Emotion regulation flexibility: EEG/EMG predictors and consequences of switching between reappraisal and distraction strategies.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Psychophysiology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1111/psyp.14646
Agnieszka K Adamczyk, Saskia B J Koch, Miroslaw Wyczesany, Karin Roelofs, Jacobien M van Peer
{"title":"Emotion regulation flexibility: EEG/EMG predictors and consequences of switching between reappraisal and distraction strategies.","authors":"Agnieszka K Adamczyk, Saskia B J Koch, Miroslaw Wyczesany, Karin Roelofs, Jacobien M van Peer","doi":"10.1111/psyp.14646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Flexible use of emotion regulation (ER) strategies is central to mental health. To advance our understanding of what drives adaptive strategy-switching decisions, in this preregistered study, we used event-related potentials (late positive potential, LPP and stimulus preceding negativity, SPN) and facial electromyography (EMG corrugator activity) to test the antecedents and consequences of switching to an alternative ER strategy. Participants (N = 63, M<sub>age</sub> = 24.8 years, all female) passively watched and then implemented an instructed ER strategy (reappraisal or distraction) in response to high-intensity negative pictures that were either easy or difficult to reinterpret (high or low reappraisal affordance, respectively). Next, they decided to \"switch from\" or \"maintain\" the instructed strategy and subsequently implemented the chosen strategy. Reappraisal affordance manipulations successfully induced switching. Regarding antecedents, switching was predicted by the reduced ER efficacy of the current strategy (corrugator, but not LPP). Switching to distraction was additionally predicted by increased responses to the stimulus during passive viewing (corrugator and LPP) and increased anticipatory effort in implementing reappraisal (SPN). Concerning consequences, switching to distraction improved, whereas switching to reappraisal impaired post-choice ER effects (LPP). However, starting with reappraisal was overall more effective than starting with distraction, irrespective of the subsequent decision (corrugator). Our results suggest that switching between ER strategies occurs in accordance with situational demands (stimulus affordances) and is predicted by reduced peripheral physiological ER efficacy. However, only switching to distraction leads to improved regulatory effects. These insights provide neurocognitively grounded starting points for developing interventions targeting ER flexibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14646","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flexible use of emotion regulation (ER) strategies is central to mental health. To advance our understanding of what drives adaptive strategy-switching decisions, in this preregistered study, we used event-related potentials (late positive potential, LPP and stimulus preceding negativity, SPN) and facial electromyography (EMG corrugator activity) to test the antecedents and consequences of switching to an alternative ER strategy. Participants (N = 63, Mage = 24.8 years, all female) passively watched and then implemented an instructed ER strategy (reappraisal or distraction) in response to high-intensity negative pictures that were either easy or difficult to reinterpret (high or low reappraisal affordance, respectively). Next, they decided to "switch from" or "maintain" the instructed strategy and subsequently implemented the chosen strategy. Reappraisal affordance manipulations successfully induced switching. Regarding antecedents, switching was predicted by the reduced ER efficacy of the current strategy (corrugator, but not LPP). Switching to distraction was additionally predicted by increased responses to the stimulus during passive viewing (corrugator and LPP) and increased anticipatory effort in implementing reappraisal (SPN). Concerning consequences, switching to distraction improved, whereas switching to reappraisal impaired post-choice ER effects (LPP). However, starting with reappraisal was overall more effective than starting with distraction, irrespective of the subsequent decision (corrugator). Our results suggest that switching between ER strategies occurs in accordance with situational demands (stimulus affordances) and is predicted by reduced peripheral physiological ER efficacy. However, only switching to distraction leads to improved regulatory effects. These insights provide neurocognitively grounded starting points for developing interventions targeting ER flexibility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情绪调节的灵活性:在重新评估和转移注意力策略之间切换的脑电图/电子脑电图预测因素和后果。
灵活运用情绪调节(ER)策略对心理健康至关重要。为了进一步了解是什么驱动了适应性策略切换决策,在这项预先登记的研究中,我们使用了事件相关电位(晚期正电位、LPP和刺激前负性电位)和面部肌电图(EMG皱纹肌活动)来测试切换到另一种ER策略的前因后果。被试(63 人,年龄 24.8 岁,均为女性)被动地观看高强度的负面图片,然后针对易于或难以重新解读的图片(分别为高或低的重新评估负担能力)实施指导性的 ER 策略(重新评估或转移注意力)。接下来,他们决定 "改变 "或 "保持 "指示的策略,并随后实施所选策略。再评价承受力操作成功地诱导了转换。在前因方面,当前策略的ER效力降低(corrugator,而不是LPP)预示着转换。此外,被动观看时对刺激物的反应增加(corrugator 和 LPP)以及在实施重新评价时的预期努力增加(SPN)也预示了转换到分心策略。关于后果,改用转移注意力会改善选择后的 ER 效果,而改用重新评估则会损害选择后的 ER 效果(LPP)。然而,无论随后的决定如何,开始重新评估总体上比开始转移注意力更有效(corrugator)。我们的研究结果表明,ER 策略之间的转换是根据情境需求(刺激的可承受性)进行的,并且可以通过降低外周生理ER 效能来预测。然而,只有转而分散注意力才会提高调节效果。这些见解为开发针对ER灵活性的干预措施提供了基于神经认知的出发点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
期刊最新文献
Patterns of adaptation to stress cardiovascular responses in smokers during ad libitum smoking and withdrawal. The capacity limitations of multiple-template visual search during task preparation and target selection. The immediate and lasting effects of imagery rescripting and their associations with imagery tendency in young adults with childhood maltreatment history: An ERP study. Cortical and subcortical brain networks predict prevailing heart rate. Adversity and error-monitoring: Effects of emotional context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1