Image quality of whole-body diffusion MR images comparing deep-learning accelerated and conventional sequences.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-10883-5
Andrea Ponsiglione, Will McGuire, Giuseppe Petralia, Marie Fennessy, Thomas Benkert, Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione, Anwar R Padhani
{"title":"Image quality of whole-body diffusion MR images comparing deep-learning accelerated and conventional sequences.","authors":"Andrea Ponsiglione, Will McGuire, Giuseppe Petralia, Marie Fennessy, Thomas Benkert, Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione, Anwar R Padhani","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10883-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the image quality of deep learning accelerated whole-body (WB) with conventional diffusion sequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty consecutive patients with bone marrow cancer underwent WB-MRI. Two experts compared axial b900 s/mm<sup>2</sup> and the corresponding maximum intensity projections (MIP) of deep resolve boost (DRB) accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences (time of acquisition: 6:42 min) against conventional sequences (time of acquisition: 14 min). Readers assessed paired images for noise, artefacts, signal fat suppression, and lesion conspicuity using Likert scales, also expressing their overall subjective preference. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR and CNR) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of normal tissues and cancer lesions were statistically compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, radiologists preferred either axial DRB b900 and/or corresponding MIP images in almost 80% of the patients, particularly in patients with a high body-mass index (BMI > 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). In qualitative assessments, axial DRB images were preferred (preferred/strongly preferred) in 56-100% of cases, whereas DRB MIP images were favoured in 52-96% of cases. DRB-SNR/CNR was higher in all normal tissues (p < 0.05). For cancer lesions, the DRB-SNR was higher (p < 0.001), but the CNR was not different. DRB-ADC values were significantly higher for the brain and psoas muscles, but not for cancer lesions (mean difference: + 53 µm<sup>2</sup>/s). Inter-class correlation coefficient analysis showed good to excellent agreement (95% CI 0.75-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DRB sequences produce higher-quality axial DWI, resulting in improved MIPs and significantly reduced acquisition times. However, differences in the ADC values of normal tissues need to be considered.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>Deep learning accelerated diffusion sequences produce high-quality axial images and MIP at reduced acquisition times. This advancement could enable the increased adoption of Whole Body-MRI for the evaluation of patients with bone marrow cancer.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Deep learning reconstruction enables a more than 50% reduction in acquisition time for WB diffusion sequences. DRB images were preferred by radiologists in almost 80% of cases due to fewer artefacts, improved background signal suppression, higher signal-to-noise ratio, and increased lesion conspicuity in patients with higher body mass index. Cancer lesion diffusivity from DRB images was not different from conventional sequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"7985-7993"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10883-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the image quality of deep learning accelerated whole-body (WB) with conventional diffusion sequences.

Methods: Fifty consecutive patients with bone marrow cancer underwent WB-MRI. Two experts compared axial b900 s/mm2 and the corresponding maximum intensity projections (MIP) of deep resolve boost (DRB) accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences (time of acquisition: 6:42 min) against conventional sequences (time of acquisition: 14 min). Readers assessed paired images for noise, artefacts, signal fat suppression, and lesion conspicuity using Likert scales, also expressing their overall subjective preference. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR and CNR) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of normal tissues and cancer lesions were statistically compared.

Results: Overall, radiologists preferred either axial DRB b900 and/or corresponding MIP images in almost 80% of the patients, particularly in patients with a high body-mass index (BMI > 25 kg/m2). In qualitative assessments, axial DRB images were preferred (preferred/strongly preferred) in 56-100% of cases, whereas DRB MIP images were favoured in 52-96% of cases. DRB-SNR/CNR was higher in all normal tissues (p < 0.05). For cancer lesions, the DRB-SNR was higher (p < 0.001), but the CNR was not different. DRB-ADC values were significantly higher for the brain and psoas muscles, but not for cancer lesions (mean difference: + 53 µm2/s). Inter-class correlation coefficient analysis showed good to excellent agreement (95% CI 0.75-0.93).

Conclusion: DRB sequences produce higher-quality axial DWI, resulting in improved MIPs and significantly reduced acquisition times. However, differences in the ADC values of normal tissues need to be considered.

Clinical relevance statement: Deep learning accelerated diffusion sequences produce high-quality axial images and MIP at reduced acquisition times. This advancement could enable the increased adoption of Whole Body-MRI for the evaluation of patients with bone marrow cancer.

Key points: Deep learning reconstruction enables a more than 50% reduction in acquisition time for WB diffusion sequences. DRB images were preferred by radiologists in almost 80% of cases due to fewer artefacts, improved background signal suppression, higher signal-to-noise ratio, and increased lesion conspicuity in patients with higher body mass index. Cancer lesion diffusivity from DRB images was not different from conventional sequences.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较深度学习加速序列和传统序列的全身弥散 MR 图像质量。
目的:比较深度学习加速全身(WB)和传统扩散序列的图像质量:比较深度学习加速全身(WB)与传统扩散序列的图像质量:50名连续的骨髓癌患者接受了WB-MRI检查。两位专家比较了深度解析增强(DRB)加速扩散加权成像(DWI)序列(采集时间:6:42 分钟)与传统序列(采集时间:14 分钟)的轴向 b900 s/mm2 和相应的最大强度投影(MIP)。读者使用李克特量表对成对图像的噪声、伪影、信号脂肪抑制和病变清晰度进行评估,并表达他们的总体主观偏好。对正常组织和癌症病灶的信噪比和对比度信噪比(SNR 和 CNR)以及表观弥散系数(ADC)值进行了统计比较:总体而言,近 80% 的患者,尤其是体重指数较高(BMI > 25 kg/m2)的患者,放射科医生更倾向于选择轴向 DRB b900 和/或相应的 MIP 图像。在定性评估中,56%-100% 的病例首选(首选/非常首选)轴向 DRB 图像,而 52%-96% 的病例首选 DRB MIP 图像。在所有正常组织中,DRB-SNR/CNR 都更高(p 2/s)。类间相关系数分析表明,两者的一致性良好至极佳(95% CI 0.75-0.93):结论:DRB 序列可产生更高质量的轴向 DWI,从而改善 MIP 并显著缩短采集时间。结论:DRB 序列能产生更高质量的轴向 DWI,从而改善了 MIPs 并显著缩短了采集时间,但需要考虑正常组织 ADC 值的差异:深度学习加速扩散序列能在缩短采集时间的同时生成高质量的轴向图像和 MIP。这一进步可使更多人采用全身 MRI 评估骨髓癌患者:深度学习重建使 WB 扩散序列的采集时间缩短 50%以上。在近 80% 的病例中,放射科医生更青睐 DRB 图像,因为它能减少伪影、改善背景信号抑制、提高信噪比,并在体重指数较高的患者中提高病灶的清晰度。DRB图像的癌症病灶扩散性与传统序列没有区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Comparison between CT volumetry and extracellular volume fraction using liver dynamic CT for the predictive ability of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Correction: Development and evaluation of two open-source nnU-Net models for automatic segmentation of lung tumors on PET and CT images with and without respiratory motion compensation. Correction: Machine learning detects symptomatic patients with carotid plaques based on 6-type calcium configuration classification on CT angiography. Natural language processing pipeline to extract prostate cancer-related information from clinical notes. ESR Essentials: characterisation and staging of adnexal masses with MRI and CT-practice recommendations by ESUR.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1