Exploring the Relationship Between Atorvastatin and Memory Loss: A Comprehensive Analysis Integrating Real-World Pharmacovigilance and Mendelian Randomization.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drugs in Research & Development Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1007/s40268-024-00474-6
Kaiqin Chen, Yongtai Chen, Hesen Huang
{"title":"Exploring the Relationship Between Atorvastatin and Memory Loss: A Comprehensive Analysis Integrating Real-World Pharmacovigilance and Mendelian Randomization.","authors":"Kaiqin Chen, Yongtai Chen, Hesen Huang","doi":"10.1007/s40268-024-00474-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Atorvastatin is a drug widely used to prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Current observational studies suggest that atorvastatin may be associated with cognitive dysfunction (especially memory loss). However, some studies have suggested that dyslipidemia may be an important factor in cognitive dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to perform a pharmacovigilance analysis using real-world data from the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to assess whether memory loss is an adverse effect of atorvastatin and to further clarify its causality through Mendelian randomization (MR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted real-world data from the FAERS database (Quarter 1 2004 to Quarter 1 2023). Disproportionality analysis methods and measures of association such as the reporting odds ratio (OR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network, and polynomial Gamma Poisson distribution reduction were used to assess whether memory loss was an adverse effect of atorvastatin. In addition, we used MR to evaluate causality in depth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the pharmacovigilance analysis of atorvastatin, we extracted four datasets of clinical symptoms associated with memory loss from the FAERS database [Amnesia (n = 1196), Memory impairment (n = 840), Transient global amnesia (n = 38), and Retrograde amnesia (n = 9)]. The reporting OR, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network, and Gamma Poisson distribution reduction all showed positive results for amnesia, transient global amnesia, and retrograde amnesia, while the reporting OR and Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network also showed positive results for memory disorders. Thus, memory loss was a frequent side effect of atorvastatin. The MR analyses were used to further evaluate the association between statins and memory loss. The results of the MR analysis (statins and memory loss) are as follows: Ivw (mre) (β = 0.11 [OR = 1.11], P = 0.01 < 0.05) and the OR and β directions of MR-Egger and weighted mode were the same. The results of the MR analysis (statins and mitochondrial DNA copy number) are as follows: Ivw(mre) (β = -0.03 [OR = 0.96], P < 0.01) and the OR and β direction of MR-Egger and weighted mode are the same. The results of the MR analysis (DNA copy number and memory loss) are as follows: Ivw(β = - 0.06 [OR = 0.94], P = 0.04 < 0.05) and the OR and β direction of MR-Egger and weighted mode were the same. The pleiotropy test did not find horizontal diversity in our results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that memory loss is a notable adverse event associated with atorvastatin and provides evidence indicating a potential causal relationship between atorvastatin and memory loss. We also found that statins may further affect memory by affecting mitochondrial function. Therefore, in the clinical use of atorvastatin, it is important to carefully monitor the changes in cognitive function of patients. Second, a pharmacovigilance analysis combined with MR was used in this study to provide a new approach for the study of adverse drug reactions. This comprehensive analysis method helps to evaluate the safety of drugs and the risk of adverse reactions more comprehensively and provides doctors with a more accurate clinical decision-making basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49258,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Research & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-024-00474-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Atorvastatin is a drug widely used to prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Current observational studies suggest that atorvastatin may be associated with cognitive dysfunction (especially memory loss). However, some studies have suggested that dyslipidemia may be an important factor in cognitive dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to perform a pharmacovigilance analysis using real-world data from the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to assess whether memory loss is an adverse effect of atorvastatin and to further clarify its causality through Mendelian randomization (MR).

Methods: We extracted real-world data from the FAERS database (Quarter 1 2004 to Quarter 1 2023). Disproportionality analysis methods and measures of association such as the reporting odds ratio (OR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network, and polynomial Gamma Poisson distribution reduction were used to assess whether memory loss was an adverse effect of atorvastatin. In addition, we used MR to evaluate causality in depth.

Results: In the pharmacovigilance analysis of atorvastatin, we extracted four datasets of clinical symptoms associated with memory loss from the FAERS database [Amnesia (n = 1196), Memory impairment (n = 840), Transient global amnesia (n = 38), and Retrograde amnesia (n = 9)]. The reporting OR, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network, and Gamma Poisson distribution reduction all showed positive results for amnesia, transient global amnesia, and retrograde amnesia, while the reporting OR and Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network also showed positive results for memory disorders. Thus, memory loss was a frequent side effect of atorvastatin. The MR analyses were used to further evaluate the association between statins and memory loss. The results of the MR analysis (statins and memory loss) are as follows: Ivw (mre) (β = 0.11 [OR = 1.11], P = 0.01 < 0.05) and the OR and β directions of MR-Egger and weighted mode were the same. The results of the MR analysis (statins and mitochondrial DNA copy number) are as follows: Ivw(mre) (β = -0.03 [OR = 0.96], P < 0.01) and the OR and β direction of MR-Egger and weighted mode are the same. The results of the MR analysis (DNA copy number and memory loss) are as follows: Ivw(β = - 0.06 [OR = 0.94], P = 0.04 < 0.05) and the OR and β direction of MR-Egger and weighted mode were the same. The pleiotropy test did not find horizontal diversity in our results.

Conclusions: This study suggests that memory loss is a notable adverse event associated with atorvastatin and provides evidence indicating a potential causal relationship between atorvastatin and memory loss. We also found that statins may further affect memory by affecting mitochondrial function. Therefore, in the clinical use of atorvastatin, it is important to carefully monitor the changes in cognitive function of patients. Second, a pharmacovigilance analysis combined with MR was used in this study to provide a new approach for the study of adverse drug reactions. This comprehensive analysis method helps to evaluate the safety of drugs and the risk of adverse reactions more comprehensively and provides doctors with a more accurate clinical decision-making basis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索阿托伐他汀与记忆力减退之间的关系:结合真实世界药物警戒和孟德尔随机化的综合分析。
背景和目的:阿托伐他汀是一种广泛用于预防心脑血管疾病的药物。目前的观察性研究表明,阿托伐他汀可能与认知功能障碍(尤其是记忆力减退)有关。然而,一些研究表明,血脂异常可能是导致认知功能障碍的一个重要因素。本研究旨在利用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中的真实数据进行药物警戒分析,以评估记忆力减退是否是阿托伐他汀的不良反应,并通过孟德尔随机法(MR)进一步明确其因果关系:我们从FAERS数据库(2004年第1季度至2023年第1季度)中提取了真实世界的数据。方法:我们从 FAERS 数据库中提取了真实世界的数据(2004 年第 1 季度至 2023 年第 1 季度),采用了比例失调分析方法和关联性测量方法,如报告几率比(OR)、比例报告比、贝叶斯置信区间渐进神经网络和多项式伽玛泊松分布缩小法,以评估记忆力减退是否是阿托伐他汀的不良反应。此外,我们还利用磁共振深入评估了因果关系:在阿托伐他汀的药物警戒分析中,我们从FAERS数据库中提取了与记忆力减退相关的四个临床症状数据集[健忘症(n = 1196)、记忆障碍(n = 840)、短暂性全面健忘症(n = 38)和逆行性健忘症(n = 9)]。报告 OR、比例报告比、贝叶斯置信区间递进神经网络和伽马泊松分布还原对健忘症、短暂性全局性健忘症和逆行性健忘症均显示出阳性结果,而报告 OR 和贝叶斯置信区间递进神经网络对记忆障碍也显示出阳性结果。因此,记忆力减退是阿托伐他汀的一种常见副作用。磁共振分析用于进一步评估他汀类药物与记忆力减退之间的关联。MR 分析(他汀类药物与记忆力减退)的结果如下:Ivw(mre)(β = 0.11 [OR = 1.11],P = 0.01 < 0.05),MR-Egger和加权模式的OR和β方向相同。MR 分析(他汀类药物和线粒体 DNA 拷贝数)结果如下:Ivw(mre)(β = -0.03 [OR = 0.96],P < 0.01),MR-Egger 和加权模式的 OR 和 β 方向相同。MR分析(DNA拷贝数和记忆丧失)的结果如下:Ivw(β = - 0.06 [OR = 0.94],P = 0.04 < 0.05),MR-Egger 和加权模式的 OR 和 β 方向相同。多向性检验在我们的结果中没有发现水平多样性:本研究表明,记忆力减退是与阿托伐他汀相关的一个显著不良事件,并提供了阿托伐他汀与记忆力减退之间可能存在因果关系的证据。我们还发现,他汀类药物可能会通过影响线粒体功能而进一步影响记忆力。因此,在临床使用阿托伐他汀时,必须仔细监测患者认知功能的变化。其次,本研究采用了药物警戒分析与 MR 相结合的方法,为药物不良反应的研究提供了一种新方法。这种综合分析方法有助于更全面地评估药物的安全性和不良反应的风险,为医生提供更准确的临床决策依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs in Research & Development
Drugs in Research & Development Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs in R&D is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online only journal, and provides timely information from all phases of drug research and development that will inform clinical practice. Healthcare decision makers are thus provided with knowledge about the developing place of a drug in therapy. The Journal includes: Clinical research on new and established drugs; Preclinical research of direct relevance to clinical drug development; Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered; Reviews may also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Assessment of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP)-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions of Sepiapterin with Curcumin and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Volunteers. Trametinib Sensitivity is Defined by a Myeloid Differentiation Profile in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Pharmacokinetics, Mass Balance, and Biotransformation of [14C]tinengotinib, A Novel Multi-target Kinase Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects. Comparative Analytical Evaluation of the Proposed Biosimilar FYB206 and its Reference Medicinal Product Keytruda®. Effect of Chronic Dolutegravir Administration on the Trace Amine Profile in Wistar Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1