A review of assessment methods for measuring individual differences in oral somatosensory perception

IF 2.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of texture studies Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1111/jtxs.12849
Reisya Rizki Riantiningtyas, Anestis Dougkas, Camille Kwiecien, Florence Carrouel, Agnès Giboreau, Wender L. P. Bredie
{"title":"A review of assessment methods for measuring individual differences in oral somatosensory perception","authors":"Reisya Rizki Riantiningtyas,&nbsp;Anestis Dougkas,&nbsp;Camille Kwiecien,&nbsp;Florence Carrouel,&nbsp;Agnès Giboreau,&nbsp;Wender L. P. Bredie","doi":"10.1111/jtxs.12849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While taste and smell perception have been thoroughly investigated, our understanding of oral somatosensory perception remains limited. Further, assessing and measuring individual differences in oral somatosensory perception pose notable challenges. This review aimed to evaluate the existing methods to assess oral somatosensory perception by examining and comparing the strengths and limitations of each method. The review highlighted the lack of standardized assessment methods and the various procedures within each method. Tactile sensitivity can be assessed using several methods, but each method measures different tactile dimensions. Further investigations are needed to confirm its correlation with texture sensitivity. In addition, measuring a single textural attribute may not provide an overall representation of texture sensitivity. Thermal sensitivity can be evaluated using thermal-change detection or temperature discrimination tests. The chemesthetic sensitivity tests involve either localized or whole-mouth stimulation tests. The choice of an appropriate method for assessing oral somatosensory sensitivity depends on several factors, including the specific research objectives and the target population. Each method has its unique intended purpose, strengths, and limitations, so no universally superior approach exists. To overcome some of the limitations associated with certain methods, the review offers alternative or complementary approaches that could be considered. Researchers can enhance the comprehensive assessment of oral somatosensory sensitivity by carefully selecting and potentially combining methods. In addition, a standardized protocol remains necessary for each method.</p>","PeriodicalId":17175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of texture studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtxs.12849","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of texture studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jtxs.12849","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While taste and smell perception have been thoroughly investigated, our understanding of oral somatosensory perception remains limited. Further, assessing and measuring individual differences in oral somatosensory perception pose notable challenges. This review aimed to evaluate the existing methods to assess oral somatosensory perception by examining and comparing the strengths and limitations of each method. The review highlighted the lack of standardized assessment methods and the various procedures within each method. Tactile sensitivity can be assessed using several methods, but each method measures different tactile dimensions. Further investigations are needed to confirm its correlation with texture sensitivity. In addition, measuring a single textural attribute may not provide an overall representation of texture sensitivity. Thermal sensitivity can be evaluated using thermal-change detection or temperature discrimination tests. The chemesthetic sensitivity tests involve either localized or whole-mouth stimulation tests. The choice of an appropriate method for assessing oral somatosensory sensitivity depends on several factors, including the specific research objectives and the target population. Each method has its unique intended purpose, strengths, and limitations, so no universally superior approach exists. To overcome some of the limitations associated with certain methods, the review offers alternative or complementary approaches that could be considered. Researchers can enhance the comprehensive assessment of oral somatosensory sensitivity by carefully selecting and potentially combining methods. In addition, a standardized protocol remains necessary for each method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量口腔体感知觉个体差异的评估方法综述。
虽然味觉和嗅觉感知已得到深入研究,但我们对口腔体感感知的了解仍然有限。此外,评估和测量口腔体感知觉的个体差异也是一个显著的挑战。本综述旨在通过研究和比较每种方法的优势和局限性,评估现有的口腔体感知觉评估方法。综述强调了标准化评估方法的缺乏以及每种方法中的各种程序。触觉敏感度可通过多种方法进行评估,但每种方法测量的触觉维度各不相同。需要进行进一步调查,以确认其与纹理敏感度的相关性。此外,测量单一纹理属性可能无法全面反映纹理敏感性。热敏性可通过热变化检测或温度辨别测试来评估。化学药敏试验包括局部刺激试验或全口刺激试验。选择合适的方法来评估口腔体感敏感度取决于多个因素,包括具体的研究目标和目标人群。每种方法都有其独特的预期目的、优势和局限性,因此不存在放之四海而皆准的优越方法。为了克服某些方法的局限性,本综述提供了可考虑的替代或补充方法。研究人员可以通过精心选择和可能的方法组合来加强对口腔体感敏感性的综合评估。此外,每种方法仍然需要标准化的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of texture studies
Journal of texture studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Texture Studies is a fully peer-reviewed international journal specialized in the physics, physiology, and psychology of food oral processing, with an emphasis on the food texture and structure, sensory perception and mouth-feel, food oral behaviour, food liking and preference. The journal was first published in 1969 and has been the primary source for disseminating advances in knowledge on all of the sciences that relate to food texture. In recent years, Journal of Texture Studies has expanded its coverage to a much broader range of texture research and continues to publish high quality original and innovative experimental-based (including numerical analysis and simulation) research concerned with all aspects of eating and food preference. Journal of Texture Studies welcomes research articles, research notes, reviews, discussion papers, and communications from contributors of all relevant disciplines. Some key coverage areas/topics include (but not limited to): • Physical, mechanical, and micro-structural principles of food texture • Oral physiology • Psychology and brain responses of eating and food sensory • Food texture design and modification for specific consumers • In vitro and in vivo studies of eating and swallowing • Novel technologies and methodologies for the assessment of sensory properties • Simulation and numerical analysis of eating and swallowing
期刊最新文献
Effects of Particle Size and Shape on the Texture Property of a Solid–Liquid Dispersion System With Gel Particles Relationship Between Resultant Force Vector Acting on Human Organs From Food Bolus and the Bolus Configuration During Swallowing Using Numerical Swallowing Simulation With Moving Particle Simulation Method Multiparametric Cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) Fruit Textural Trait Development for Harvest and Postharvest Evaluation in Representative Cultivars Is the Term “Food Consistency” Used Consistently in Consumer Science? An Exploratory Study of Consumer Association and Conceptualization Impact of Pressing Time on the Microstructure of Two Types of Goat Cheeses and Its Relationship With Sensory Attributes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1