Development and validation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease self-care assessment scale: a concise and comprehensive instrument to assess self-management, decision-making, and coping.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Nagoya Journal of Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.18999/nagjms.86.2.201
Sanae Iwaya, Kazuki Sato
{"title":"Development and validation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease self-care assessment scale: a concise and comprehensive instrument to assess self-management, decision-making, and coping.","authors":"Sanae Iwaya, Kazuki Sato","doi":"10.18999/nagjms.86.2.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to develop and test the reliability and validity of a brief and comprehensive instrument to assess self-management, decision-making, and coping by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. A web-based questionnaire was administered to 300 COPD patients and a retest was administered to 100 COPD patients. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency, and an intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to test the reliability of the retest. The convergent and discriminant validities were also examined. Valid responses were obtained from 279 participants in the first survey and 70 participants in the retest. From our analysis, a COPD self-care assessment scale (CSCS) was developed, consisting of seven subscales and 14 items. Cronbach's alpha for the total CSCS score, intraclass correlation coefficient, and scale success rate were 0.80, 0.79, and 100%, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed that CSCS was associated with current smoking (standardized partial regression coefficient [std β] = -0.30; p < 0.001), long-term oxygen therapy (std β = 0.23; p < 0.001), and social support (std β = 0.24; p < 0.001), but not psychological symptoms or quality of life. The CSCS is also useful in assessing self-management, decision-making, and coping in Japanese COPD patients, and the scale has high reliability and validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49014,"journal":{"name":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","volume":"86 2","pages":"201-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11219224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.86.2.201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and test the reliability and validity of a brief and comprehensive instrument to assess self-management, decision-making, and coping by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. A web-based questionnaire was administered to 300 COPD patients and a retest was administered to 100 COPD patients. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency, and an intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to test the reliability of the retest. The convergent and discriminant validities were also examined. Valid responses were obtained from 279 participants in the first survey and 70 participants in the retest. From our analysis, a COPD self-care assessment scale (CSCS) was developed, consisting of seven subscales and 14 items. Cronbach's alpha for the total CSCS score, intraclass correlation coefficient, and scale success rate were 0.80, 0.79, and 100%, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed that CSCS was associated with current smoking (standardized partial regression coefficient [std β] = -0.30; p < 0.001), long-term oxygen therapy (std β = 0.23; p < 0.001), and social support (std β = 0.24; p < 0.001), but not psychological symptoms or quality of life. The CSCS is also useful in assessing self-management, decision-making, and coping in Japanese COPD patients, and the scale has high reliability and validity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性阻塞性肺病自我护理评估量表的开发和验证:评估自我管理、决策和应对能力的简明综合工具。
本研究旨在开发并测试一种简短而全面的工具的可靠性和有效性,以评估慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者的自我管理、决策和应对能力。研究人员对 300 名慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行了网络问卷调查,并对 100 名慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行了复测。采用 Cronbach's alpha 评估内部一致性,并计算类内相关系数来检验重测的可靠性。此外,还对收敛效度和区分效度进行了检验。在第一次调查中有 279 人做出了有效回答,在复测中有 70 人做出了有效回答。通过分析,我们制定了慢性阻塞性肺病自我护理评估量表(CSCS),该量表由 7 个分量表和 14 个项目组成。CSCS总分的Cronbach's alpha、类内相关系数和量表成功率分别为0.80、0.79和100%。多变量分析显示,CSCS 与当前吸烟(标准化部分回归系数 [std β] = -0.30;p < 0.001)、长期氧疗(std β = 0.23;p < 0.001)和社会支持(std β = 0.24;p < 0.001)相关,但与心理症状或生活质量无关。CSCS还可用于评估日本慢性阻塞性肺病患者的自我管理、决策和应对能力,而且该量表具有很高的信度和效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original papers in the areas of medical science and its related fields. Reviews, symposium reports, short communications, notes, case reports, hypothesis papers, medical image at a glance, video and announcements are also accepted. Manuscripts should be in English. It is recommended that an English check of the manuscript by a competent and knowledgeable native speaker be completed before submission.
期刊最新文献
A novel technique for C1-C2 posterior screw insertion using patient-specific guides created by CT-based 3D printing. Adenosine triphosphate release inhibitors targeting pannexin1 improve recovery after spinal cord injury. Appendiceal adenocarcinoma associated with Amyand's hernia: a case report. Crucial roles of exosomes secreted from ganglioside GD3/GD2-positive glioma cells in enhancement of the malignant phenotypes and signals of GD3/GD2-negative glioma cells. Decubitus ulcer infection and bacteremia due to tazobactam/piperacillin-resistant Veillonella parvula.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1