Development and validation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease self-care assessment scale: a concise and comprehensive instrument to assess self-management, decision-making, and coping.
{"title":"Development and validation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease self-care assessment scale: a concise and comprehensive instrument to assess self-management, decision-making, and coping.","authors":"Sanae Iwaya, Kazuki Sato","doi":"10.18999/nagjms.86.2.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to develop and test the reliability and validity of a brief and comprehensive instrument to assess self-management, decision-making, and coping by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. A web-based questionnaire was administered to 300 COPD patients and a retest was administered to 100 COPD patients. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency, and an intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to test the reliability of the retest. The convergent and discriminant validities were also examined. Valid responses were obtained from 279 participants in the first survey and 70 participants in the retest. From our analysis, a COPD self-care assessment scale (CSCS) was developed, consisting of seven subscales and 14 items. Cronbach's alpha for the total CSCS score, intraclass correlation coefficient, and scale success rate were 0.80, 0.79, and 100%, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed that CSCS was associated with current smoking (standardized partial regression coefficient [std β] = -0.30; p < 0.001), long-term oxygen therapy (std β = 0.23; p < 0.001), and social support (std β = 0.24; p < 0.001), but not psychological symptoms or quality of life. The CSCS is also useful in assessing self-management, decision-making, and coping in Japanese COPD patients, and the scale has high reliability and validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49014,"journal":{"name":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","volume":"86 2","pages":"201-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11219224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.86.2.201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop and test the reliability and validity of a brief and comprehensive instrument to assess self-management, decision-making, and coping by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. A web-based questionnaire was administered to 300 COPD patients and a retest was administered to 100 COPD patients. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency, and an intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to test the reliability of the retest. The convergent and discriminant validities were also examined. Valid responses were obtained from 279 participants in the first survey and 70 participants in the retest. From our analysis, a COPD self-care assessment scale (CSCS) was developed, consisting of seven subscales and 14 items. Cronbach's alpha for the total CSCS score, intraclass correlation coefficient, and scale success rate were 0.80, 0.79, and 100%, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed that CSCS was associated with current smoking (standardized partial regression coefficient [std β] = -0.30; p < 0.001), long-term oxygen therapy (std β = 0.23; p < 0.001), and social support (std β = 0.24; p < 0.001), but not psychological symptoms or quality of life. The CSCS is also useful in assessing self-management, decision-making, and coping in Japanese COPD patients, and the scale has high reliability and validity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes original papers in the areas of medical science and its related fields. Reviews, symposium reports, short communications, notes, case reports, hypothesis papers, medical image at a glance, video and announcements are also accepted.
Manuscripts should be in English. It is recommended that an English check of the manuscript by a competent and knowledgeable native speaker be completed before submission.