95% CI, 6.3%-7.7%) in September-November 2020 (adjusted relative risk [RR], 1.36; 95% CI, 1.20-1.55). For both periods, the risk was higher in the presence of baseline physical condition(s), and it increased with the number of acute symptoms. During the first wave, the risk was also higher for women, in the presence of baseline mental condition(s), and it varied with educational level. In France in 2020, the risk of six-month post-COVID symptoms was higher during the first than the second wave. This difference was observed before the spread of variants and the availability of vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"162-171"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is unclear how the risk of post-COVID symptoms evolved during the pandemic, especially before the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 variants and the availability of vaccines. We used modified Poisson regressions to compare the risk of six-month post-COVID symptoms and their associated risk factors according to the period of first acute COVID: during the French first (March-May 2020) or second (September-November 2020) wave. Nonresponse weights and multiple imputation were used to handle missing data. Among participants aged 15 years or older in a national population-based cohort, the risk of post-COVID symptoms was 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.9%-15.3%) in March-May 2020, vs 7.0% (95% CI, 6.3%-7.7%) in September-November 2020 (adjusted relative risk [RR], 1.36; 95% CI, 1.20-1.55). For both periods, the risk was higher in the presence of baseline physical condition(s), and it increased with the number of acute symptoms. During the first wave, the risk was also higher for women, in the presence of baseline mental condition(s), and it varied with educational level. In France in 2020, the risk of six-month post-COVID symptoms was higher during the first than the second wave. This difference was observed before the spread of variants and the availability of vaccines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科维兹病后 6 个月症状风险的时间变化:一项基于全国人口的队列研究。
目前尚不清楚大流行期间,尤其是在严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2变种传播和疫苗上市之前,出现Covid后症状的风险是如何演变的。我们使用改进的泊松回归法,根据首次出现急性冠状病毒的时间段(法国第一波(2020 年 3 月至 5 月)或第二波(2020 年 9 月至 11 月)),比较出现 6 个月冠状病毒后症状的风险及其相关风险因素。非响应权重和多重估算用于处理缺失数据。在全国人口队列中 15 岁或以上的参与者中,2020 年 3 月至 5 月出现病毒感染后症状的风险为 14.6%(95% CI:13.9%,15.3%),而 2020 年 9 月至 11 月为 7.0%(95% CI:6.3%,7.7%)(调整后 RR:1.36,95% CI:1.20,1.55)。在这两个时期,如果存在基线身体状况,风险会更高,而且风险会随着急性症状数量的增加而增加。在第一波中,女性的风险也较高,如果存在精神状况,风险也会随教育程度的不同而变化。在 2020 年的法国,出现 6 个月病毒感染后症状的风险在第一波比第二波高。这种差异是在变种传播和疫苗上市之前观察到的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Exacerbation of racial disparities in COVID-19 outcomes by Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias among nursing home residents. Comparison of trends in CPS reports of child maltreatment and child maltreatment-related mortality across time, place and race/ethnicity. Estimating the Observability of an Outcome from an Electronic Health Records Dataset Using External Data. Identifying critical windows of susceptibility to perinatal lead exposure on child serum vaccine antibody levels. Re: Estimation of opioid misuse prevalence in New York State counties, 2007-2018. A Bayesian spatio-temporal abundance model approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1