Postpartum glycemic and cardiometabolic profile of women testing positive for gestational diabetes mellitus by International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) but negative by alternate criteria: Insights from CHIP–F study

IF 4.3 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103064
Yashdeep Gupta , Alpesh Goyal , Samita Ambekar , Mani Kalaivani , Neerja Bhatla , Nikhil Tandon
{"title":"Postpartum glycemic and cardiometabolic profile of women testing positive for gestational diabetes mellitus by International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) but negative by alternate criteria: Insights from CHIP–F study","authors":"Yashdeep Gupta ,&nbsp;Alpesh Goyal ,&nbsp;Samita Ambekar ,&nbsp;Mani Kalaivani ,&nbsp;Neerja Bhatla ,&nbsp;Nikhil Tandon","doi":"10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate burden of postpartum diabetes and other cardiometabolic risk factors among women who test positive for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria, but negative by alternate criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from 2019 to 2022 and is a sub-study of the CHIP–F cohort (Cohort Study of Indian Women with Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy and their Families).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Study participants (n = 826; 183 with normoglycemia and 643 with GDM using IADPSG criteria) were evaluated at a median (IQR) postpartum interval of 31 (21–45) months. Using the United Kingdom National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (UK NICE), Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA), and Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) criteria, 251 (39.0 %), 148 (23.0 %) and 384 (59.7 %) women who tested positive for GDM by IADPSG criteria, would have tested negative. The incidence of postpartum diabetes among such women was 30.4, 34.3, and 48.2 per 1000 women-years, respectively, which was significantly higher than those testing negative by both IADPSG and UK NICE (5.0 per 1000 women-years), IADPSG and CDA (9.2/1000 women-years) and IADPSG and DIPSI criteria (5.0/1000 women-years). The burden of obesity and metabolic syndrome was also significantly higher in such women.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We found a significant burden of postpartum diabetes and cardiometabolic risk factors among women who tested positive for GDM by IADPSG, but negative by alternate criteria. There are potential clinical implications of a “failed” diagnosis for future cardiometabolic diseases that need to be carefully examined.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48252,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402124001255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate burden of postpartum diabetes and other cardiometabolic risk factors among women who test positive for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria, but negative by alternate criteria.

Methods

This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from 2019 to 2022 and is a sub-study of the CHIP–F cohort (Cohort Study of Indian Women with Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy and their Families).

Results

Study participants (n = 826; 183 with normoglycemia and 643 with GDM using IADPSG criteria) were evaluated at a median (IQR) postpartum interval of 31 (21–45) months. Using the United Kingdom National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (UK NICE), Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA), and Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) criteria, 251 (39.0 %), 148 (23.0 %) and 384 (59.7 %) women who tested positive for GDM by IADPSG criteria, would have tested negative. The incidence of postpartum diabetes among such women was 30.4, 34.3, and 48.2 per 1000 women-years, respectively, which was significantly higher than those testing negative by both IADPSG and UK NICE (5.0 per 1000 women-years), IADPSG and CDA (9.2/1000 women-years) and IADPSG and DIPSI criteria (5.0/1000 women-years). The burden of obesity and metabolic syndrome was also significantly higher in such women.

Conclusions

We found a significant burden of postpartum diabetes and cardiometabolic risk factors among women who tested positive for GDM by IADPSG, but negative by alternate criteria. There are potential clinical implications of a “failed” diagnosis for future cardiometabolic diseases that need to be carefully examined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经国际糖尿病与妊娠研究小组协会(IADPSG)检测为妊娠糖尿病阳性但经其他标准检测为阴性的妇女的产后血糖和心脏代谢概况:CHIP-F研究的启示。
目的评估根据国际糖尿病和妊娠研究小组协会(IADPSG)标准检测为阳性但根据替代标准检测为阴性的妊娠糖尿病(GDM)妇女的产后糖尿病负担和其他心脏代谢风险因素:这项前瞻性横断面研究于2019年至2022年进行,是CHIP-F队列(印度妊娠期高血糖妇女及其家庭队列研究)的一项子研究:研究参与者(n = 826;其中 183 人血糖正常,643 人根据 IADPSG 标准患有 GDM)的产后评估间隔中位数(IQR)为 31(21-45)个月。根据英国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(UK NICE)、加拿大糖尿病协会(CDA)和印度妊娠糖尿病研究小组(DIPSI)的标准,按 IADPSG 标准检测出 GDM 阳性的妇女中,有 251 人(39.0%)、148 人(23.0%)和 384 人(59.7%)的检测结果为阴性。这些妇女的产后糖尿病发病率分别为每 1000 名妇女年 30.4 例、34.3 例和 48.2 例,明显高于根据 IADPSG 和英国 NICE(每 1000 名妇女年 5.0 例)、IADPSG 和 CDA(每 1000 名妇女年 9.2 例)以及 IADPSG 和 DIPSI 标准(每 1000 名妇女年 5.0 例)检测为阴性的妇女。这些妇女的肥胖和代谢综合征负担也明显较重:我们发现,在通过 IADPSG 检测出 GDM 阳性,但通过其他标准检测出 GDM 阴性的妇女中,产后糖尿病和心血管代谢风险因素的负担很重。诊断 "失败 "对未来心血管代谢疾病的潜在临床影响需要仔细研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews is the official journal of DiabetesIndia. It aims to provide a global platform for healthcare professionals, diabetes educators, and other stakeholders to submit their research on diabetes care. Types of Publications: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, short communications, case reports, letters to the Editor, and expert comments. Reviews and mini-reviews are particularly welcomed for areas within endocrinology undergoing rapid changes.
期刊最新文献
Association of dietary manganese intake with new-onset chronic kidney disease in participants with diabetes The effectiveness of delivery modalities of non-pharmacological diabetes prevention programs: A systematic review and component network meta-analysis Role of patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing 3 gene for decreasing kidney function in recently diagnosed diabetes mellitus Determinants of and barriers to diabetes care among patients with serious mental illness: A scoping review with recommendations Serum lipid peroxidation potential as a biomarker for risk-stratification of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1