Validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index for the prediction of 30-day and 1-year mortality among patients who underwent hip fracture surgery.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Perioperative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1186/s13741-024-00417-4
Eveline de Haan, Benthe van Oosten, Veronique A J I M van Rijckevorsel, T Martijn Kuijper, Louis de Jong, Gert R Roukema
{"title":"Validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index for the prediction of 30-day and 1-year mortality among patients who underwent hip fracture surgery.","authors":"Eveline de Haan, Benthe van Oosten, Veronique A J I M van Rijckevorsel, T Martijn Kuijper, Louis de Jong, Gert R Roukema","doi":"10.1186/s13741-024-00417-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of our study was to validate the original Charlson Comorbidity Index (1987) (CCI) and adjusted CCI (2011) as a prediction model for 30-day and 1-year mortality after hip fracture surgery. The secondary aim of this study was to verify each variable of the CCI as a factor associated with 30-day and 1-year mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective database of two-level II trauma teaching hospitals in the Netherlands was used. The original CCI from 1987 and the adjusted CCI were calculated based on medical history. To validate the original CCI and the adjusted CCI, the CCI was plotted against the observed 30-day and 1-year mortality, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3523 patients were included in this cohort study. The mean of the original CCI in this cohort was 5.1 (SD ± 2.0) and 4.6 (SD ± 1.9) for the adjusted CCI. The AUCs of the prediction models were 0.674 and 0.696 for 30-day mortality for the original and adjusted CCIs, respectively. The AUCs for 1-year mortality were 0.705 and 0.717 for the original and adjusted CCIs, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A higher original and adjusted CCI is associated with a higher mortality rate. The AUC was relatively low for 30-day and 1-year mortality for both the original and adjusted CCIs compared to other prediction models for hip fracture patients in our cohort. The CCI is not recommended for the prediction of 30-day and 1-year mortality in hip fracture patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11223422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00417-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of our study was to validate the original Charlson Comorbidity Index (1987) (CCI) and adjusted CCI (2011) as a prediction model for 30-day and 1-year mortality after hip fracture surgery. The secondary aim of this study was to verify each variable of the CCI as a factor associated with 30-day and 1-year mortality.

Methods: A prospective database of two-level II trauma teaching hospitals in the Netherlands was used. The original CCI from 1987 and the adjusted CCI were calculated based on medical history. To validate the original CCI and the adjusted CCI, the CCI was plotted against the observed 30-day and 1-year mortality, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

Results: A total of 3523 patients were included in this cohort study. The mean of the original CCI in this cohort was 5.1 (SD ± 2.0) and 4.6 (SD ± 1.9) for the adjusted CCI. The AUCs of the prediction models were 0.674 and 0.696 for 30-day mortality for the original and adjusted CCIs, respectively. The AUCs for 1-year mortality were 0.705 and 0.717 for the original and adjusted CCIs, respectively.

Conclusions: A higher original and adjusted CCI is associated with a higher mortality rate. The AUC was relatively low for 30-day and 1-year mortality for both the original and adjusted CCIs compared to other prediction models for hip fracture patients in our cohort. The CCI is not recommended for the prediction of 30-day and 1-year mortality in hip fracture patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证夏尔森综合症指数对髋部骨折手术患者 30 天和 1 年死亡率的预测作用。
简介我们研究的目的是验证原始夏尔森合并症指数(Charlson Comorbidity Index,1987 年)(CCI)和调整后的 CCI(2011 年)作为髋部骨折术后 30 天和 1 年死亡率预测模型的有效性。本研究的第二个目的是验证CCI的每个变量是否与30天和1年死亡率相关:研究使用了荷兰两家二级创伤教学医院的前瞻性数据库。根据病史计算出1987年的原始CCI和调整后的CCI。为了验证原始CCI和调整后的CCI,将CCI与观察到的30天和1年死亡率进行对比,并计算曲线下面积(AUC):这项队列研究共纳入了 3523 名患者。该队列中原始 CCI 的平均值为 5.1(SD ± 2.0),调整后 CCI 的平均值为 4.6(SD ± 1.9)。原始和调整后 CCI 预测模型的 30 天死亡率 AUC 分别为 0.674 和 0.696。原始和调整后的CCI对1年死亡率的AUC分别为0.705和0.717:结论:原始和调整后CCI越高,死亡率越高。与我们队列中髋部骨折患者的其他预测模型相比,原始和调整后 CCI 的 30 天和 1 年死亡率 AUC 相对较低。不建议用CCI预测髋部骨折患者的30天和1年死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Thromboembolic complications were not different between intravenous and epidural analgesia after unilateral knee arthroplasty under neuraxial anesthesia: a propensity-score matched analysis. The red cell distribution width (RDW) was associated with preoperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in hip fractures: a retrospective study. Non-placement of nasogastric tube versus early removal of nasogastric tube in the enhanced recovery after surgery of hepatocellular carcinoma: a case control study. Perioperative auditory stimulation in the recovery of patients receiving surgical care: a narrative review. Preoperative education for reducing patient anxiety in elective hip and knee arthroplasty - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1