Acceptability, facilitators, and barriers to a hypothetical HIV vaccine in the pre-exposure prophylaxis era.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1080/09540121.2024.2372715
Aaron Richterman, Caroline O'Brien, Fatemeh Ghadimi, Elijah Sumners, Andre Ford, Nafisah Houston, Sebrina Tate, Nancy Aitcheson, Hervette Nkwihoreze, John B Jemmott, Florence Momplaisir
{"title":"Acceptability, facilitators, and barriers to a hypothetical HIV vaccine in the pre-exposure prophylaxis era.","authors":"Aaron Richterman, Caroline O'Brien, Fatemeh Ghadimi, Elijah Sumners, Andre Ford, Nafisah Houston, Sebrina Tate, Nancy Aitcheson, Hervette Nkwihoreze, John B Jemmott, Florence Momplaisir","doi":"10.1080/09540121.2024.2372715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little is known about the pre-implementation context for a preventive HIV vaccine. We conducted interviews of individuals in Philadelphia recruited at Penn clinics and community-based organizations serving LGBTQ-identifying persons of color who 1) were cisgender men who had sex with men, or were transgender-identified, 2) had a sexually transmitted infection in the last 12 months, or sex with multiple partners within the last two weeks. We assessed acceptability, facilitators, and barriers to a hypothetical HIV vaccine using an integrated analysis approach. We interviewed 30 individuals between 2/2023-9/2023. Participants were supportive of an HIV vaccine and reported that they would strongly consider receiving one if one became available. Participants contextualized a hypothetical vaccine with the current HIV prevention context, primarily pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), indicating that they would evaluate any future vaccine in comparison to their experience within the PrEP landscape.Reported facilitators for a hypothetical HIV vaccine included vaccine access, knowledge, and understanding; their risk for HIV exposure; and perceived benefits of the vaccine. Barriers included lack of understanding of the purpose of a vaccine, stigma surrounding HIV and sexual practices that may surface towards people who seek vaccination, and potential issues with effectiveness, side effects, or lack of availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48370,"journal":{"name":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","volume":" ","pages":"1563-1569"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2024.2372715","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little is known about the pre-implementation context for a preventive HIV vaccine. We conducted interviews of individuals in Philadelphia recruited at Penn clinics and community-based organizations serving LGBTQ-identifying persons of color who 1) were cisgender men who had sex with men, or were transgender-identified, 2) had a sexually transmitted infection in the last 12 months, or sex with multiple partners within the last two weeks. We assessed acceptability, facilitators, and barriers to a hypothetical HIV vaccine using an integrated analysis approach. We interviewed 30 individuals between 2/2023-9/2023. Participants were supportive of an HIV vaccine and reported that they would strongly consider receiving one if one became available. Participants contextualized a hypothetical vaccine with the current HIV prevention context, primarily pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), indicating that they would evaluate any future vaccine in comparison to their experience within the PrEP landscape.Reported facilitators for a hypothetical HIV vaccine included vaccine access, knowledge, and understanding; their risk for HIV exposure; and perceived benefits of the vaccine. Barriers included lack of understanding of the purpose of a vaccine, stigma surrounding HIV and sexual practices that may surface towards people who seek vaccination, and potential issues with effectiveness, side effects, or lack of availability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
暴露前预防时代假定的艾滋病疫苗的可接受性、促进因素和障碍。
人们对预防性艾滋病疫苗实施前的情况知之甚少。我们对费城宾大诊所和社区组织招募的人员进行了访谈,这些人员的服务对象是具有 LGBTQ 特征的有色人种,他们 1) 是与男性发生过性关系的顺性别男性,或具有跨性别特征;2) 在过去 12 个月内曾感染过性传播疾病,或在过去两周内与多个性伴侣发生过性关系。我们采用综合分析方法评估了假定的 HIV 疫苗的可接受性、促进因素和障碍。我们在 2023 年 2 月至 2023 年 9 月期间对 30 人进行了访谈。参与者对 HIV 疫苗持支持态度,并表示如果有疫苗,他们会积极考虑接种。参与者将假想疫苗与当前的艾滋病预防环境(主要是暴露前预防(PrEP))结合起来,表示他们会将未来的疫苗与他们在 PrEP 环境中的经验进行比较评估。阻碍因素包括:对疫苗的目的缺乏了解;对寻求接种疫苗的人可能会产生的有关艾滋病毒和性行为的污名化;有效性、副作用或缺乏可用性方面的潜在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
172
期刊最新文献
Self-efficacy and consistent condom use by people living with HIV and seroconcordant and serodiscordant sexual partners in the Ceará, Brazil. Use of machine learning approaches to predict transition of retention in care among people living with HIV in South Carolina: a real-world data study. Utility of the Alcohol Use Disorder Inventory Test in determining caseness for alcohol use disorder among persons receiving antiretroviral therapy. Race/ethnicity-based discrimination, depressive symptoms, and smoking-related variables among people with HIV participating in a randomized clinical trial for cigarette smoking cessation. HIV and hepatitis C virus-related misinformation may contribute to rising rates of infection and suboptimal clinical outcomes among persons with substance use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1