The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Ostomy Self-Care Index and the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care in Ostomy Patient Index.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 DERMATOLOGY Wound management & prevention Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.25270/wmp.23016
Cahide Ayik, Merve Aliye Akyol, Dilek Özden, Deniz Cenan
{"title":"The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Ostomy Self-Care Index and the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care in Ostomy Patient Index.","authors":"Cahide Ayik, Merve Aliye Akyol, Dilek Özden, Deniz Cenan","doi":"10.25270/wmp.23016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Living with an ostomy is a chronic condition, and self-care in such cases improves patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To adapt and test the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Ostomy Self-Care Index (T-OSCI) and the Turkish version of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care in Ostomy Patient Index (T-CC-OSCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A psychometric study was conducted on a convenience sample of 202 adult patients with an ostomy and their 165 caregivers. Translation and back translation, face and content validity, construct validation, and reliability assessment of the T-OSCI and the T-CC-OSCI were performed. Exploratory factor analysis was used to evaluate the construct validity. Reliability was established using Cronbach α coefficients, ceiling and floor effects, and the Hotelling T2 test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and intraclass correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Content validity values were in the range of 0.85 to 1 for both the T-OSCI and the T-CC-OSCI. Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated generally acceptable factor loadings. The overall index revealed a high level of internal consistency (T-OSCI = 0.968, T-CC-OSCI = 0.862). No statistically significant difference was found between test-retest measurements. There was no indication of either ceiling or floor effects, or response bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The T-OSCI and the T-CC-OSCI are valid and reliable indexes to measure the self-care of patients with an ostomy and their caregivers. These indexes may allow health care professionals to evaluate self-care in research and clinical settings, identify educational needs, and collaborate in developing and supporting appropriate self-care initiatives for patients with an ostomy and their caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23741,"journal":{"name":"Wound management & prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound management & prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/wmp.23016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Living with an ostomy is a chronic condition, and self-care in such cases improves patient outcomes.

Purpose: To adapt and test the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Ostomy Self-Care Index (T-OSCI) and the Turkish version of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care in Ostomy Patient Index (T-CC-OSCI).

Methods: A psychometric study was conducted on a convenience sample of 202 adult patients with an ostomy and their 165 caregivers. Translation and back translation, face and content validity, construct validation, and reliability assessment of the T-OSCI and the T-CC-OSCI were performed. Exploratory factor analysis was used to evaluate the construct validity. Reliability was established using Cronbach α coefficients, ceiling and floor effects, and the Hotelling T2 test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and intraclass correlation coefficient.

Results: Content validity values were in the range of 0.85 to 1 for both the T-OSCI and the T-CC-OSCI. Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated generally acceptable factor loadings. The overall index revealed a high level of internal consistency (T-OSCI = 0.968, T-CC-OSCI = 0.862). No statistically significant difference was found between test-retest measurements. There was no indication of either ceiling or floor effects, or response bias.

Conclusion: The T-OSCI and the T-CC-OSCI are valid and reliable indexes to measure the self-care of patients with an ostomy and their caregivers. These indexes may allow health care professionals to evaluate self-care in research and clinical settings, identify educational needs, and collaborate in developing and supporting appropriate self-care initiatives for patients with an ostomy and their caregivers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其版造口患者自我护理指数和造口患者护理人员自我护理贡献指数的心理计量特性。
背景:目的:调整并测试土耳其版造口患者自我护理指数(T-OSCI)和土耳其版造口患者护理人员自我护理贡献指数(T-CC-OSCI)的心理测量特性:对 202 名成年造口患者及其 165 名护理人员进行了心理测量研究。对 T-OSCI 和 T-CC-OSCI 进行了翻译和回译、表面和内容效度、结构验证和可靠性评估。采用探索性因子分析来评估结构效度。采用 Cronbach α 系数、上限效应和下限效应、Hotelling T2 检验、Wilcoxon 符号秩检验和类内相关系数确定了信度:T-OSCI和T-CC-OSCI的内容效度值在0.85至1之间。探索性因子分析显示,因子载荷基本可以接受。总指数显示出较高的内部一致性(T-OSCI = 0.968,T-CC-OSCI = 0.862)。测试-重测之间没有发现明显的统计学差异。没有迹象表明存在上限或下限效应或反应偏差:T-OSCI和T-CC-OSCI是衡量造口患者及其护理人员自我护理情况的有效而可靠的指数。这些指数可帮助医护人员评估研究和临床环境中的自我护理情况,确定教育需求,并合作为造口患者及其护理人员制定和支持适当的自我护理措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wound management & prevention
Wound management & prevention Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A case series describing combined negative pressure wound therapy and split-thickness skin graft as a method of sterilizing and closing midline laparotomy wounds near ostomies. A new decision tool to objectively select the most appropriate ostomy system - a survey among ostomy nurse specialists. A review of the current trends in chronic wound and scar management. Comparative occipital pressure mapping in the operating room. Early postoperative complications of elective versus emergency stoma creation: a tertiary academic center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1