An artificial intelligence grading system of apical periodontitis in cone-beam computed tomography data.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dento maxillo facial radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/dmfr/twae029
Tianyin Zhao, Huili Wu, Diya Leng, Enhui Yao, Shuyun Gu, Minhui Yao, Qinyu Zhang, Tong Wang, Daming Wu, Lizhe Xie
{"title":"An artificial intelligence grading system of apical periodontitis in cone-beam computed tomography data.","authors":"Tianyin Zhao, Huili Wu, Diya Leng, Enhui Yao, Shuyun Gu, Minhui Yao, Qinyu Zhang, Tong Wang, Daming Wu, Lizhe Xie","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In order to assist junior doctors in better diagnosing apical periodontitis (AP), an artificial intelligence AP grading system was developed based on deep learning (DL) and its reliability and accuracy were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and twenty cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were selected to construct a classification dataset with four categories, which were divided by CBCT periapical index (CBCTPAI), including normal periapical tissue, CBCTPAI 1-2, CBCTPAI 3-5, and young permanent teeth. Three classic algorithms (ResNet50/101/152) as well as one self-invented algorithm (PAINet) were compared with each other. PAINet were also compared with two recent Transformer-based models and three attention models. Their performance was evaluated by accuracy, precision, recall, balanced F score (F1-score), and the area under the macro-average receiver operating curve (AUC). Reliability was evaluated by Cohen's kappa to compare the consistency of model predicted labels with expert opinions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PAINet performed best among the four algorithms. The accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC on the test set were 0.9333, 0.9415, 0.9333, 0.9336, and 0.9972, respectively. Cohen's kappa was 0.911, which represented almost perfect consistency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PAINet can accurately distinguish between normal periapical tissues, CBCTPAI 1-2, CBCTPAI 3-5, and young permanent teeth. Its results were highly consistent with expert opinions. It can help junior doctors diagnose and score AP, reducing the burden. It can also be promoted in areas where experts are lacking to provide professional diagnostic opinions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In order to assist junior doctors in better diagnosing apical periodontitis (AP), an artificial intelligence AP grading system was developed based on deep learning (DL) and its reliability and accuracy were evaluated.

Methods: One hundred and twenty cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were selected to construct a classification dataset with four categories, which were divided by CBCT periapical index (CBCTPAI), including normal periapical tissue, CBCTPAI 1-2, CBCTPAI 3-5, and young permanent teeth. Three classic algorithms (ResNet50/101/152) as well as one self-invented algorithm (PAINet) were compared with each other. PAINet were also compared with two recent Transformer-based models and three attention models. Their performance was evaluated by accuracy, precision, recall, balanced F score (F1-score), and the area under the macro-average receiver operating curve (AUC). Reliability was evaluated by Cohen's kappa to compare the consistency of model predicted labels with expert opinions.

Results: PAINet performed best among the four algorithms. The accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC on the test set were 0.9333, 0.9415, 0.9333, 0.9336, and 0.9972, respectively. Cohen's kappa was 0.911, which represented almost perfect consistency.

Conclusions: PAINet can accurately distinguish between normal periapical tissues, CBCTPAI 1-2, CBCTPAI 3-5, and young permanent teeth. Its results were highly consistent with expert opinions. It can help junior doctors diagnose and score AP, reducing the burden. It can also be promoted in areas where experts are lacking to provide professional diagnostic opinions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锥束计算机断层扫描数据中根尖牙周炎的人工智能分级系统。
目的:方法:选取120张锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像构建分类数据集,按CBCT根尖周指数(CBCTPAI)分为正常根尖周组织、CBCTPAI 1-2、CBCTPAI 3-5和年轻恒牙四类。对三种经典算法(ResNet50/101/152)和一种自创算法(PAINet)进行了比较。PAINet 还与两种最新的基于 Transformer 的模型和三种注意力模型进行了比较。它们的性能通过准确度、精确度、召回率、平衡 F 分数(F1 分数)和宏观平均接收器工作曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估。可靠性通过科恩卡帕进行评估,以比较模型预测标签与专家意见的一致性:结果:PAINet 在四种算法中表现最佳。测试集上的准确度、精确度、召回率、F1 分数和 AUC 分别为 0.9333、0.9415、0.9333、0.9336 和 0.9972。科恩卡帕值为 0.911,几乎完全一致:PAINet能准确区分正常根尖周组织、CBCTPAI 1-2、CBCTPAI 3-5和年轻恒牙。其结果与专家意见高度一致。它可以帮助初级医生诊断和评分 AP,减轻他们的负担。它还可以在缺乏专家提供专业诊断意见的地区进行推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
期刊最新文献
A novel method for measuring the direction and angle of Central ray and predicting rotation center via panorama phantom. Automatic classification and segmentation of multiclass jaw lesions in cone-beam CT using deep learning. An artificial intelligence grading system of apical periodontitis in cone-beam computed tomography data. In vitro accuracy of ultra-low dose cone-beam CT for detection of proximal caries. Hypervigilance to pain and sleep quality are confounding variables in the infrared thermography examination of the temporomandibular joint and temporal and masseter muscles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1