A meta-analysis of liquid biopsy versus tumor histology for detecting EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer

IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine Translational Oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102022
Jing Cai , Wanning Wang , Wenlong Zhang
{"title":"A meta-analysis of liquid biopsy versus tumor histology for detecting EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer","authors":"Jing Cai ,&nbsp;Wanning Wang ,&nbsp;Wenlong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the consistency of liquid biopsy and histologic analysis for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI et al. databases were searched to collect studies comparing liquid biopsy and histopathologic specimens. The EGFR mutation status was extracted from the studies, and meta-analysis was carried out using Stata 12.0 software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 22 studies of 3359 NSCLC patients. In the meta-analysis, eight papers with a sample size of size &lt;150 had an OR of 45, indicating that liquid biopsy had high sensitivity for detecting EGFR mutations. In addition, seven papers with a sample size ≥150, with an OR of 70, reported that liquid biopsy was highly susceptible to detecting EGFR mutations. The pooled diagnostic effect size of 6 for literature that included the T790M mutation was smaller than that of 69 for literature that did not include the T790M mutation, and <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> &gt;50 %, showing that literature that did not include the T790M mutation was more heterogeneous. The combined diagnostic effect size of 34 in the exon 19 group was smaller than that in the group with no exon 19, with an <em>I</em><sup>2</sup>&gt;50 %. There was substantial heterogeneity in both the exon 19 group and the non-exon 19 group. The group with the L858R mutation had a greater diagnostic effect size of 28, lower <em>I</em><sup>2</sup>, and less heterogeneity than the group without the L858R mutation. The exon 21 group had a larger pooled diagnostic effect size of 66, a smaller <em>I</em><sup>2</sup>, and less heterogeneity than the group without exon 21.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Liquid biopsy and histologic analysis have high concordance for detecting EGFR mutations in NSCLC. Liquid biopsy can provide an alternative technology for individualized treatment and monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitive and drug resistance (T790M) mutations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48975,"journal":{"name":"Translational Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523324001499/pdfft?md5=e4356a3c79e63769ca4a5cb4f28e0926&pid=1-s2.0-S1936523324001499-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523324001499","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the consistency of liquid biopsy and histologic analysis for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI et al. databases were searched to collect studies comparing liquid biopsy and histopathologic specimens. The EGFR mutation status was extracted from the studies, and meta-analysis was carried out using Stata 12.0 software.

Results

We included 22 studies of 3359 NSCLC patients. In the meta-analysis, eight papers with a sample size of size <150 had an OR of 45, indicating that liquid biopsy had high sensitivity for detecting EGFR mutations. In addition, seven papers with a sample size ≥150, with an OR of 70, reported that liquid biopsy was highly susceptible to detecting EGFR mutations. The pooled diagnostic effect size of 6 for literature that included the T790M mutation was smaller than that of 69 for literature that did not include the T790M mutation, and I2 >50 %, showing that literature that did not include the T790M mutation was more heterogeneous. The combined diagnostic effect size of 34 in the exon 19 group was smaller than that in the group with no exon 19, with an I2>50 %. There was substantial heterogeneity in both the exon 19 group and the non-exon 19 group. The group with the L858R mutation had a greater diagnostic effect size of 28, lower I2, and less heterogeneity than the group without the L858R mutation. The exon 21 group had a larger pooled diagnostic effect size of 66, a smaller I2, and less heterogeneity than the group without exon 21.

Conclusion

Liquid biopsy and histologic analysis have high concordance for detecting EGFR mutations in NSCLC. Liquid biopsy can provide an alternative technology for individualized treatment and monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitive and drug resistance (T790M) mutations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液体活检与肿瘤组织学检测非小细胞肺癌表皮生长因子受体突变的荟萃分析。
目的评估液体活检与组织学分析在检测晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因突变方面的一致性:方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane Library和CNKI等数据库,收集比较液体活检和组织病理学标本的研究。从研究中提取表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变状态,并使用Stata 12.0软件进行荟萃分析:我们共纳入了 22 项研究,涉及 3359 名 NSCLC 患者。在荟萃分析中,有8篇论文的样本大小2>50%,表明未纳入T790M突变的文献异质性更高。外显子 19 组的综合诊断效应大小为 34,小于无外显子 19 组,I2>50%。外显子 19 组和无外显子 19 组都存在很大的异质性。与无 L858R 突变组相比,有 L858R 突变组的诊断效应大小为 28,I2 更低,异质性更小。与无外显子21突变组相比,外显子21突变组的集合诊断效应大小更大,为66,I2更小,异质性更小:结论:液体活检和组织学分析在检测NSCLC表皮生长因子受体突变方面具有很高的一致性。液体活检可为表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂敏感和耐药(T790M)突变的晚期NSCLC患者的个体化治疗和最小残留病(MRD)监测提供替代技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
314
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Translational Oncology publishes the results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of oncology patients. Translational Oncology will publish laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer. Peer reviewed manuscript types include Original Reports, Reviews and Editorials.
期刊最新文献
Potentially actionable targets in synovial sarcoma: A tissue microarray study Multi-omics profiling to identify early plasma biomarkers in pre-diagnostic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a nested case-control study Spatial correlation between in vivo imaging and immunohistochemical biomarkers: A methodological study Non-genetic heterogeneity and immune subtyping in breast cancer: Implications for immunotherapy and targeted therapeutics CDYL loss promotes cervical cancer aggression by increasing PD-L1 expression via the suppression of IRF2BP2 transcription
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1